Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-27-2010, 02:50 PM
 
Location: it depends
6,369 posts, read 6,408,962 times
Reputation: 6388

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by stevej64 View Post
POLO
The point is when a person touts a stock they always say they own it, their fund owns it etc.buffet did not say a word.Have you ever heard the phrase pump it and then dump it?This is why any TV show wants to know if in some way you are financially involved with the company you are touting.
stevej64, sorry, I'm just not getting it. The Berkshire investment in Goldman was huge news, coming as it did in the midst of the financial crisis and panic. Every financial news outlet covered it extensively, with a complete description of the terms. You aren't saying that Warren Buffett is a 'pump and dump' guy are you? He bought Coca-Cola in 1987 and still owns every share.

If you're asking me, I own Berkshire and Goldman Sachs. I'm not pumping either one, don't have the slightest interest in short-term moves in the price. If I see a factually incorrect posting I will attempt to correct it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-27-2010, 03:24 PM
 
Location: In the desert
4,049 posts, read 2,741,647 times
Reputation: 2483
I haven't seen job creation in the 8yrs. that the rich were given the tax breaks.

If the tax breaks for the rich are continued some of them will buy a Rolex watch, no job creation.
If the tax breaks are given more to the middle class they may buy a hundred Timex watches & THIS creates jobs.
To keep doing the same thing is foolish.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-27-2010, 03:46 PM
 
27,214 posts, read 46,745,966 times
Reputation: 15667
Quote:
Originally Posted by city414 View Post
Anybody who lives in reality....Seriously!
Try tax them more, and see how many more people will loose their job...Did you ever got a job from a poor person?

Not all business people are rich, but most jobs are created by the rich and wealthy who are and have taken the most risks....!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-27-2010, 03:57 PM
 
Location: The Land of Reason
13,221 posts, read 12,320,851 times
Reputation: 3554
You all are assuming that the money that the rich are saving via tax cuts are going to generate more jobs, but some if not all are going to pocket those savings and wait until the economy is better and then invest. Remember "rich" is a relative term which depends mainly on what you are presently earning. Bobbie on welfare looks at Joe small time business owner as being rich but he looks to be Oprah rich who in turn may want to be Bill Gates rich who in turn might look at being Saudi King rich.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-27-2010, 03:58 PM
 
Location: The Land of Reason
13,221 posts, read 12,320,851 times
Reputation: 3554
Was'nt that at one one time called "voodoo economics"? Or the "trickle down theory"?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-27-2010, 04:08 PM
 
35,016 posts, read 39,154,953 times
Reputation: 6195
Quote:
Originally Posted by bentlebee View Post
Try tax them more, and see how many more people will loose their job...Did you ever got a job from a poor person?

Not all business people are rich, but most jobs are created by the rich and wealthy who are and have taken the most risks....!
You may be thinking of small business owners, who are not "rich."

Rich people do not pay their companies' employees out of their own pockets.

Most jobs in the US are created by large corporations or small businesses.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-27-2010, 07:44 PM
 
6,022 posts, read 7,829,350 times
Reputation: 746
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan
Companies aren't hiring because there is no demand.

Ed Schultz: Companies Not Hiring To Hurt Obama
post 5
so.lowering taxes wont do anything to create jobs if there is no demand for anything
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-27-2010, 10:12 PM
 
33,387 posts, read 34,841,834 times
Reputation: 20030
Quote:
Originally Posted by NHartphotog View Post
And how would you describe the Country's financial situation NOW? Serious would be the understatement of the millenium.

Our leaders have already spent FAR past the point of no return. We'll have to start from scratch anyway. Let's do it right next time, and go back to the Founding Father's idea of an infinitesimally small federal government with no power to tax citizens AT ALL, but rather only the ability to raise money for DEFENSIVE (i.e., invaders) wars through tariffs that coincidentally protect our industry.

In other words, Libertarianism.
the problem with a sudden huge tax cut in an economy like this is that tax revenues would also suddenly drop, and likely cause the government to default on the money we owe. small cuts work better, especially if you have several over a period of four years, much like reagan did. but the real problem is not(i cant believe i am saying this) taxes, but regulations. we have far too many of them, and the health care reform law and the financial regulation law will only add to the amount of government regulations that cost businesses huge amounts of money to comply with, and many regulations are contradictory. if we can eliminate the excessive regulations, and have proper government oversight and minimal interference, business will take off again, as business owners would then invest in expanding their businesses. another thing we need to get rid of is estate taxes, capital gains taxes, and other taxes that hurt business investment.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sindey View Post
I haven't seen job creation in the 8yrs. that the rich were given the tax breaks.

If the tax breaks for the rich are continued some of them will buy a Rolex watch, no job creation.
If the tax breaks are given more to the middle class they may buy a hundred Timex watches & THIS creates jobs.
To keep doing the same thing is foolish.
Quote:
Originally Posted by simetime View Post
You all are assuming that the money that the rich are saving via tax cuts are going to generate more jobs, but some if not all are going to pocket those savings and wait until the economy is better and then invest. Remember "rich" is a relative term which depends mainly on what you are presently earning. Bobbie on welfare looks at Joe small time business owner as being rich but he looks to be Oprah rich who in turn may want to be Bill Gates rich who in turn might look at being Saudi King rich.
dont forget that the unemployment rate during the clinton years was 6%, and during the bush years, with the exception of 2001 and 2008, was 5%, and even went below 5% for a while. and you are right, the rich are holding onto their money because they are in a wait and see mode as to what happens next year with the new health care taxes, and the new health care regulations.

Quote:
Originally Posted by simetime View Post
Was'nt that at one one time called "voodoo economics"? Or the "trickle down theory"?
the term voodoo economics was coined by bush 41 during the reagan years,a nd the term trickle down economics was coined by the democrats, again during the reagan years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-27-2010, 10:33 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,108,083 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by stevej64 View Post
POLO
The point is when a person touts a stock they always say they own it, their fund owns it etc.buffet did not say a word.Have you ever heard the phrase pump it and then dump it?This is why any TV show wants to know if in some way you are financially involved with the company you are touting.
Thats a gross misrepresentation as to what Buffet does because he hasnt dumped it.. The reason why buffet doesnt "pump" his stock is because he intends to purchase more and if he announces he's buying stocks, the price goes up and he ends up chasing it.. Buffet grew rich by NOT selling stocks.. And using the profit from the original stocks to buy more..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-27-2010, 10:34 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,108,083 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by city414 View Post
so.lowering taxes wont do anything to create jobs if there is no demand for anything
If people have money sitting in the bank to spend, it creates a demand..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:08 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top