Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-03-2010, 07:26 PM
 
Location: Michigan
29,391 posts, read 55,587,071 times
Reputation: 22044

Advertisements

NORTH HAVEN, (AP) - A disabled veteran says she has been banned from a Connecticut supermarket after the dog she needs for help with some tasks defecated in an aisle, despite her cleaning up the mess.

Kim Mucha of Wallingford says the ban imposed last month by the Big Y Supermarkets store in North Haven is a violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act and she's considering a lawsuit.

North Haven Market Bans Disabled Vet Because Of Dog - Courant.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-03-2010, 07:39 PM
 
20,187 posts, read 23,850,642 times
Reputation: 9283
If a dog is not "trained" I can see the supermarkets point of view... the dog pooped in SEVERAL locations in the store, obviously this dog was not a trained dog... its a walking health hazard in a GROCERY store no less... I think the attorney (the little greedy bastard) is just hoping to make some money with these kind of fraudulent lawsuits along with the pathetic plaintiff.... its disgusting...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-03-2010, 08:05 PM
 
Location: Colorado
1,711 posts, read 3,600,592 times
Reputation: 1760
If the article is true and the dog was not on a leash I can understand the concern. Also, if the dog defecated twice, as an owner of a highly trained animal she isn't meeting her animal's needs. She should have had the dog go before they entered the store.

This isn't an instance where the store is banning all service animals, just this one owner that doing the right thing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-03-2010, 11:40 PM
 
Location: California
37,135 posts, read 42,203,740 times
Reputation: 35012
Quote:
She says she needs her dog, Ivy, for balance and reaching low-lying items, because of injuries she suffered while serving as a military policewoman in the Air Force.
How is a dog going to help with this? Maybe a shopping cart, where she can hang on to it as she reaches down or something...but a dog?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-03-2010, 11:53 PM
 
Location: SA
744 posts, read 1,209,616 times
Reputation: 573
It goes to the way society is these days. The disabled vet is not resposible for her behavior, but expects everyone else to be accountable for theirs. It is a shame she can not realize that her dog was in the wrong and should take it and go shopping at a different store and work with her animal to prevent this from happening elswhere.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-04-2010, 10:28 AM
 
13,053 posts, read 12,948,893 times
Reputation: 2618
There are training facilities who will train your dog with you to certify it as a dog for such needs. She need only seek them out and with a bit of training, she can take the dog to public places legally and few will object as the process of training this animal resolves the issues such has occurred with her dog in this store.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-04-2010, 10:47 AM
 
Location: East Texas, with the Clan of the Cave Bear
3,266 posts, read 5,631,650 times
Reputation: 4763
Simple issue here ... the animal is not "house trained" and sounds also to have some health issues if it is defacating numerous times in a short period..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-04-2010, 10:47 AM
 
Location: Up in the air
19,112 posts, read 30,623,707 times
Reputation: 16395
If the dog is certified and was wearing the proper garment signifying that it was a service dog, then I'm more apt to side with the woman. If the dog was just a pet, then that doesn't fly.

I 'trained' one puppy through my 4H group that eventually became a service dog...those dogs go through crazy training starting from the time they're born.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-04-2010, 11:21 AM
 
Location: Land of Thought and Flow
8,323 posts, read 15,167,662 times
Reputation: 4957
The article does not say that the dog is a certified Service Dog... so I'm inclined to believe that this particular dog is just a pet who helps her. If that is the case, then I can completely understand the ban. However, if the dog is indeed a true Service Dog, then I can understand a partial ban until such time as the dog will no longer take a dump wherever it likes.

In either case, this woman needs to be retrained in proper care of a dog. A little bit of personal responsibility goes a long way.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2010, 12:01 PM
 
10,449 posts, read 12,459,957 times
Reputation: 12597
I'd give her a second chance. If her dog is a service animal, that kind of thing happens very rarely (and never for most service animal users). I think if she goes back and it never happens again, she should be allowed in the store. If it makes the store feel better, they can require her to go back into training. If it happens again, even after training, then I would say it's reasonable to ban her. But sometimes things like that happen and since she cleaned it up herself, she took responsibility.

The service animal issue seems to be so divided. I wish more people would come up with compromises.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:36 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top