Clarence Thomas was obsessed with porn! (how much, crimes, bill, Bill Clinton)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Bill Clinton wasn't in his bedroom with Monica, he was in the oval office. He was working on the taxpayers dime so he shouldn't have been playing. I don't care what he did after hours or in his private time. I'm sure the Lincoln bedroom was used plenty of times.
And that required an investigation that required hundreds of thousands of dollars of taxpayer money to prove that he's a horny bastard?
Yes he was, but what does that matter in terms of crime? The people here aren't discussing civil cases, they are dicussing criminal charges, therefore your point is irrelevant.
Nope, the statement was that OJ is innocent. He's not, he's merely innocent in a criminal court. Guilty in civil court.
Quote:
How about Obama's admission of breaking the law by using Cocaine? He is in charge now of drug enforcement. IS this not the same conflict of interest you people are pointing about about Thomas.
I don't care if Thomas is a hound dog and looks at porn. I'm not one of the ones complaining about him in this thread. All I stated was that it's okay if he likes and looks at porn, but it's not okay if he brings sexual harrassment into the office.
Quote:
BO was never convicted of using Cocaine, but he ADMITTED to it. so wouldn't that disqualify him from the office according to your logic? He admitted to breaking the law. He admitted to being a law breaker. How do you square that with your Justice Thomas argument? Should BO recuse himself on every drug related legislation? Please...
Please, take the accusatory bs and ignore it since it is only partisan bull...and petty as well, proven by the fact that BO was given a pass on his Cocaine use.
Did you think the same way when the Republican hypocrites were using Ken Starr to stick his nose all up in Bill Clinton's bedroom?
The only thing I cared about when it came to Clinton and his penis. Was that he committed perjury. I do care that the president of the United States NOT be a liar. Had he been honest. The story would have been completely different
I personally dont care if Good Ole Bill as a new affair daily. That is between him and Hillary.
The only thing I cared about when it came to Clinton and his penis. Was that he committed perjury. I do care that the president of the United States NOT be a liar. Had he been honest. The story would have been completely different
I personally dont care if Good Ole Bill as a new affair daily. That is between him and Hillary.
Then why did you care about whether or not he committed perjury about an affair he had that affected neither you nor me? Very inconsistent on your part.
I didn't call any poster a liar. I wrote they were spreading false and baseless accusations, which they are. They are repeating what someone else has written. Not their fault if they don't know the difference.
Now try answering how, using your logic here, Obama should occupy the POTUS position when he admitted to being a lawbreaker by using cocaine.
I suppose I could find two people from Columbia U and have them say the sniffed cocaine all of the time with BO. Then I could go on and delcare PBO is a COCAINE ADDICT! I yi yi
Justice Thomas never admitted anything near breaking the law and you want to hang him with your double standard born out partisanship. So, let's see you use the same logic to defend Obama.
By your own logic, Obama should not qualify to occupy the WH because he admitted to being a law breaker, yet you say he qualifies to sit in the oval office and make policy for drug laws.
You pointed out that Thomas ruled on sexual cases suggesting he isn't qualified because of the hearing in the Senate. Yet this pales in comparison to what Obama did and he sits in the WH and has a veto or a pen for drug laws. Oh the hypocrisy... Let's hear it but I think I would be waiting a long time for answer on this one.
I didn't suggest he wasn't qualified. I suggested that his opinion of what comprises sexual harrassment isn't an opinion shared by most people. And I thought that was important because his opinions carry more weight than the average person's. You continue to try to take my statements and try to say that I'm making arguments that I'm not.
Again, Obama is a straw man argument. It is by YOUR logic, not mine, that would disqualify him. Since I never spoke to qualifications nor to impeachment. Perhaps you might read over my comments again, because you don't seem to understand what I am saying at all.
I thought it would only upset the "Christian Right" that he likes porn?! Doesn't this make him more moderate?
Bah! That crowd loves porn. They are just more discrete than Thomas.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.