U.S. Cities  

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Register Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 700,000 other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 15,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads.

Get a detailed profile
Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply


 
Old 07-10-2007, 10:47 AM
220 people need to be fired
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: San Antonio
9,762 posts, read 5,071,445 times
Reputation: 1949
rd2007 has a brilliant future
rd2007 has a brilliant futurerd2007 has a brilliant futurerd2007 has a brilliant future
I'll have to discuss that with my dad. He's been in the banking biz for over 40 years and is currently president and CEO of a bank he started himself. Not to mention former president of the ABA and good friends with Martha Seeger (Fed Governor appointed by Reagan in 1980 and former neighbor of my grandma)..

I believe China is profiting much more from our debt..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-10-2007, 11:10 AM
Please?
Status: "Hanging tight" (set 12 days ago)
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cinti expatriate in Phila.
5,856 posts, read 4,576,489 times
Reputation: 3571
Ohiogirl81 has a reputation beyond repute
Ohiogirl81 has a reputation beyond reputeOhiogirl81 has a reputation beyond reputeOhiogirl81 has a reputation beyond reputeOhiogirl81 has a reputation beyond reputeOhiogirl81 has a reputation beyond reputeOhiogirl81 has a reputation beyond reputeOhiogirl81 has a reputation beyond reputeOhiogirl81 has a reputation beyond reputeOhiogirl81 has a reputation beyond reputeOhiogirl81 has a reputation beyond reputeOhiogirl81 has a reputation beyond reputeOhiogirl81 has a reputation beyond reputeOhiogirl81 has a reputation beyond reputeOhiogirl81 has a reputation beyond reputeOhiogirl81 has a reputation beyond reputeOhiogirl81 has a reputation beyond reputeOhiogirl81 has a reputation beyond reputeOhiogirl81 has a reputation beyond reputeOhiogirl81 has a reputation beyond reputeOhiogirl81 has a reputation beyond reputeOhiogirl81 has a reputation beyond reputeOhiogirl81 has a reputation beyond reputeOhiogirl81 has a reputation beyond reputeOhiogirl81 has a reputation beyond repute
My objection is that we invaded a sovereign nation and deposed and ultimately killed its leader (and then had the nerve to act surprised when the natives fought back).

If we're supposed to be such a beacon of democracy, what the hell kind of message is that?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2007, 11:31 AM
220 people need to be fired
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: San Antonio
9,762 posts, read 5,071,445 times
Reputation: 1949
rd2007 has a brilliant future
rd2007 has a brilliant futurerd2007 has a brilliant futurerd2007 has a brilliant future
it was more even more evidence that civilians can't fight a war.. war is dirty, let the people who know that fight it..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2007, 11:33 AM
Accessory to Public Urination
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Virginia
4,305 posts, read 2,285,851 times
Reputation: 1739
Rhett_Butler has a brilliant futureRhett_Butler has a brilliant futureRhett_Butler has a brilliant futureRhett_Butler has a brilliant futureRhett_Butler has a brilliant futureRhett_Butler has a brilliant futureRhett_Butler has a brilliant futureRhett_Butler has a brilliant futureRhett_Butler has a brilliant futureRhett_Butler has a brilliant futureRhett_Butler has a brilliant futureRhett_Butler has a brilliant futureRhett_Butler has a brilliant futureRhett_Butler has a brilliant futureRhett_Butler has a brilliant futureRhett_Butler has a brilliant futureRhett_Butler has a brilliant futureRhett_Butler has a brilliant futureRhett_Butler has a brilliant futureRhett_Butler has a brilliant futureRhett_Butler has a brilliant futureRhett_Butler has a brilliant futureRhett_Butler has a brilliant futureRhett_Butler has a brilliant future
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohiogirl81 View Post
My objection is that we invaded a sovereign nation and deposed and ultimately killed its leader (and then had the nerve to act surprised when the natives fought back).

If we're supposed to be such a beacon of democracy, what the hell kind of message is that?
Well, the hilarity of it all is that the majority of Iraqis were thrilled with the parts you mentioned and then when the majority wished to take control of thier country (which somehow we apparrently didn't realize that Shiites were a VAST majority in Iraq and would take control EVEN IN A DEMOCRACY) and probably get in bed with Iran.

