Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-19-2010, 08:45 PM
 
26,680 posts, read 28,659,127 times
Reputation: 7943

Advertisements

Too bad. He's President. The people voted.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-19-2010, 08:52 PM
 
Location: SARASOTA, FLORIDA
11,486 posts, read 15,301,360 times
Reputation: 4894
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
I wonder..if they could go back in time..would they have preferred Hillary ?
I know that if Hillary was on the ticket, I would have voted for her.

No McCain..sorry he's too old and Palin is a loose canon.

They say the evil you know is better then the evil you don't.

Hillary was their choice but the dems leadership screwed her over allow room for this moronic half brained twit named Bubba Obama.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2010, 08:53 PM
 
26,680 posts, read 28,659,127 times
Reputation: 7943
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunny-Days90 View Post
Hillary was their choice but the dems leadership screwed her over allow room for this moronic half brained twit named Bubba Obama.
Wrong. The people voted. Obama won the primary fair and square, regardless of how the Obama-haters want to spin it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2010, 08:53 PM
 
Location: SARASOTA, FLORIDA
11,486 posts, read 15,301,360 times
Reputation: 4894
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale View Post
Too bad. He's President. The people voted.

And a bad one at that.

He is already a lame duck quacking.

Let him continue people, he is killing the entire dem party and will destroy and end liberalism in America for many years to come.

Obama is a gift that keeps on giving. Let him continue to screw everything he touches up!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2010, 08:54 PM
 
26,680 posts, read 28,659,127 times
Reputation: 7943
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunny-Days90 View Post
And a bad one at that.

He is already a lame duck quacking.

Let him continue people, he is killing the entire dem party and will destroy and end liberalism in America for many years to come.

Obama is a gift that keeps on giving. Let him continue to screw everything he touches up!
Whatever you say. You have my pity.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2010, 08:54 PM
 
Location: SARASOTA, FLORIDA
11,486 posts, read 15,301,360 times
Reputation: 4894
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale View Post
Wrong. The people voted. Obama won the primary fair and square, regardless of how the Obama-haters want to spin it.

Who received more votes?

Fair and square my arse.

We are not spinning anything, we all know Hillary would be the better choice.

I believe you do to.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2010, 08:56 PM
 
Location: Keonsha, Wisconsin
2,479 posts, read 3,234,421 times
Reputation: 586
Quote:
51% of voters would NOT re-elect obama
Yeah, and those polled were republicans! AAAAAAAaaaaahhhhhh
those darned righties, ya just never know which way they're going to swing.
Hay sandrene, who is the preverbial electable mouse in the right's pocket this next Presidential election?
Oh, I see, NOBODY. hahahahaha.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2010, 08:58 PM
 
26,680 posts, read 28,659,127 times
Reputation: 7943
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunny-Days90 View Post
Who received more votes?

Fair and square my arse..
Perhaps you don't understand how the delegate system works. It's somewhat similar to the way George W. Bush won in 2000. The popular vote is meaningless when it comes to determining the winner.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2010, 09:14 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,596,242 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hombre57 View Post
Yeah, and those polled were republicans!



Pretty sure that percentage would have been much higher.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2010, 09:26 PM
 
Location: Keonsha, Wisconsin
2,479 posts, read 3,234,421 times
Reputation: 586
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
Pretty sure that percentage would have been much higher.
Quite possible. I have noticed that when republicans embrace tea party folks, it's ok. But after they're elected, they play the game of....who helped me get elected??? Perfect example: scott brown
Seems the tea party folk are at a corporate armslength distance from him now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:51 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top