words Of Ronald Reagan (house of representatives, regime, Kennedy, border)

[wjtwet]

Originally Posted by burdell

No, you show me where I ever said he was charged.

Destroying evidence greatly lessens your chances of being charged, I guess you'll just casually ignore that, eh?

You asked if anyone was ever investigated for treason, your question was answered. That is unless you believe selling weapons to an enemy is not treason.

You're the one spreading manure around, maybe you shoild consider a reading comprehension course

Here are your words:
Stalin was the leader of an ally.

Was Iran an ally or will you NeoConfused continue to believe there is actually such a thing as justifiable treason because make no mistake, selling weapons to an enemy is the very definition of treason.

You accuse him of treason.
I asked was anyone ever charged with treason
the answer is no
So you throw a pile of manure on a wall where treason was never accused or charged based on your hate
No one was charged or investigated for treason yet you say its treason.
if i had your opinion of the law and the actual fact that no one was investigated or charged with treason I will take the facts instead of your political hackery

[ergohead]

Originally Posted by wjtwet

Here are your words:
Stalin was the leader of an ally.

Was Iran an ally or will you NeoConfused continue to believe there is actually such a thing as justifiable treason because make no mistake, selling weapons to an enemy is the very definition of treason.

You accuse him of treason.
I asked was anyone ever charged with treason
the answer is no
So you throw a pile of manure on a wall where treason was never accused or charged based on your hate
No one was charged or investigated for treason yet you say its treason.
if i had your opinion of the law and the actual fact that no one was investigated or charged with treason I will take the facts instead of your political hackery

Are you a supporter of unlimited corruption?

[wjtwet]

Originally Posted by ergohead

Are you a supporter of unlimited corruption?

Have you stopped beating your wife or husband?

[burdell]

Originally Posted by wjtwet

You accuse him of treason.
I asked was anyone ever charged with treason
the answer is no
So you throw a pile of manure on a wall where treason was never accused or charged based on your hate
No one was charged or investigated for treason yet you say its treason.
if i had your opinion of the law and the actual fact that no one was investigated or charged with treason I will take the facts instead of your political hackery

You also asked: Investigated for treason?

Are you denying selling weapons to an enemy is treason?

He was certainly investigated for that and admitted involvement.

Just where is the mystical statute allowing 'justifiable' treason the right clings to?

[wjtwet]

Originally Posted by burdell

You also asked: Investigated for treason?

Are you denying selling weapons to an enemy is treason?

He was certainly investigated for that and admitted involvement.

Just where is the mystical statute allowing 'justifiable' treason the right clings to?

There was no treason .
No charge of treason means no treason.
Just where is your mystical statute that allows you to claim treason when there was none.
Its your opinion based on no facts of treason thats where. So you spew your opinions but they are not facts

[burdell]

Originally Posted by wjtwet

There was no treason .
No charge of treason means no treason.

WRONG! No charge means only there was not enough evidence to bring charges. Or in your little FantasyLand do you believe shredding documents was just Ollie's hobby? And he was dismissed by Reagan, indicted on 16 charges, convicted of 3, all because he's a choir boy? He's a disgrace to the uniform he wore.

Originally Posted by wjtwet

Just where is your mystical statute that allows you to claim treason when there was none.
Its your opinion based on no facts of treason thats where. So you spew your opinions but they are not facts

So, you deny arming an enemy is treason?

Interesting set of values you NeoConfused have, deranged and not in the interests of the country but interesting.

[ergohead]

Originally Posted by wjtwet

Have you stopped beating your wife or husband?

Yeah, yeah, I know.

Corruption trumps law every day of the week and twice on Sunday.

[wjtwet]

Originally Posted by burdell

WRONG! No charge means only there was not enough evidence to bring charges. Or in your little FantasyLand do you believe shredding documents was just Ollie's hobby? And he was dismissed by Reagan, indicted on 16 charges, convicted of 3, all because he's a choir boy? He's a disgrace to the uniform he wore.




So, you deny arming an enemy is treason?

Interesting set of values you NeoConfused have, deranged and not in the interests of the country but interesting.

If there was treason then theri woudl have beencharges for it. North was charged but not treason. So as you said there wa sno proof of treason so no treason.
So the use of the term is juts poitocal nonsense that shows no understanding of what happened.

Treason - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Oran's Dictionary of the Law (1983) defines treason as "...[a]...citizen's actions to help a foreign government overthrow, make war against, or seriously injure the [parent nation]." In many nations, it is also often considered treason to attempt or conspire to overthrow the government, even if no foreign country is aided or involved by such an endeavor.

any aide given to foreign government in Iran Contra was not an attempt to take down the American government . get it clear what he did was not treason.
So the claims of treason is nothing but BS

[burdell]

Originally Posted by wjtwet

If there was treason then theri woudl have beencharges for it. North was charged but not treason. So as you said there wa sno proof of treason so no treason.
So the use of the term is juts poitocal nonsense that shows no understanding of what happened.

Treason - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Oran's Dictionary of the Law (1983) defines treason as "...[a]...citizen's actions to help a foreign government overthrow, make war against, or seriously injure the [parent nation]." In many nations, it is also often considered treason to attempt or conspire to overthrow the government, even if no foreign country is aided or involved by such an endeavor.

any aide given to foreign government in Iran Contra was not an attempt to take down the American government . get it clear what he did was not treason.
So the claims of treason is nothing but BS

Well, we were also sending the ingredients for mustard gas to Iran, you know, one of the things we went to war about, sounds pretty damn harmful to the parent nation to me.

But, typical NeoConfused blinders, multiple indictments, convictions, and pardons of players in the Reagan administration but they were all just good little boys, eh?

If it looks like a pile of steaming crap, smells like a pile of steaming crap, it IS a pile of steaming crap.

The teflon Don..................................er POTUS lives on

[wjtwet]

Originally Posted by burdell

Well, we were also sending the ingredients for mustard gas to Iran, you know, one of the things we went to war about, sounds pretty damn harmful to the parent nation to me.

But, typical NeoConfused blinders, multiple indictments, convictions, and pardons of players in the Reagan administration but they were all just good little boys, eh?

If it looks like a pile of steaming crap, smells like a pile of steaming crap, it IS a pile of steaming crap.

The teflon Don..................................er POTUS lives on

You used the term treason. It was not treason. I have defined what treason and this action did not define treason.
So you are just throwing political manure to a wall hoping it would stick You either did not know what treason was or delibiratly emblished . So you are eithe rignorant of what treason mean or posting as a troll. That looks like a pile of steaming crap, smells like a pile of steaming crap, it IS a pile of steaming crap.