Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-08-2010, 08:07 PM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,039,086 times
Reputation: 17864

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary Siete View Post
Social security is a hand out. In most cases you take more than you give. Lets tell old folks what they can and can't buy with their checks?
The better idea is to abolish it, let me keep my money and do what I want with it. People that have already paid into the system will get what is due to them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-08-2010, 08:08 PM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,749,261 times
Reputation: 3146
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary Siete View Post
Social security is a hand out. In most cases you take more than you give. Lets tell old folks what they can and can't buy with their checks?
But that is only because you are forced into the system. many people can't afford ss tax and a retirement plan. If you gave the people a choice between opting out of ss and investing on their own, ss would then be a hand out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-08-2010, 08:09 PM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,749,261 times
Reputation: 3146
Quote:
Originally Posted by thecoalman View Post
The better idea is to abolish it, let me keep my money and do what I want with it. People that have already paid into the system will get what is due to them.
Bingo!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-08-2010, 08:10 PM
 
Location: The High Seas
7,372 posts, read 16,012,366 times
Reputation: 11867
Yes. Soylent Green.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-08-2010, 08:17 PM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,039,086 times
Reputation: 17864
Quote:
Originally Posted by shorebaby View Post
B ss would then be a hand out.
It's not a handout until you pay nothing into it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-08-2010, 08:19 PM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,749,261 times
Reputation: 3146
Quote:
Originally Posted by thecoalman View Post
It's not a handout until you pay nothing into it.
If you had a choice between ss and a private retirement plan, and you chose ss. I think any ss funds withdrawn above and beyond what you put in plus the meager interest would be a handout.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2010, 05:11 AM
 
4,696 posts, read 5,821,156 times
Reputation: 4295
Yes if we have to have the food stamp program I would prefer that junk food is prohibited. Afterall the N in SNAP is supposed to stand for Nutrition.

It's gotten to the point where I can tell who's going to swipe a food stamps card or not based on what's in a shoppng cart. The more junk the more likely they pull out the card and swipe away.

I even see people at 7-11 buying nothing but junk and paying for it with their tax payer (or printing press) supported food stamp card. I even saw one morbidly obese woman buy 10 candy bars with food stamps. I never saw anything like this pre-Obama. Speaking of which, if Michelle Obama is truly concerned about childhood obesity she would be pushing to prohibit food stamp users from buying junk food. That would do more to reduce childhood (and adult) obesity than ANYTHING she has done so far.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2010, 05:20 AM
 
Location: Tampa Florida
22,229 posts, read 17,851,724 times
Reputation: 4585
Food Stamps cannot be used to buy a shirt. Why, because a shirt is not food, it has no food value. Why should Food Stamps be used to purchase soda, twinkies, candy bars,.... all those items that have no food value?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2010, 05:29 AM
 
2,059 posts, read 5,747,992 times
Reputation: 1685
Here in IL the WIC list is quite restrictive. I think it should be, as has been said before use your own cash to buy junk if that's what you want, but feed your kids something better with your food stamps. Nobody needs soda. But they do need a filling and nutritious meal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2010, 05:46 AM
 
Location: Florida
23,173 posts, read 26,189,754 times
Reputation: 27914
"......Bloomberg and Paterson announced Thursday that they are seeking permission from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, which administers the nation's food stamp program, to add sugary drinks to the list of prohibited goods for city residents receiving assistance. If approved, it would be the first time an item would be banned from the federal program based solely on nutritional value"

NY seeks to ban sugary drinks from food stamp buys - Times Union (http://www.timesunion.com/news/article/NY-seeks-to-ban-sugary-drinks-from-food-stamp-buys-691080.php - broken link)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top