Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
No. Because marriage as one-man and one-woman is status quo, and the widely accepted norm.
I would compare that white judges were not biased against arguments regarding constitutional protections based on race. However the difference is that there is not a disagreement that people are born or aren't born black, white, or Asian, etc. There is disagreement as to whether someones sexual preference is an innate characteristic.
Again... no.
He's a judge and any judge that would let their sexuality influence their ruling on a case concerning a legal question wouldn't be fit to sit on the bench. And, there is nothing to indicate this judge is unqualified.
For what it's worth, I do believe that the California judges that allowed same sex marriage were heterosexual. Seems that there is a legal consistency here not dependent on the sexuality of the judges.
C'mon... by that reasoning... wouldn't a heterosexual judge be biased against the gay argument.
Geeez....
Not really. If 50% of people support gay marriage, and given only 5-10% of people are gay, it would seem that the non gays are less biased given that you'd think virtually all gays would support gay marriage, right?
Of course this gay activist judge would spit on over 7 million voters to push the gay agenda on the people. That is the message that should be put out to the people. In California, your vote does not count!
He's a judge and any judge that would let their sexuality influence their ruling on a case concerning a legal question wouldn't be fit to sit on the bench. And, there is nothing to indicate this judge is unqualified.
For what it's worth, I do believe that the California judges that allowed same sex marriage were heterosexual. Seems that there is a legal consistency here not dependent on the sexuality of the judges.
The legal consistency is for these arrogant slobs to legislate from the bench in direct defiance of the expressed will of the people.
Why are people acting like marriage is some new thing that America came up with?
It's almost as if no one's actually done research into the subject, and are just going off of gut reactions.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
