Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Wow. You mean just before an election a politician says hes gonna focus on the things that matter. This may change the course of political leadership as we know it.
Location: Georgia, on the Florida line, right above Tallahassee
10,471 posts, read 15,777,942 times
Reputation: 6435
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest
Anyone find the timing of this just a little suspicions, 7 days before an election, where Democrats are supposed to get pounded? I bet its more likely Republicans will focus on the deficits and Obama will be forced to play along...
Someone famously said deficits don't matter. That would be Dick Cheney. Looks like him and Obama are in perfect agreement on this.
His name was George Bush. My, my....gee, people attacking the figurehead. It's just a different year and a different head. Craps been happening since Carter. I remember that. Carter was an idiot. Reagan was an idiot. Clinton was a sex clown idiot. Bush was a buffoon idiot. Now Obama is a muslim kenyan marxist socialist vacationing idiot.
His name was George Bush. My, my....gee, people attacking the figurehead. It's just a different year and a different head. Craps been happening since Carter. I remember that. Carter was an idiot. Reagan was an idiot. Clinton was a sex clown idiot. Bush was a buffoon idiot. Now Obama is a muslim kenyan marxist socialist vacationing idiot.
What.... ever.
Wow - I think you've nailed the mood of the electorate better than any of the experts!
As President, I suspect one would have to weigh a great many issues and prioritize which needed dealing with first. Does this mean he is not sincere now or only that he isn't sincere in general for failing to address this issue sooner?
In order to make an attack point, the ultimate point of this thread is to remove focus on the action of reducing deficit, which I think we all would agree is a good thing, and instead focus on just shooting Obama down as though there isn't 48907254028976 other things to be critical of.
The ultimate point of this thread is to show how his priorities have kept millions of people unemployed. While there are 48907254028976 other things to be critical of, the ONE most critical thing is WORKING. Not be carried by government programs. I'd like to know how many of you still supporting Obama are the very ones complaining about those of us, on said programs.
Anyone thinking the economy is getting better, check your local 'food shelf' line and/or waiting area. Check your local Dept. of Soc. Services waiting area.
The ultimate point of this thread is to show how his priorities have kept millions of people unemployed. While there are 48907254028976 other things to be critical of, the ONE most critical thing is WORKING. Not be carried by government programs. I'd like to know how many of you still supporting Obama are the very ones complaining about those of us, on said programs.
Anyone thinking the economy is getting better, check your local 'food shelf' line and/or waiting area. Check your local Dept. of Soc. Services waiting area.
It's five o' clock somewhere.
Yes, I agree Obama most certainly should have placed more focus on unemployment which started to skyrocket at the end of 2007 and was at like 7.5% or there abouts when he took office. Of course at that time, people were talking about the recession turning into something worse than the Great Depression and managing to keep our entire economy from utter collapse is more important that just jobs. You'll find no argument from me that he should have focused harder on unemployment instead of heath care.
Although it is kind of ironic though that had he focused on jobs and improved things economically, the Republicans would likely not gain the House back in the midterms, so one point of joy for those on the right is that Obama's failure is their success.
What he should do is tell the Republicans "OK if you want to cut spending, we will". Then he should start VETOING things like the huge farm bill which largely goes to Republican states and big defense contracts which largely benefit red states. Then we will see how serious the Republicans are before we move on to programs like school lunches, Schip and Social Security.
couldn't rep ya, so I'll do it here!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.