Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-30-2010, 10:37 AM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,185,768 times
Reputation: 4269

Advertisements

I just wondered what would be learned if only C-D readers were polled about this subject. I will show the link of one poll about this, nation wide, and follow it with a poll of Louisiana people. Of course, many here will say that the 49% who support that activity isn't many. You need to read the number that are against it.

49% Favor Deepwater Oil Drilling - Rasmussen Reports™
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-30-2010, 10:39 AM
 
24,834 posts, read 37,250,617 times
Reputation: 11538
Yes, with a good look at the rules, rigs and enforcement.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2010, 10:41 AM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,404,194 times
Reputation: 9618
I would rather see drilling closer to the shore (shallow water), or on land, where it is more easily controlled/cleaned up
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2010, 10:41 AM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,749,461 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by Driller1 View Post
Yes, with a good look at the rules, rigs and enforcement.
Let me see if I get that right... if there are potential issues that need to be looked at, you'd be wary?

Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
I would rather see drilling closer to the shore (shallow water), or on land, where it is more easily controlled/cleaned up
And that already happens. It is not the point of debate here. This is about deep water drilling.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2010, 10:41 AM
 
Location: PA
5,562 posts, read 5,668,803 times
Reputation: 1962
Quote:
Originally Posted by roysoldboy View Post
I just wondered what would be learned if only C-D readers were polled about this subject. I will show the link of one poll about this, nation wide, and follow it with a poll of Louisiana people. Of course, many here will say that the 49% who support that activity isn't many. You need to read the number that are against it.

49% Favor Deepwater Oil Drilling - Rasmussen Reports™

I am for getting the oil were it is.
If it can be bad to the environment in case of a disaster other safety valves and shutdown options need to be in place.

Until alternative fuels are found and IMPLEMENTED and at lower cost then OIL.
I say drill and remove the gas tax while your at it and give no tax dollars or tax breaks to any company oil or otherwise.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2010, 10:43 AM
 
Location: North America
19,784 posts, read 15,064,674 times
Reputation: 8527
Quote:
Originally Posted by roysoldboy View Post
I just wondered what would be learned if only C-D readers were polled about this subject. I will show the link of one poll about this, nation wide, and follow it with a poll of Louisiana people. Of course, many here will say that the 49% who support that activity isn't many. You need to read the number that are against it.

49% Favor Deepwater Oil Drilling - Rasmussen Reports™

Until they are prepared to handle a disaster like the one in the gulf-no.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2010, 10:44 AM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,478 posts, read 59,618,268 times
Reputation: 24859
I would allow deep water drilling only under carefully controlled and continuously inspected conditions (a experienced oil driller as a government inspector on every shift) after a complete safety review of the conditions and the rig. Deep water drilling is far more dangerous to the workers than commercial flying so we should have similar requirements. The potential profits are so high that the inspection costs would be lost in the round off.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2010, 10:49 AM
 
1,041 posts, read 1,522,684 times
Reputation: 768
As somone who has gotten rid of his car by choice, I'm pretty much against most forms of drilling that aren't "conventional".

Sure that would send oil price shooting up, which I wouldn't mind very much, since it would take a lot of cars off the road.

I'm not an environmentalist, but I do think in urban areas, there are WAAAAAY too many cars when you have other options availabe.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2010, 10:52 AM
 
Location: Arizona
13,778 posts, read 9,627,225 times
Reputation: 7485
Deep water drilling is very dangerous and has extreme consequences if the perfect storm of incidents were to occur as we are witnessing currently. On the one hand, one large company can tap a very large oil field and reap massive profits while supplying domestic oil to feed the nations addiction thereby decreasing our dependence on middle eastern oil. On the other hand when a catastrophic falure occurs, the livelyhood of thousands of commercial fishermen and industries that depend on the tourist dollars can be ruined for many years, yet to be determined.

All that being said, I would support deep water drilling if we had a "failsafe" system in place to insure no more spills like we are witnessing now. Currently the industry has proven that it does not. The oil industry must prove to the nation that if a blowout occurs at deep water levels, they have the equipment and tecnology to handle it efficiently and expediciously. Under those conditions I would endorse deep water drilling.

I think Obama is right to call a "time out" until the industry can prove it is capable of mitigiating another deep water blow out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2010, 10:54 AM
 
24,834 posts, read 37,250,617 times
Reputation: 11538
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
I would rather see drilling closer to the shore (shallow water), or on land, where it is more easily controlled/cleaned up
They would love to do that. They can not get the permits.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top