U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 08-05-2010, 10:02 AM
 
26,793 posts, read 17,373,005 times
Reputation: 10559

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Who?Me?! View Post
No, because she doesn't KNOW anything else.


I have asked and asked the PalinDerangement Followers to post an idea Sarah had to improve the country...a plan...a solution.....NO response...NOTHING.....EVER.....
It's so true. If you turn her around an opened her up, you'd find an audio disc. She never says anythig that is original unless you count "pink elephants", "mama grizzlies" or" pitbulls with lipstick" and who would want credit for saying those things anyway. Palin is not a critical thinker unless it involves grandstanding for bucks and enriching her bank account.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-05-2010, 10:03 AM
 
Location: Europe
2,735 posts, read 2,154,954 times
Reputation: 638
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunny-Days90 View Post
At the end of every day

Obama is a total failure.

Obama lied to the American people.

Obama cannot make a good decision to save his butt.

Obama has quit on everything he has ever done.

Obama is and was a mistake.

At the end of the day, Obama is a gift that keeps on giving.

Thanks to him the dems are toast and liberalism in America is about gone.
What happened to all the polls that show Palin winning against Obama?
I have found tons that claim the contrary.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2010, 10:04 AM
 
34,990 posts, read 34,764,818 times
Reputation: 6163
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
What do you mean? He didn't VOTE for the appropriation bills as a senator?
The defense appropriations bill? He voted against the pork-ridden first, then for the amended second. Would you rather he have voted against funding the troops? (Never mind, dont answer.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2010, 10:27 AM
 
Location: Massachusetts
10,032 posts, read 7,131,336 times
Reputation: 4207
Quote:
Originally Posted by delusianne View Post
You can yourself, by comparing her accusations with his voting records in the US and IL senates.

This is the Facebook communique where Palin wrote "refudiates" btw.

You can refudiate this line by line, if you have the energy, which I dont right now.

"Barack Obama was part of the problem while in Congress. Senator Obama pushed the fiscally irresponsible measures that Democrats, who held the majority, advanced while holding the government’s purse strings. And now, as President, he’s not just one of the pack anymore as a mere contributor to the problem – he now leads the problem. We are sick and tired of President Obama pointing his finger and screeching through his blame game about what he “inherited.” Up until 18 months ago he was fully engaged in that Congressional herd mentality of the Left as he just went with the flow, adding to the debt and deficit, instead of bucking his party’s leadership to stop the recklessness. (Did you ever hear him as an independent voice standing up and speaking out against his Democrat party’s overspending and over reach? Come to think of it, did you ever hear of his congressional record at all? For the life of me I can’t think of any time he used his bully pulpit as a sitting U.S. Senator to lead free market, equality-respecting pro-private sector efforts, nor to change up actions he now conveniently condemns. He could have refudiated them all.)"


No- he was part of it as she says.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2010, 11:07 AM
 
34,990 posts, read 34,764,818 times
Reputation: 6163
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Roma View Post
No- he was part of it as she says.
Because he voted to fund the troops?

I think Sarah hopes you'll swallow that without examining it, hook line and sinker too, the way you did this one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2010, 11:28 AM
 
6,760 posts, read 10,437,233 times
Reputation: 2996
Yep, she unloaded on Obama. Kind of like she unloaded her job as governor in Alaska and became the most famous quitter in American politics. Still not sure why people care what this quitter has to say.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2010, 11:44 AM
 
16,284 posts, read 9,125,151 times
Reputation: 6561
Quote:
Originally Posted by delusianne View Post
Sarah was insisting Obama's voting with the democrats and getting us into this mess. I provided his voting records. Not sure how that's "a hodgepodge of useless information."

To dispute the point made, you can read Sarah's Facebook post -- it's posted in here too -- and see for yourself the several "inaccuracies" therein, by comparing the voting record.
the second was from 2008 most of it was NV. That doesnt mean he was not on board with the Dem agenda.


Any attempt by anyone to suggest that Bammer was not on board with the dem agenda while in the Senate is not being honest.

Bammer certainly was and for the last 2 years before he was president Dems had full control of congress. THEY were the spenders. Mrs. Palin is 100% right about that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2010, 11:59 AM
 
Location: Massachusetts
10,032 posts, read 7,131,336 times
Reputation: 4207
Quote:
Originally Posted by delusianne View Post
Because he voted to fund the troops?

I think Sarah hopes you'll swallow that without examining it, hook line and sinker too, the way you did this one.

So Obama wasn't in congress during the Bush years when the dems had a majority.

Thanks for clearing that up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2010, 12:05 PM
 
34,990 posts, read 34,764,818 times
Reputation: 6163
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferd View Post
the second was from 2008 most of it was NV. That doesnt mean he was not on board with the Dem agenda.

Any attempt by anyone to suggest that Bammer was not on board with the dem agenda while in the Senate is not being honest.
Sarah said, "Senator Obama pushed the fiscally irresponsible measures that Democrats, who held the majority, advanced while holding the government’s purse strings.... Up until 18 months ago he was fully engaged in that Congressional herd mentality of the Left as he just went with the flow, adding to the debt and deficit".

You'd have to define "the dem agenda," then, since she didnt, and translate his voting record into that -- to see what evilnesses he and the Ds voted for/goodnesses they voted against.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferd View Post
Bammer certainly was and for the last 2 years before he was president Dems had full control of congress. THEY were the spenders. Mrs. Palin is 100% right about that.
Are you and Mrs Palin saying not one R voted to, for instance, appropriate money for the military, or to continue to fund Medicare?

Speaking of fiscally irresponsible measures, Obama voted for the streamlined amended mil appropriations bill that was mostly funding the troops; some Republican had created the first one that was full of unnecessary Pentagon pork.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2010, 07:04 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,314 posts, read 39,617,572 times
Reputation: 7107
Quote:
Originally Posted by delusianne View Post
Because he voted to fund the troops?

I think Sarah hopes you'll swallow that without examining it, hook line and sinker too, the way you did this one.
Who are you trying to fool?

There is MORE than ONE bill she's talking about.

ALL the bills that came from the democratically controlled congress, raising spending to unsustainable levels, obama was a part of. He voted WITH his party on every single one, creating the mountain of debt we have today.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:36 AM.

© 2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top