U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-30-2010, 11:46 AM
 
1,545 posts, read 2,057,083 times
Reputation: 117

Advertisements

Malcom X wanted separation, Australian Indigenous and Origines want separation, sovereignty, treaty.

Why do white genocidal nations want integration and soft slavery?

Why cannot we bring any white genocidal nations to the world court?

Quote:
Collective Human Experience

'We're all in the same boat and we all are going to catch the same hell from the same man. He just happens to be a white man. All of us have suffered here, in this country, political oppression at the hands of the white man, economic exploitation at the hands of the white man, and social degradation at the hands of the white man.

Now in speaking like this, it doesn't mean that we're anti-white, but it does mean we're anti-exploitation, we're anti-degradation, we're anti-oppression. And if the white man doesn't want us to be anti-him, let him stop oppressing and exploiting and degrading us. Whether we are Christians or Muslims or nationalists or agnostics or atheists, we must first learn to forget our differences' -Malcom X

Philosophical Nationalism - Kangaroo Court Australia

*audio, listen to the greatness of the man
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-30-2010, 12:01 PM
 
10,963 posts, read 8,050,377 times
Reputation: 3119
Quote:
Originally Posted by expat007 View Post
Malcom X wanted separation, Australian Indigenous and Origines want separation, sovereignty, treaty.

Why do white genocidal nations want integration and soft slavery?

Why cannot we bring any white genocidal nations to the world court?



Philosophical Nationalism - Kangaroo Court Australia

*audio, listen to the greatness of the man
Malcolm X has been dead for the better part of 45 years. Most Black Americans just want fair and equal treatment under the law. There is no large movement of Black Americans that want to separate themselves from the United States.

If you want to separate from the United States there are several countries willing to accommodate you. Find one and knock yourself out.


So what's you point?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2010, 12:06 PM
 
1,545 posts, read 2,057,083 times
Reputation: 117
Welcome to Australia circa 1964 AmeriKKKa

Judge rules 'N-word' not offensive


A QUEENSLAND judge has found the terms "******" and "sand******" are not offensive to a reasonable person.

Judge rules 'N-word' not offensive | News.com.au

Read My Lips: Is It Unlawful Racial Discrimination To Deprive The Indigenous Peoples Of The Racial Discrimination Act - Kangaroo Court Australia

PS why does city-data have the N word censored??

Last edited by Green Irish Eyes; 11-30-2010 at 05:17 PM.. Reason: There are language filters in place for a reason, please do not try to circumvent them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2010, 12:24 PM
 
10,963 posts, read 8,050,377 times
Reputation: 3119
Quote:
Originally Posted by expat007 View Post
Welcome to Australia circa 1964 AmeriKKKa

Judge rules 'N-word' not offensive


A QUEENSLAND judge has found the terms "******" and "sand******" are not offensive to a reasonable person.

Judge rules 'N-word' not offensive | News.com.au

Read My Lips: Is It Unlawful Racial Discrimination To Deprive The Indigenous Peoples Of The Racial Discrimination Act - Kangaroo Court Australia

PS why does city-data have the N word censored??

There is no criminal charge in the United States for using the "N" word either.

So what is your point?

People in the United States generally find the "N" word offensive. Apparently plenty of people in Austrialia also find the "N" word offenslve also. One legal ruling by this judge does NOT represent the entire spectrum of thinking on this issue by people in Australia.

Here is a comment from the article on www.news.com.au

Quote:
Mr O'Driscoll ruled that Mr Mulheron's words were not enough to invoke criminal sanctions.

"The words used were crude, unattractive and direct but were not offensive to a reasonable person," he said.

But he made it clear the court in no way condoned Mr Mulheron's comments.


Queensland Premier Anna Bligh said the use of the term "******" is highly offensive and has no place in modern Australia.

Last edited by Green Irish Eyes; 11-30-2010 at 05:17 PM.. Reason: Edited quoted text
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2010, 12:32 PM
 
1,545 posts, read 2,057,083 times
Reputation: 117
and here s a complaint to the inept human rights commission

Read My Lips: Is It Unlawful Racial Discrimination To Deprive The Indigenous Peoples Of The Racial Discrimination Act - Kangaroo Court Australia

there is a criminal charge for harass with intent to incite (?), thats what the charge came under, but if a judge makes that decision, i would take action as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2010, 01:03 PM
 
6,555 posts, read 9,068,716 times
Reputation: 2837
Quote:
Originally Posted by expat007 View Post
Malcom X wanted separation
Keep in mind the context of his era. During Malcolm's time legal segregation was around and intergration hadn't happened yet so back then the idea of seperation did make sense to some people. But intergration and other civil rights laws eventually came. Also some of Malcolm's views changed on race after visiting Mecca.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2010, 01:08 PM
 
1,545 posts, read 2,057,083 times
Reputation: 117
Quote:
Originally Posted by Motion View Post
Keep in mind the context of his era. During Malcolm's time legal segregation was around and intergration hadn't happened yet so back then the idea of seperation did make sense to some people. But intergration and other civil rights laws eventually came. Also some of Malcolm's views changed on race after visiting Mecca.
Integration for the Australian Indigenous peoples, means "breeding out the black" of White Australia Policy.

Giving up sovereignty, treaty and getting screwed by judges, when Captain Cook was told to gain permission to settle on Australia.

Australian convicts found a way to steal land by integrating the owners of the lands into their slaves LOL.

just by giving them votes
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2010, 01:37 PM
 
Location: Spokane via Sydney,Australia
6,611 posts, read 11,296,242 times
Reputation: 3097
Quote:
Originally Posted by expat007 View Post
Malcom X wanted separation, Australian Indigenous and Origines want separation, sovereignty, treaty.

Why do white genocidal nations want integration and soft slavery?

Why cannot we bring any white genocidal nations to the world court?



Philosophical Nationalism - Kangaroo Court Australia

*audio, listen to the greatness of the man

WHAT the F*** is an Origine ?????????????

I"m guessing you meant ABORIGINE - jeeez man, you try to link Kooris (Australian Indigenous peoples) to Malcolm X and you can't even get the WORD right? I'm also guessing you swallow what's written on sites such as the one you cited hook line and sinker.

EPIC FAIL
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2010, 01:44 PM
 
Location: Spokane via Sydney,Australia
6,611 posts, read 11,296,242 times
Reputation: 3097
Quote:
Originally Posted by expat007 View Post
Integration for the Australian Indigenous peoples, means "breeding out the black" of White Australia Policy.

Giving up sovereignty, treaty and getting screwed by judges, when Captain Cook was told to gain permission to settle on Australia.

Australian convicts found a way to steal land by integrating the owners of the lands into their slaves LOL.

just by giving them votes

fwiw sweetie, the White Australia Policy so-called (which was rescinded in 1973 btw) was regarding non white IMMIGRATION, zero, nada, zilch to do with Australian Aboriginals.

Too bad you've just swallowed the KoolAid whole and asked for seconds.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2010, 01:56 PM
 
1,545 posts, read 2,057,083 times
Reputation: 117
Ab (NOT) Original
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top