Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-06-2010, 05:51 AM
 
Location: Massachusetts
10,029 posts, read 8,344,311 times
Reputation: 4212

Advertisements

Wasn't Porkulus supposed to do this?


Officials: Obama to back infrastructure spending - Yahoo! News (http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_obama_economy - broken link)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-06-2010, 06:06 AM
 
1,890 posts, read 2,653,495 times
Reputation: 920


The white house may have to raid Fort Knox to pay for the so-called short-term public projects.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2010, 06:25 AM
 
13,005 posts, read 18,903,092 times
Reputation: 9252
Even if we had a strong economy with jobs for everyone (which we clearly do not) there are a lot of infrastructure needs. The society for civil engineers notes that roads and bridges across the nation are in bad shape and need attention. Do we need more events like the I-35 bridge collapse in Minnesota?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2010, 06:29 AM
 
Location: Don't be a cry baby!
1,309 posts, read 1,362,320 times
Reputation: 617
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lariat View Post


The white house may have to raid Fort Knox to pay for the so-called short-term public projects.
I'm afraid if they did raid it they would be launching the next expensive investigation.

Let me make a prediction like Nostradamus, the infrastructure spending will be near the Mexican border.
Nothing like employing thousands of illegal aliens who might be able to vote in 2012!
Or, all union employment!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2010, 06:35 AM
 
Location: Fredericktown,Ohio
7,168 posts, read 5,364,890 times
Reputation: 2922
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Roma View Post
Wasn't Porkulus supposed to do this?


Officials: Obama to back infrastructure spending - Yahoo! News (http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_obama_economy - broken link)
They should name the bill the little stimulus. I am betting that they will not call the bill or bills a stimulus, to do so the dupes would have to admit that the first one has not worked. And that would be blasphemy against their Keynesian religion.
Lucky for us the bill or bills won't see the light of day because of this :
Quote:
Officials said the White House would consider closing a number of special tax breaks for oil and gas companies to pay for the proposal.


Which will bring out the lobbyist in full force to grease the palms of our leaders to kill the bill. Which will force the {D}s to bring it to the floor with no way to pay for it, and being so close to the election hardly any {D}s want to be tied to more borrowing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2010, 06:41 AM
 
Location: My little patch of Earth
6,193 posts, read 5,367,423 times
Reputation: 3059
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Roma View Post
Wasn't Porkulus supposed to do this?
Alright! Just what we need!

More turtle tunnels and unused bridge restructuring!


Now we'll get outta this hole!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2010, 06:42 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,464,288 times
Reputation: 27720
Well at least we don't have to get new signs made..we'll just use the ones from the last infrastructure bill.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2010, 06:59 AM
 
35,016 posts, read 39,148,897 times
Reputation: 6195
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Roma View Post
Wasn't Porkulus supposed to do this?


Officials: Obama to back infrastructure spending - Yahoo! News (http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_obama_economy - broken link)
"Porkulus," did you make that up yourself? Or were you just misled by your leaders into believing Obama spends/earmarks the stimulus money himself personally?

(Don't bother answering )

Now the majority of the $787 billion isn't pork. Indeed, tax relief alone makes up some 34 percent of the bill. Where you might find the pork is in the so-called discretionary spending portion of the bill, which amount to $308 billion, according to the Congressional Budget Office. Of that money, $48 billion goes to the Department of Transportation for various rail and road projects to repair and expand infrastructure. That leaves about $260 billion of discretionary spending that goes to various federal agencies, as well as to state and local governments. How much of that amount helps special interests instead of the economy as a whole? That depends, of course, on what you consider a special interest. But decide for yourself. Here is a list of some of the most controversial individual pieces of discretionary spending that might have the pleasant taste of pork.

Finding the Pork in the Obama Stimulus Bill - US News and World Report

From your own article (did you even read it?):
Obama made infrastructure investments a central part of the $814 billion stimulus Congress passed last year, but with that spending winding down, the economy's growth has slowed. Officials said this infrastructure package differs from the stimulus because it's aimed at long-term growth, while still focusing on creating jobs in the short-term.

....Labor Secretary Hilda Solis said the plan Obama was to unveil Monday would "put construction workers, welders, electricians back to work ... folks that have been unemployed for a long time."

"Wary of the public's concern over rising deficits, the administration insists a second stimulus plan, similar to last year's $814 billion bill, is not in the works."

Last edited by delusianne; 09-06-2010 at 07:52 AM.. Reason: "drunken sailor" -- totally misleading thread title
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2010, 07:03 AM
 
29,981 posts, read 42,926,416 times
Reputation: 12828
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lariat View Post


The white house may have to raid Fort Knox to pay for the so-called short-term public projects.
The only thing left inside the Ft. Knox vault is a slip of paper with an I.O.U. to China.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2010, 07:07 AM
 
Location: texas
3,135 posts, read 3,780,625 times
Reputation: 1814
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Roma View Post
Wasn't Porkulus supposed to do this?


Officials: Obama to back infrastructure spending - Yahoo! News (http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_obama_economy - broken link)


Hey now, this Sailor takes offense to that. We weren't that bad, were we??
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:04 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top