Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Should only net payers into the system be allowed to vote?
Yes 29 35.37%
No 49 59.76%
Other 4 4.88%
Voters: 82. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-21-2010, 10:27 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
88,964 posts, read 44,780,079 times
Reputation: 13677

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sco View Post
The whole concept of taking rights away from poor people is so anti-American. What other punishments do you think low income people deserve? I've got a few that the OP and other posters would probably welcome.

1. Let's count them as only 3/5 of a person in the census. We can't have the stinking underclass skewing things like the number of congressman either.
That wouldn't work because taxpayer-funded government services are provided based on census results.

Quote:
2. Debtor's prisons. And I am not talking our modern sumptuous prison system either. Picture the Chateau d'If from Count of Monte Cristo. Poor people should be made to suffer for their sins, right?
Given the fact that everyone else is left paying higher prices, charges, and fees to offset bankruptcies and deadbeats, what do you suggest?

Quote:
3. Forced sterilizations - We need to take steps to make sure that our future generations aren't tainted by the genes of poor people.
That's clearly a hyperbolic, emotional overreaction. There is legitimate concern, however, that too many people are having children without having the means to care for or support them. The children frequently suffer under those conditions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-21-2010, 10:28 AM
 
Location: Heart of Oklahoma
1,173 posts, read 1,534,007 times
Reputation: 482
Quote:
Originally Posted by PCincorrect View Post
I agree.
If laws effect only the "INCOME" tax payers then only the income taxes payers should be allowed to vote on that issue. The folks who are affected by the law should be the ones who can vote on it, not all.

Do Atheist want religions voting for them?

Do women want men voting for them?

Do gay folks want hetros voting for them?

Do Catholics want Muslims voting for them?

Do black folks want white folks to voting for them?

Do illegal immigrants want legal immigrants to voting for them?

Do tax payers want non tax payers voting for them? NO!

It wouldn't be a bad idea if we all had a similar desire but we, as Americans, don't. Some folks like to sit around their government house and draw government checks while the government give, gives, gives and gives the whole while taking from those who live a life of waking up and going to a job that pays into the system every week. Who, that leaches our system, wants only those who pay into the system to vote, they know what that means, no more free ride. If all of the American citizens had the desire to work and EARN their money the idea for all to vote on how to spend that money would be great but they're just too many lazy asses in the country that suck our system dry.
Why is it a bad thing if a man votes for a woman and blacks voting for whites and vice versa???
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2010, 01:00 PM
 
Location: Long Island (chief in S Farmingdale)
22,180 posts, read 19,449,121 times
Reputation: 5297
Every time I don't think I can be surprised any more at the craziness level on CD, someone tries to one up the last crazy post....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2010, 01:21 PM
 
48,502 posts, read 96,816,250 times
Reputation: 18304
It is a question that is coming more and more. the idea that you have to have some skin in the game makes alot of sense since so mnay more are becoming dependent of the sate ihn this country. meaning they rely on other to fot the bills.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2010, 02:35 PM
 
5,758 posts, read 11,631,619 times
Reputation: 3870
What mechanism would you use to filter out people who didn't make their money on their own, but instead got it through family connections or other forms of non-merit-based transfer?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2010, 03:31 PM
 
61 posts, read 68,723 times
Reputation: 39
This topic brings the term "Bread and Circuses" to mind

scroll past the Tytler Cycle for the full quote

AstroRoach: The Tyler Cycle, or "Bread and Circuses"

and the meaning of "Bread and Circuses"

Bread and circuses - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:18 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top