Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Should high level executives of corporations benefiting from corporate welfare including bailouts be
Yes 20 66.67%
No 5 16.67%
There should be no mandatory drug testing based on government aid 5 16.67%
Voters: 30. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-13-2010, 04:31 PM
 
Location: Earth
17,440 posts, read 28,602,920 times
Reputation: 7477

Advertisements

Should the CEOs and top level executives of corporations that recieve bailouts, subsidies, etc. from government be forced to take mandatory drug tests?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-13-2010, 04:35 PM
 
Location: Earth
17,440 posts, read 28,602,920 times
Reputation: 7477
Full question:
"Should high level executives of corporations benefiting from corporate welfare including bailouts from the government be forced to take drug tests?"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2010, 04:40 PM
 
45,226 posts, read 26,443,162 times
Reputation: 24980
End welfare for all.

Problem solved.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2010, 06:49 PM
 
Location: SARASOTA, FLORIDA
11,486 posts, read 15,306,908 times
Reputation: 4894
We do not do it for the lazy welfare bums who steal from us taxpayers as we all know most of them are healthy enough to work so why should be do this?

Willing to bet that you wont find very many highly successful CEO's who are on drugs but you will find a high percent of loser bums sucking off the rest of us having drugs in their system.

End welfare for everyone and make losers earn their keep.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2010, 11:46 PM
 
Location: Earth
17,440 posts, read 28,602,920 times
Reputation: 7477
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunny-Days90 View Post

Willing to bet that you wont find very many highly successful CEO's who are on drugs but you will find a high percent of loser bums sucking off the rest of us having drugs in their system.
Those CEOs do far more damage relative to their overall numbers than low income people on other sorts of welfare. Said "loser bums" don't outsource jobs to China, don't expect the government to do their bidding, don't control members of Congress, don't employ illegal aliens, etc. etc.

Obviously not all CEOs are bad ; there are good and bad in all groups. Many CEOs make positive contributions to society. But those CEOs of corporations who have recieved bailouts, have influenced legislation and foreign policy in their favor, have done considerable damage to the American and world economy, etc. are the biggest welfare parasites in America.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-14-2010, 12:18 AM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,642 posts, read 26,378,527 times
Reputation: 12648
Quote:
Originally Posted by majoun View Post
Those CEOs do far more damage relative to their overall numbers than low income people on other sorts of welfare. Said "loser bums" don't outsource jobs to China, don't expect the government to do their bidding, don't control members of Congress, don't employ illegal aliens, etc. etc.

Obviously not all CEOs are bad ; there are good and bad in all groups. Many CEOs make positive contributions to society. But those CEOs of corporations who have recieved bailouts, have influenced legislation and foreign policy in their favor, have done considerable damage to the American and world economy, etc. are the biggest welfare parasites in America.
Obviously, your post is intended to divert attention away from the real issue of welfare recipients selling food stamp cards (my tax dollars) for street drugs. This has the effect of depriving innocent children of food and promoting the illegal drug industry.

If it makes you sleep better at night knowing the executives of all those banks that contributed so heavily to Democrats in 2008 have to also do a wiz quiz in addition to the customary bribery to keep those legislative loopholes and regulatory exemptions flowing, so be it. I would prefer they not get a dime, they not be to large to fail and unable to reward our lawmakers leaving office for their years of loyal service with cushy multi-million dollar lobbyist jobs and board seats.

When Clinton repealed Glass-Steigal many large financial institutions became "too large to fail", so when this Congress passed comprehensive financial reform, why wasn't Glass-Steigal or equivalent legislation a part of the reforms?



Outsourcing?


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b3ooMrgXido

http://www.carnegieendowment.org/publications/index.cfm?fa=view&id=234
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-14-2010, 01:29 AM
 
2,023 posts, read 5,313,112 times
Reputation: 2004
No bailouts, instead jail time for those criminals cause the bailouts are just a massive transfer of wealth and fix nothing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-14-2010, 10:52 AM
 
Location: Earth
17,440 posts, read 28,602,920 times
Reputation: 7477
Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
Obviously, your post is intended to divert attention away from the real issue of welfare recipients selling food stamp cards (my tax dollars) for street drugs. This has the effect of depriving innocent children of food and promoting the illegal drug industry.
If Wall Street disappeared than the cocaine market in Manhattan, LI, and Westchester and Fairfield Counties would shrink drastically

BTW I'm not advocating the disappearance of Wall Street itself, just the crooks and parasites.

Quote:
If it makes you sleep better at night knowing the executives of all those banks that contributed so heavily to Democrats in 2008 have to also do a wiz quiz in addition to the customary bribery to keep those legislative loopholes and regulatory exemptions flowing, so be it.
Most wouldn't pass.

Quote:
I would prefer they not get a dime, they not be to large to fail and unable to reward our lawmakers leaving office for their years of loyal service with cushy multi-million dollar lobbyist jobs and board seats.
I'd prefer that too. No bailouts and if they're too big to fail, break them up. But at the very least those CEOs should be treated like poor welfare cheats.

It's ironic that Obama's administration has been even more protective of Wall Street and catering to the interest of large banks than even Reagan's which was regarded as being very Wall Street-friendly including by the big banks themselves.

Quote:
When Clinton repealed Glass-Steigal many large financial institutions became "too large to fail", so when this Congress passed comprehensive financial reform, why wasn't Glass-Steigal or equivalent legislation a part of the reforms?
Lobbying and capture.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-14-2010, 10:58 AM
 
10,875 posts, read 13,811,333 times
Reputation: 4896
Quote:
Originally Posted by 73-79 ford fan View Post
No bailouts, instead jail time for those criminals cause the bailouts are just a massive transfer of wealth and fix nothing.
Agreed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-14-2010, 11:18 AM
 
Location: OCEAN BREEZES AND VIEWS SAN CLEMENTE
19,893 posts, read 18,444,477 times
Reputation: 6465
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunny-Days90 View Post
We do not do it for the lazy welfare bums who steal from us taxpayers as we all know most of them are healthy enough to work so why should be do this?

Willing to bet that you wont find very many highly successful CEO's who are on drugs but you will find a high percent of loser bums sucking off the rest of us having drugs in their system.

End welfare for everyone and make losers earn their keep.

I like you Sunny-Days90, and yes i agree with you here. Not all but most people on welfare, are those who are lazy and can work, but believe in the Dem way, taking something for nothing. End welfare, and this problem should vanish, but with the Democratic Way, will never happen, we all know that, they need this bunch, for votes, remember.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:06 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top