Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-22-2010, 01:07 PM
 
23,655 posts, read 17,467,969 times
Reputation: 7471

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucario View Post
I'm sure he did.......................but that's waaaaaay beside the point here.
Not when you have a black woman making the charge. I guess we can't go there though so you are right.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-22-2010, 01:07 PM
 
Location: Center of the universe
24,645 posts, read 38,586,156 times
Reputation: 11780
Quote:
Originally Posted by janelle144 View Post
Bill Clinton wasn't in his bedroom with Monica, he was in the oval office. He was working on the taxpayers dime so he shouldn't have been playing. I don't care what he did after hours or in his private time. I'm sure the Lincoln bedroom was used plenty of times.
And that required an investigation that required hundreds of thousands of dollars of taxpayer money to prove that he's a horny bastard?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2010, 01:12 PM
 
6,034 posts, read 10,664,043 times
Reputation: 3989
Quote:
Originally Posted by brien51 View Post
Yes he was, but what does that matter in terms of crime? The people here aren't discussing civil cases, they are dicussing criminal charges, therefore your point is irrelevant.
Nope, the statement was that OJ is innocent. He's not, he's merely innocent in a criminal court. Guilty in civil court.

Quote:
How about Obama's admission of breaking the law by using Cocaine? He is in charge now of drug enforcement. IS this not the same conflict of interest you people are pointing about about Thomas.
I don't care if Thomas is a hound dog and looks at porn. I'm not one of the ones complaining about him in this thread. All I stated was that it's okay if he likes and looks at porn, but it's not okay if he brings sexual harrassment into the office.

Quote:
BO was never convicted of using Cocaine, but he ADMITTED to it. so wouldn't that disqualify him from the office according to your logic? He admitted to breaking the law. He admitted to being a law breaker. How do you square that with your Justice Thomas argument? Should BO recuse himself on every drug related legislation? Please...

Please, take the accusatory bs and ignore it since it is only partisan bull...and petty as well, proven by the fact that BO was given a pass on his Cocaine use.
What about Bush and his cocaine use?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2010, 01:15 PM
 
13,631 posts, read 20,722,659 times
Reputation: 7640
Bush, Clinton, Thomas, Obama?

Come on! These are not social malcontents. They just like to party. Nothing wrong with throwing back a few and chasing some teeny boppers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2010, 01:16 PM
 
Location: South Fla
9,644 posts, read 9,829,756 times
Reputation: 1942
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucario View Post
Did you think the same way when the Republican hypocrites were using Ken Starr to stick his nose all up in Bill Clinton's bedroom?
The only thing I cared about when it came to Clinton and his penis. Was that he committed perjury. I do care that the president of the United States NOT be a liar. Had he been honest. The story would have been completely different


I personally dont care if Good Ole Bill as a new affair daily. That is between him and Hillary.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2010, 01:19 PM
 
Location: Center of the universe
24,645 posts, read 38,586,156 times
Reputation: 11780
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jadex View Post
The only thing I cared about when it came to Clinton and his penis. Was that he committed perjury. I do care that the president of the United States NOT be a liar. Had he been honest. The story would have been completely different


I personally dont care if Good Ole Bill as a new affair daily. That is between him and Hillary.
Then why did you care about whether or not he committed perjury about an affair he had that affected neither you nor me? Very inconsistent on your part.

He shouldn't have even been asked about it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2010, 01:23 PM
 
10,545 posts, read 13,562,785 times
Reputation: 2823
I thought it would only upset the "Christian Right" that he likes porn?! Doesn't this make him more moderate?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2010, 01:25 PM
 
Location: Northridge/Porter Ranch, Calif.
24,492 posts, read 33,228,746 times
Reputation: 7609
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mercury Cougar View Post
A man enjoying porn is normal. Bringing unwanted sexual attention into the office is not.
Lol. You should have told to Bill Clinton!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2010, 01:25 PM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,808,044 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by brien51 View Post
I didn't call any poster a liar. I wrote they were spreading false and baseless accusations, which they are. They are repeating what someone else has written. Not their fault if they don't know the difference.

Now try answering how, using your logic here, Obama should occupy the POTUS position when he admitted to being a lawbreaker by using cocaine.

I suppose I could find two people from Columbia U and have them say the sniffed cocaine all of the time with BO. Then I could go on and delcare PBO is a COCAINE ADDICT! I yi yi

Justice Thomas never admitted anything near breaking the law and you want to hang him with your double standard born out partisanship. So, let's see you use the same logic to defend Obama.


By your own logic, Obama should not qualify to occupy the WH because he admitted to being a law breaker, yet you say he qualifies to sit in the oval office and make policy for drug laws.

You pointed out that Thomas ruled on sexual cases suggesting he isn't qualified because of the hearing in the Senate. Yet this pales in comparison to what Obama did and he sits in the WH and has a veto or a pen for drug laws. Oh the hypocrisy... Let's hear it but I think I would be waiting a long time for answer on this one.
I didn't suggest he wasn't qualified. I suggested that his opinion of what comprises sexual harrassment isn't an opinion shared by most people. And I thought that was important because his opinions carry more weight than the average person's. You continue to try to take my statements and try to say that I'm making arguments that I'm not.

Again, Obama is a straw man argument. It is by YOUR logic, not mine, that would disqualify him. Since I never spoke to qualifications nor to impeachment. Perhaps you might read over my comments again, because you don't seem to understand what I am saying at all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2010, 01:25 PM
 
13,631 posts, read 20,722,659 times
Reputation: 7640
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rggr View Post
I thought it would only upset the "Christian Right" that he likes porn?! Doesn't this make him more moderate?

Bah! That crowd loves porn. They are just more discrete than Thomas.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:53 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top