We freed Iraq up for self-determination and I'm beginning to think it's a good time to step aside and let that self-determination take place by stationing our troops on the borders of Iran and Syria and letting Iraqis fight it out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2007, 11:36 AM
220 people need to be fired
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: San Antonio
9,762 posts, read 5,071,445 times
Reputation: 1949
rd2007 has a brilliant future
rd2007 has a brilliant futurerd2007 has a brilliant futurerd2007 has a brilliant future
yep, we can set up some observation posts and impersonate the blue helmets (UN troops)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2007, 01:20 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
8,447 posts, read 3,478,775 times
Reputation: 2396
macmeal has a reputation beyond repute
macmeal has a reputation beyond reputemacmeal has a reputation beyond reputemacmeal has a reputation beyond reputemacmeal has a reputation beyond reputemacmeal has a reputation beyond reputemacmeal has a reputation beyond reputemacmeal has a reputation beyond reputemacmeal has a reputation beyond reputemacmeal has a reputation beyond reputemacmeal has a reputation beyond reputemacmeal has a reputation beyond repute
Default Three Facts and a Conclusion

(1) Some men like their women "trashy". You may not understand, nor do I. Don't these guys realize they're asking for trouble and heartbreak? Perhaps they enjoy the "adventure" of it all- I don't know; you'd have to ask them their reasons....I only know such men do exist.

(2) Some women like their men "rough". Not nice, not sensitive, not caring, but strong, macho and mean. Why? Oh, I don't know- maybe it makes them feel protected...maybe they get some sort of naughty "thrill"- you'd have to ask them their reasons...I only know such women do exist.

(3) Some cultures like their leaders tough, nasty, and ruthless. Not diplomatic, not eloquent, not sophisticated, but cruel, mean, and fearsome. Why? Perhaps for the sense of protection against other groups. Perhaps that's simply the local cultural ideal of "manliness"-I don't know, you'd have to ask them.....but I do know that millions of such people do exist.

CONCLUSION: You will NEVER, EVER, try as you might, FORCE someone to accept democracy. People who want democracy (like people who like ballet dancing or hang gliding) will come to adopt democracy when they, in their own time, become sick and tired of its alternatives. Trying to INSIST that they accept democracy makes no more sense than INSISTING that a kid try broccoli. It will be accepted and embraced only at such time as the locals want it.
NOTICE, too that we don't seem to waste two words on convincing the Muslim world to adopt Women's Rights. Why is this? Probably because we somehow realize that Islam will adopt Women's Rights at such time as the women of Islam decide they're tired of their present role, and start demanding changes. Until that happens, no army can make them do it....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2007, 01:36 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: State of Superior
2,096 posts, read 1,221,776 times
Reputation: 369
darstar is just really nicedarstar is just really nicedarstar is just really nicedarstar is just really nicedarstar is just really nicedarstar is just really nicedarstar is just really nicedarstar is just really nice
Quote:
Originally Posted by macmeal View Post
(1) Some men like their women "trashy". You may not understand, nor do I. Don't these guys realize they're asking for trouble and heartbreak? Perhaps they enjoy the "adventure" of it all- I don't know; you'd have to ask them their reasons....I only know such men do exist.

(2) Some women like their men "rough". Not nice, not sensitive, not caring, but strong, macho and mean. Why? Oh, I don't know- maybe it makes them feel protected...maybe they get some sort of naughty "thrill"- you'd have to ask them their reasons...I only know such women do exist.

(3) Some cultures like their leaders tough, nasty, and ruthless. Not diplomatic, not eloquent, not sophisticated, but cruel, mean, and fearsome. Why? Perhaps for the sense of protection against other groups. Perhaps that's simply the local cultural ideal of "manliness"-I don't know, you'd have to ask them.....but I do know that millions of such people do exist.

