Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
TG, isn't that exactly what you did? You cherry-picked the Maddow show for what you wanted, and excluded what you didn't want. That's how people criticque things, isn't it? Pointing out what they perceive to be a problem.
As for MSNBC reporting on what Fox is doing, holy cow! It's pretty pathetic when the story is what your competition is doing, instead of just covering the story they're covering. How desperate is that?! HAHAHAHAHAHA!!
I give MSNBC three more years, tops, then it's bye-bye (and good riddance to bad rubbish).
I was looking for a video about MSNBC deceiving viewers but I couldn't find one. So I posted what I did find to keep the ball rolling.
Thats because no one cares enough about what MSNBC is reporting on to take the time out to post the videos.. They have what, a viewership of 10, and all 10 of them post here..
So editing a video to mislead its viewers is acceptable? Msnbc has a history of doing this its not like its anything new.
Msnbc isnt suppose to tell you what to think or edit video into what they see fit are they? Arent they suppose to report what happened and let the thinking people make up their mind? I didnt know msnbc is suppose to edit things to their point of view and how they see it.
I dont expect the news to spin it how they see it. Just report what happened and let me decide.
What exactly did Maddow edit concerning Sherrod? I did not know that "Maddow" was code name for "Breitbart".
As for MSNBC reporting on what Fox is doing, holy cow! It's pretty pathetic when the story is what your competition is doing, instead of just covering the story they're covering. How desperate is that?! HAHAHAHAHAHA!!
I give MSNBC three more years, tops, then it's bye-bye (and good riddance to bad rubbish).
Actually, reporting on when a news source becomes part of the story, rather than maintaining its objectivity is responsible journalism. Journalists have an obligation to not only be critical of public officials and public figures, but to be critical of themselves. It's part of their professional standards. And I've seen a few stories on Fox reporting on journalists from other venues, so your criticism of MSNBC falls short.
Funny, your perfectly willing to excuse Maddow for edits, while blaming Fox, when they both posted the same videos..
You truly have ceased to make sense. Maybe it's all that head smacking...you know, like shaken baby syndrome. Again, what did Maddow edit? Breitbart edited the tape, Fox aired it and Maddow reported on it. Very cut and dry.
Wonder why she left out how Beck actually sided with her. Rachel wanted to mislead viewers. Why would she do that? Why are you making excuses for that
Cannot open the link that you provided, so I have no idea what you are talking about. How did she mislead?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
