Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-04-2007, 02:18 PM
 
Location: Poulsbo, WA
467 posts, read 324,925 times
Reputation: 110

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dwatted Wabbit View Post
Valerie was not an operative, she was an office wonk when she was "outed." BTW, her CIA status was common knowledge among her friends and others, she was far from Secret Agent Man, givin' her a number and takin 'way her name.

BTW, I have no love for the B-C team, they are the worst our nation has seen since C-G. The two worst administrations in the republic's history.

Isn't it nice to live in interesting times?
What is your source for this statement? I've heard a little of people say what they THOUGHT her status was, but if she had not been covert the CIA would have had NO reason to refer her matter for investigation. The trigger was her status and it was pulled.

So I'm assuming you know her or her friends or these others you speak of and have first hand knowledge of her status as opposed to just hearing some pundit on Fox news say what they think.

You know what should be the smokin gun for you???

The woman testified before Congress - under oath - as to her status in the CIA. Now, don't you think that if she had LIED under oath that ANY of the Republicans sitting on that committee could have her thrown in jail??? Did they? Has anyone charged her with lying?

Any other rumors you want to spread without substantiation?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-04-2007, 02:38 PM
 
Location: Midwest
9,414 posts, read 11,159,448 times
Reputation: 17905
Andrew C. McCarthy on Valerie Plame on National Review Online (http://www.nationalreview.com/mccarthy/mccarthy200507180801.asp - broken link)

Don't get all excited just because I happen to disagree with your worldview.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-04-2007, 02:43 PM
 
Location: Poulsbo, WA
467 posts, read 324,925 times
Reputation: 110
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dwatted Wabbit View Post
Andrew C. McCarthy on Valerie Plame on National Review Online (http://www.nationalreview.com/mccarthy/mccarthy200507180801.asp - broken link)

Don't get all excited just because you happen to disagree with my worldview.
Two points:

1) YOU actually stated she was not covert and then proceed to link an article stating in the 2nd paragraph that she was covert...

2) I do get quite excited when people spout opinion as fact. You are entitled to your opinion, but not your facts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-04-2007, 02:48 PM
 
Location: Debary, Florida
2,267 posts, read 3,297,053 times
Reputation: 685
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toninole View Post
Two points:

1) YOU actually stated she was not covert and then proceed to link an article stating in the 2nd paragraph that she was covert...

2) I do get quite excited when people spout opinion as fact. You are entitled to your opinion, but not your facts.
I think alot of Republicans would prefer to believe that a woman would not be given that kind of responsibility within the CIA...Misogynist = Conservatives
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-04-2007, 02:54 PM
 
Location: Warwick, NY
1,174 posts, read 5,902,412 times
Reputation: 1023
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dwatted Wabbit View Post
Andrew C. McCarthy on Valerie Plame on National Review Online (http://www.nationalreview.com/mccarthy/mccarthy200507180801.asp - broken link)

Don't get all excited just because I happen to disagree with your worldview.
Read page 2. According to the CIA, she was covert.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:41 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top