Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-17-2010, 11:43 AM
 
25,021 posts, read 27,919,738 times
Reputation: 11790

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by tablemtn View Post
That's pretty much it. There are now several decades' worth of psychological research about which political campaign tactics are most effective, and negative advertising is one of the "best" tools out there.

It is possible to overdo it and look mean-spirited, but the benefits almost always outweigh the risks. The real question becomes how to attack, not whether to attack at all.
And the marketers know that, negative ads will get people talking more and raise more awareness, hence the fact that there are more negative ads out there than positive, especially when it's close to election time. Negative ads are like the nuclear bombs of the electioneering world.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-17-2010, 11:46 AM
 
Location: California
11,466 posts, read 19,345,447 times
Reputation: 12713
Quote:
Originally Posted by KYBob View Post
With exception of local politics. I haven't seen anyone running for office that doesn't resort to negative campaign ads against their opponents.

Lately all I've heard and seen have been negative campaign ads telling me how terrible someones opponent is because of something that happened 30 years ago or because of something their opponent said that has been taken completely out of context.

I'm tired of it! Both parties continue to do it and in my eyes it just lowers my opinion of the candidate doing it. Makes me feel like I'm voting to select the lesser of two scumbags!
Exactly the way I feel
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2010, 04:30 PM
 
33,387 posts, read 34,820,716 times
Reputation: 20030
Quote:
Originally Posted by KYBob View Post
With exception of local politics. I haven't seen anyone running for office that doesn't resort to negative campaign ads against their opponents.

Lately all I've heard and seen have been negative campaign ads telling me how terrible someones opponent is because of something that happened 30 years ago or because of something their opponent said that has been taken completely out of context.

I'm tired of it! Both parties continue to do it and in my eyes it just lowers my opinion of the candidate doing it. Makes me feel like I'm voting to select the lesser of two scumbags!
many years ago here in tucson, we had two candidates, jim kolbe(R) and jim corbett(D) run a clean campaign. absolutely no mudslinging. it was dubbed the gentleman jim campaign, well the republican jim kolbe won the election. two years later when the seat came up in the next election cycle, the campaign started out as a clean one, but corbett, still stinging from the loss two years before, started slinging the mud around hot and heavy. he lost again, and i dont think he has been in politics since.

if you feel like you are voting for the lesser of two scumbags, chances are that you are in fact voting that way. most politicians are only slightly better than child molesters, and slightly worse than used car salesmen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2010, 04:39 PM
 
Location: Southern Willamette Valley, Oregon
11,238 posts, read 11,015,248 times
Reputation: 19700
I don't mind the content of the ads as much as how how often they run them. If each commercial break had like, one or two ad's, it would be no big deal. Lately though, 6 of 8 commercials at each break seem to be these ads. Yesterday, I saw the same frickin' ad three times in a row, back to back to back, on the same channel during the same commercial break. Who has control over how often a particular ad is shown, or in what order? Is it the candidate or the network? Do the candidates know how irritating their constant dribble is? Do they even care????
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2010, 04:49 PM
 
Location: Michigan
5,376 posts, read 5,344,175 times
Reputation: 1633
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbohm View Post

if you feel like you are voting for the lesser of two scumbags, chances are that you are in fact voting that way. most politicians are only slightly better than child molesters, and slightly worse than used car salesmen.

Most people who go into politics do so with conviction and a sense of doing it for the public good. Once they get in, they find, that you can not survive unless you play the game, your good intentions will not get past the political machines. So while you might think your get a little win getting a new (D) or (R) in office, unless they play the game, the will not accomplish a thing. And you will be back at the same point the next election cycle.

So I would not put them (in a general sense) in either category. (although some might come close)
But I would put their political parties somewhere below the lesser.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:03 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top