U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 1.5 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-09-2010, 10:36 AM
 
Location: Houston, TX
1,590 posts, read 3,166,061 times
Reputation: 1409

Advertisements

...prior to their appointment to the cabinet. You know what the private business sector is...a real life business, not a government job. Here are the percentages.


T. Roosevelt........38%
Taft...................40%
Wilson .............. 52%
Harding.............. 49%
Coolidge.............48%
Hoover ...............42%
F. Roosevelt....... 50%
Truman.............. 50%
Eisenhower..........57%
Kennedy............ 30%
Johnson.............. 47%
Nixon................ 53%
Ford.................. 42%
Carter............... 32%
Reagan.............. 56%
G H Bush..............51%
Clinton .............. 39%
G W Bush..............55%

And the winner is:
Obama................. 8% !!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-09-2010, 10:42 AM
 
16,623 posts, read 14,353,196 times
Reputation: 11492
A) is this anytime prior to being in the cabinet, or just immediately prior?

If it is immediately prior, then what difference does that make?


B) How many of those "private business sector" jobs were lobbyists?

C) Do you have a source?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-09-2010, 10:51 AM
 
17,571 posts, read 7,236,048 times
Reputation: 4046
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redrover View Post
...prior to their appointment to the cabinet. You know what the private business sector is...a real life business, not a government job. Here are the percentages.


T. Roosevelt........38%
Taft...................40%
Wilson .............. 52%
Harding.............. 49%
Coolidge.............48%
Hoover ...............42%
F. Roosevelt....... 50%
Truman.............. 50%
Eisenhower..........57%
Kennedy............ 30%
Johnson.............. 47%
Nixon................ 53%
Ford.................. 42%
Carter............... 32%
Reagan.............. 56%
G H Bush..............51%
Clinton .............. 39%
G W Bush..............55%

And the winner is:
Obama................. 8% !!!
It's not surprising, with all the libs who spend their lives working in academia or bouncing in and out of all the liberal policy orientated, non-profit foundations, funded government grants, and other rich libs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-09-2010, 10:58 AM
 
28,729 posts, read 9,410,958 times
Reputation: 3073
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wapasha View Post
It's not surprising, with all the libs who spend their lives working in academia or bouncing in and out of all the liberal policy orientated, non-profit foundations, funded government grants, and other rich libs.
They are completely disconnected from economic reality, and it shows.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-09-2010, 11:06 AM
 
16,623 posts, read 14,353,196 times
Reputation: 11492
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wapasha View Post
It's not surprising, with all the libs who spend their lives working in academia or bouncing in and out of all the liberal policy orientated, non-profit foundations, funded government grants, and other rich libs.

So you'd prefer that a president appoint lobbyists instead?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-09-2010, 11:07 AM
 
Location: Virginia Beach
7,277 posts, read 3,198,149 times
Reputation: 2060
.......And? I fail to see the point here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-09-2010, 11:09 AM
 
17,571 posts, read 7,236,048 times
Reputation: 4046
Quote:
Originally Posted by le roi View Post
A) is this anytime prior to being in the cabinet, or just immediately prior?

If it is immediately prior, then what difference does that make?


B) How many of those "private business sector" jobs were lobbyists?

C) Do you have a source?
a quick search turned up these:

Obama's Business Blind Spot - Forbes.com

Obama’s Cabinet: This graph explains a lot | Kyle Wingfield

GOP Leader Blog | Republican Leader John Boehner | gopleader.gov

I think the better way to look at 0bama's appointments as to how much of their adult life they worked in the private sector. Because even 0bama probably worked a short time at a fast foods place, or some other distraction, as he drifted in and out of government and non-profit foundation jobs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-09-2010, 11:11 AM
 
Location: bold new city of the south
4,941 posts, read 2,136,401 times
Reputation: 5694
Quote:
Originally Posted by le roi View Post
A) is this anytime prior to being in the cabinet, or just immediately prior?

If it is immediately prior, then what difference does that make?


B) How many of those "private business sector" jobs were lobbyists?

C) Do you have a source?

I checked several articles, only one mentioned actual numbers. It boasted 16 'private sector' jobs. One was a judge, six more were lawyers, three more in academics.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-09-2010, 11:12 AM
 
31,385 posts, read 18,539,137 times
Reputation: 14472
Does anyone find it ironic that the president most accused (well prior to Obama) as having set the socialist wheels rolling had one of the highest level of cabinet officers from the private sector, FDR?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-09-2010, 11:20 AM
 
17,571 posts, read 7,236,048 times
Reputation: 4046
Quote:
Originally Posted by le roi View Post
So you'd prefer that a president appoint lobbyists instead?
Regardless of presidential executive order, to not hire lobbyists, he has nominated or appointed Eric Holder, William Lynn, William Corr, David Hayes, Mark Patterson, Ron Klain, Mona Sutphen, Melody Barnes, Cecilia Munoz, Patrick Gaspard, and Michael Strautmanis. So what is your point?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $84,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2014, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 - Top