Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
What about constitution? Your graph certainly ain't, so an argument placed against it isn't constitution either. Do you have ANY idea what the constitution entails?
Getting back to the graphs, do you hate graphs that provide greater clarity, more detailed information and a broader perspective? Yes? Because the graph you're using as an argument against Old Gringo's is suggesting just that. Need your confirmation so we can move on.
There is another thread on constitution. See you there on that subject.
Rand Paul wants to remove all workplace regulation aaaah! Nevermind that's technically not his position but if it was...
What would we do without OSHA! Oops here's a chart showing workplace fatalities before and after OSHA was created (h/t John Stossel):
What HAVOC! Wait a minute...no noticeable difference....you don't say
How is it possible that when there was the ANARCHY of no OSHA that incidents still declined? And there's no dramatic drop you'd expect after this ANARCHY was removed
Could it be that OTHER workplace safety regulations went into effect way before OSHA? Could it be that these regulations might have resulted in improved worker safety?
Possibly? Maybe? Or would that reality conflict with your strongly held misconception?
Could it be that workers and employers still care now as they did before the 70's about the safety of the workplace and don't feel like working in death traps, or killing employees?
Liberals ar just looking for any excuse to trash a liberty loving candidate.
Hmmmm...
From your graph, it shows that workplace deaths decreased from about 18 per 100k before OSHA to around 3 per 100k now, yet you say there's no decline.
Could it be that OTHER workplace safety regulations went into effect way before OSHA? Could it be that these regulations might have resulted in improved worker safety?
[...]
From your graph, it shows that workplace deaths decreased from about 18 per 100k before OSHA to around 3 per 100k now, yet you say there's no decline.
Interesting...
Oh noes
Also, Mrs McConnell boasted that workplace deaths went down during her tenure, but that was because so many mfg jobs moved out the country
Who in their right mind would oppose better safety regulations?
Federal regulation, I oppose. State regulation, no problem with.
At least in state and local matters. Mines are state problems, not federal. The government can regulate how many mines there are, and can be used, but safety shouldn't be their concern. Your state has that right, just as they get to regulate the speed limit, not the federal government.
Federal regulation, I oppose. State regulation, no problem with.
At least in state and local matters. Mines are state problems, not federal. The government can regulate how many mines there are, and can be used, but safety shouldn't be their concern. Your state has that right, just as they get to regulate the speed limit, not the federal government.
I see.
So, what you're saying is that you don't agree with the US Constitution. Interesting.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Oh, yeah?
