Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The problem is people like you, who believe this 9/11 crap, will never, ever believe the truth, no matter how many times the sound science and simple common sense explanations are offered. You're so devoted to the "I want to believe" mentality that you'll do anything you can to maintain your belief despite all evidence to the contrary.
I think the buildings were poorly constructed. If they had
used concrete to encase the steel we wouldn't be having
this conversation. Thus if the engineers thought the steel
could withstand impact of a plane - was it up to par?
Few Buildings have collapsed if any like this. I simply don't believe the reports as they have been presented. You know the truth - then you must know the buildings were built like crap.
Nah, too busy doing my left-wing thing, undermining Real America by living on the Left Coast and working in Hollywood. Still doesn't change the absence of evidence.
Nah, too busy doing my left-wing thing, undermining Real America by living on the Left Coast and working in Hollywood. Still doesn't change the absence of evidence.
Most criminals look fondly upon absence of evidence.
I think the buildings were poorly constructed. If they had
used concrete to encase the steel we wouldn't be having
this conversation. Thus if the engineers thought the steel
could withstand impact of a plane - was it up to par?
Few Buildings have collapsed if any like this. I simply don't believe the reports as they have been presented. You know the truth - then you must know the buildings were built like crap.
Few buildings have collapsed like this because NONE HAVE BEEN HIT BY PLANES BEFORE!! Holy crap, can it get more simple for you??
Why the flock would anyone have though to build buildings capable of taking a hit by a jet? No one thought of it, especially when the WTC were designed and built in the 60s.
Most criminals look fondly upon absence of evidence.
Even, the destruction of evidence.
That's a joke son, get it?
I got it. How do I get rid of it again? But thanks for the quick demonstration of one of the classical conspiracy theorist fallacies: "The lack of evidence for my foregone conclusion is proof of an effective cover-up. The existence of a cover-up strengthens my position."
Wrong. South Tower (WTC2) collapsed at 0959. North Tower (WTC1) collapsed at 10:28. You can't even get these simple facts straight.
The position has changed. In order to make it look less like a controlled demolition, the collapses were timed to not be exactly 30 minutes apart. Or so I think.
Few buildings have collapsed like this because NONE HAVE BEEN HIT BY PLANES BEFORE!! Holy crap, can it get more simple for you??
Why the flock would anyone have though to build buildings capable of taking a hit by a jet? No one thought of it, especially when the WTC were designed and built in the 60s.
There is no reason that the WTC should have totally
collapsed because a plane hit it. They were designed
for that very reason. Guess why anyone would build
a structure capable of withstanding a plane running into
it has to go back to the 1930's with the Empire State
building. Get a grip.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
