Obama amnesty... (McCain, party affiliation, illegal, borders)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
simply means he is willing to cede parts of the US over to narco terrorists,(happening in Arizona) even if it means spoiling the DEMS precious "environment", subsidize college educations for illegals, plus a whole basket of other free services, all on the notion that after amnesty everyone that found their way into the country illegally will become another democrat zombie.
If he is stupid enough to use executive powers to grant amnesty for millions of illegals I have no doubt that is the last straw before breaking the camel's back. It could turn ugly very fast. Of course Obama wants riots in the streets so he can take away the rest of citizen rights and complete his path to dictatorship.
He has to outsource all those votes.I mean theres americans who just wont vote Dem..
Secure the borders,put e-verify in place nationwide.then maybe some thought can be..
Given to legalize a small number.what about all the people going through the process legally?
We know why he wont secure the border first.He told Senator John Kyl it would..
Take away motivation for people to vote on his "Comp Immigration Reform"aka Amnesty.
Sounds like the exact agenda Mccain was trying to pass.
It is the plan of all Progressives regardless of their party. This is why it is so very important to really know what a candidate stands for before voting for him/her. Meg Whitman's stance on amnesty is another example of why Progressivism is such a dangerous ideology and why party affiliation alone should never win a vote.
I wouldn't personally characterize amnesty as a liberal, or progressive plan. It's nothing short of insanity. I am in Arizona, and very much against giving them amnesty. ALL of my friends are. "Liberal" doesn't translate into allowing people to do whatever they wish. Not in my book, anyway.
I wouldn't personally characterize amnesty as a liberal, or progressive plan. It's nothing short of insanity. I am in Arizona, and very much against giving them amnesty. ALL of my friends are. "Liberal" doesn't translate into allowing people to do whatever they wish. Not in my book, anyway.
Progressivism is ultra-left liberal communist style psuedo-Socialim, IMO. It infects power hungry members of all parties and is diametrically opposed to the individual freedoms affirmed by our Constitution and the federal government containment and limitations of centralized power also contained within it. Just my opinion. YMMV
It is the plan of all Progressives regardless of their party. This is why it is so very important to really know what a candidate stands for before voting for him/her. Meg Whitman's stance on amnesty is another example of why Progressivism is such a dangerous ideology and why party affiliation alone should never win a vote.
I agree with the upcoming elections it's critical that people find out the candidates true colors when it comes to something as dire as illegal immigration, and voting for those against it regardless of party.
Meg whitman is a bait and switch lunatic that bought her way into the nomination.
I agree with the upcoming elections it's critical that people find out the candidates true colors when it comes to something as dire as illegal immigration, and voting for those against it regardless of party.
Meg whitman is a bait and switch lunatic that bought her way into the nomination.
Meg Whitman is a disgrace. She's a lying RINO.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.