CONCLUSION: You will NEVER, EVER, try as you might, FORCE someone to accept democracy. People who want democracy (like people who like ballet dancing or hang gliding) will come to adopt democracy when they, in their own time, become sick and tired of its alternatives. Trying to INSIST that they accept democracy makes no more sense than INSISTING that a kid try broccoli. It will be accepted and embraced only at such time as the locals want it.
NOTICE, too that we don't seem to waste two words on convincing the Muslim world to adopt Women's Rights. Why is this? Probably because we somehow realize that Islam will adopt Women's Rights at such time as the women of Islam decide they're tired of their present role, and start demanding changes. Until that happens, no army can make them do it....
All this sounds a lot like the Good old USA...these days. There are very few true democracy's. The US is not one of them , we are a republic. The neo-Cons had a plan, to rule the world , they still do. It has nothing to do with a democracy , or womens rights, or whatever...its all about power , and money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2007, 02:21 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
694 posts, read 911,476 times
Reputation: 158
Njrover0216 has a spectacular aura aboutNjrover0216 has a spectacular aura aboutNjrover0216 has a spectacular aura aboutNjrover0216 has a spectacular aura about
I am for the war, however, I am against how it is being handled. We are tip toeing around this person and that person because we do not want to get anyone mad. I think that we first should have settle things in Afagahnistan before rushing into Iraq.
The Iraqi war is a difficult war to fight because the enemy are a bunch of cowards that hide behind everyday normal citizens. There is not a line that says it is blue against red. The people of Iraq are afraid to point out who the insurgents are in fear for their lives. Now we are stuck, if we pull out then we are going to be blamed for Iraqs past and future, if we stay it is going to keep going round and round. I think that we should hold an election for the Iraqi people, does America stay or go? That way the decision is put into their hands.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2007, 02:46 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: State of Superior
2,096 posts, read 1,221,776 times
Reputation: 369
darstar is just really nicedarstar is just really nicedarstar is just really nicedarstar is just really nicedarstar is just really nicedarstar is just really nicedarstar is just really nicedarstar is just really nice
Quote:
Originally Posted by Njrover0216 View Post
I am for the war, however, I am against how it is being handled. We are tip toeing around this person and that person because we do not want to get anyone mad. I think that we first should have settle things in Afagahnistan before rushing into Iraq.
The Iraqi war is a difficult war to fight because the enemy are a bunch of cowards that hide behind everyday normal citizens. There is not a line that says it is blue against red. The people of Iraq are afraid to point out who the insurgents are in fear for their lives. Now we are stuck, if we pull out then we are going to be blamed for Iraqs past and future, if we stay it is going to keep going round and round. I think that we should hold an election for the Iraqi people, does America stay or go? That way the decision is put into their hands.
Sorry , I hate it when they don't play fair , don't you ? Who do they think they are anyway ! Sure , an election is a good idea.....first place to start is right here in the US , maybe an impeachment or two also, don't you think ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2007, 03:18 PM
220 people need to be fired
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: San Antonio
9,762 posts, read 5,071,445 times
Reputation: 1949
rd2007 has a brilliant future
rd2007 has a brilliant futurerd2007 has a brilliant futurerd2007 has a brilliant future
Quote:
Originally Posted by darstar View Post
All this sounds a lot like the Good old USA...these days. There are very few true democracy's. The US is not one of them , we are a republic. The neo-Cons had a plan, to rule the world , they still do. It has nothing to do with a democracy , or womens rights, or whatever...its all about power , and money.
definition, again....
Quote:
Originally Posted by Njrover0216 View Post
I am for the war, however, I am against how it is being handled. We are tip toeing around this person and that person because we do not want to get anyone mad. I think that we first should have settle things in Afagahnistan before rushing into Iraq.
The Iraqi war is a difficult war to fight because the enemy are a bunch of cowards that hide behind everyday normal citizens. There is not a line that says it is blue against red. The people of Iraq are afraid to point out who the insurgents are in fear for their lives. Now we are stuck, if we pull out then we are going to be blamed for Iraqs past and future, if we stay it is going to keep going round and round. I think that we should hold an election for the Iraqi people, does America stay or go? That way the decision is put into their hands.
bingo and bingo, thank you for paying attention
Quote:
Originally Posted by darstar View Post
Sorry , I hate it when they don't play fair , don't you ? Who do they think they are anyway ! Sure , an election is a good idea.....first place to start is right here in the US , maybe an impeachment or two also, don't you think ?
oof, the reason I gave up my Michigan citizenship while I was in the military..
sad thing is I still want to move back there, but I know I'd be in a fight every day in my home town of Ann Arbor...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.



Reply


Quick Reply
Message:

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads


Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:44 AM.

Copyright © 2005-2009, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 - Top