Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-29-2010, 01:08 PM
 
5,346 posts, read 4,045,487 times
Reputation: 545

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by HistorianDude View Post
There is no such thing as a "thermite fragment."

No thermite was found in the collapsed debris.
There is a large amount of thermite in the debris...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-29-2010, 01:15 PM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,070,698 times
Reputation: 3954
Quote:
Originally Posted by HC475 View Post
There is a large amount of thermite in the debris...
There was no thermite in the debris.

1. "Chips" were found that have been identified by a certain set of Truther "scientists" as possibly being some sort of otherwise mysterious "nano-thermitic" material. They have unfortunately and inexplicably failed to perform the single test capable of actually identifying thermite... burning the "chips" in an oxygen free atmosphere.

2. The "chips" are indistinguishable from the primer paint known to have been used on steel support beams of the WTC.

3. Thermite (nano or otherwise) cannot cut vertical steel, and cannot continue "burning" for weeks after use.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2010, 01:17 PM
 
46,943 posts, read 25,964,420 times
Reputation: 29434
Quote:
Originally Posted by HC475 View Post
There is a large amount of thermite in the debris...
You claimed evidence of explosive shaped charges in post #371. Now it's thermite. You're aware those are different substances, right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2010, 02:05 PM
 
15,059 posts, read 8,622,286 times
Reputation: 7411
Quote:
Originally Posted by HistorianDude View Post
There was no thermite in the debris.

1. "Chips" were found that have been identified by a certain set of Truther "scientists" as possibly being some sort of otherwise mysterious "nano-thermitic" material. They have unfortunately and inexplicably failed to perform the single test capable of actually identifying thermite... burning the "chips" in an oxygen free atmosphere.

2. The "chips" are indistinguishable from the primer paint known to have been used on steel support beams of the WTC.
You want people to believe that someone used Nano-Primer paint? Must have been a very expensive paint job!!!

Do you even understand what nano-particles are? They cannot be found at Sherwin Williams.

Normal oxidation doesn't create nano-rust particles ... that could attach itself to primer paint that doesn't consist of nano-paint particles ... nor would there be a nano sized silica layer between the elements, including elemental aluminum.

And I do believe the 9 physicists and chemists who analyzed the material can tell the difference between manufactured nano-thermite and paint chips

And it's been addressed:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kDPuy...2D7E18&index=8

Quote:
Originally Posted by HistorianDude View Post
3. Thermite (nano or otherwise) cannot cut vertical steel, and cannot continue "burning" for weeks after use.
Says who? YOU? Ever heard of a thermitic lances? They are commonly used to cut steel.

And, much to the contrary, thermitic reaction is the only thing that can account for weeks of burning without open air sources of oxygen .... not office materials and jet fuel. You've got it completely backwards ... just as everything else you post. Thermitic reaction uses the oxygen contained in the iron oxide to provide the oxygen to burn ... which allows it to burn under water .... or burn under oxygen smothering tons of debris.

The fact is ... even your government shill frauds claim that the cut columns seen at the WTC cite were cut with thermitic lances used IN CLEAN UP ... but also contend that thermitic cutting of steel isn't possible ... just as you regurgitate here .... you can't have it both ways.

Put thermite on steel and it will destroy the steel .... whether you call it cutting or melting it in half is just a matter of semantics.

Burn in two .. or cut in two .... same result.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2010, 02:41 PM
 
5,346 posts, read 4,045,487 times
Reputation: 545
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dane_in_LA View Post
You claimed evidence of explosive shaped charges in post #371. Now it's thermite. You're aware those are different substances, right?
Why don't you explain what the explosions were at WTC 7 in post #371...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2010, 02:45 PM
 
5,346 posts, read 4,045,487 times
Reputation: 545
Quote:
Originally Posted by HistorianDude View Post
I would say that you have never touched an explosive demolition in your life.
I don't have to...

Notice the music track at the very beginning and the feedback sound effect at the very end... Because the sound of broken glass is harder to replicate so they decided to use feedback effect to cover up the original sound track during the last few seconds...



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FOGI33HsiCc&NR=1


Now the original un-altered video with the original sound track... Notice the explosions during the collapse are evident... At the very end you hear the broken glass... which was covered up in the above fake sound track video...



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jyWoWWX6YtA&feature=related


You now have both the fake sound track video and the original video...

Case Closed...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2010, 03:13 PM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,471,329 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by HC475 View Post
Then explain how the Thermite fragments in the collapsed debris got there...
first you tell me what thermite is......


before you do....... you better use the words ...white phosphorus aka "WP", and "Willy/Willie Pete/Peter"

the base of thermite...then you add the metal

The oxidizers can be boron(III) oxide, silicon(IV) oxide, chromium(III) oxide, manganese(IV) oxide, iron(III) oxide, iron(II,III) oxide, copper(II) oxide, and lead(II,III,IV) oxide.[1]

The most common thermite is aluminium-iron(III) oxide.

the mix in gypsum (aka wallboard)





now show me ONE 'fragment' that they found that wasnt actually part of the WTC


bet you cant
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2010, 03:16 PM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,471,329 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by GuyNTexas View Post
And it is NOT "RESIDUE" it consists of actual samples of un-ignited pieces of nano-thermitic material analyzed under an electron microscope that shows a manufactured material that should not be present, nor it's presence explained.
wow 'dr' steven jones...a FIRED (from BYU) 'dr' in THEOLOGY, ..'thinks' he finds a 'thermite' speare...aka a paint chip...and you guys fall for that garbage
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2010, 03:16 PM
 
5,346 posts, read 4,045,487 times
Reputation: 545
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
first you tell me what thermite is......


before you do....... you better use the words ...white phosphorus aka "WP", and "Willy/Willie Pete/Peter"

the base of thermite...then you add the metal

The oxidizers can be boron(III) oxide, silicon(IV) oxide, chromium(III) oxide, manganese(IV) oxide, iron(III) oxide, iron(II,III) oxide, copper(II) oxide, and lead(II,III,IV) oxide.[1]

The most common thermite is aluminium-iron(III) oxide.

the mix in gypsum (aka wallboard)





now show me ONE 'fragment' that they found that wasnt actually part of the WTC


bet you cant
Well... Let's see... I don't have samples from the WTC... Do you have samples?...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2010, 03:19 PM
 
46,943 posts, read 25,964,420 times
Reputation: 29434
Quote:
Originally Posted by HC475 View Post
Why don't you explain what the explosions were at WTC 7 in post #371...
I believe I asked first.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:10 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top