Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I wouldn't either, just don't expect taxpayer funds to pay for such garbage.
This particular piece does look like garbage to me but I am not an aesthetic person to judge perhaps. Many art pieces look like garbage/worthless to many folks. I just say that I may not appreciate this aesthetically today.
Depiction of Jesus on a Cross may be as offensive to many, and frankly where is art in that? That is why I asked why depict Jesus on a Cross for the said taxpayer money. Especically since many taxpayers are either atheist, or non-christian.
Going with your argument then - Why then have ANY depiction of a Christian diety as an art, or part of art (ie a Renaissance painting/sculpture) since the taxpayers are not necessarily Christian.
An atheist would be offended going by YOUR logic by many old masterpieces... Yet, they are not, they are able to appreciate beauty and skill and, ... yes ART.
any fool who wants to aesthetically view this garbage should be able to.On their own dime not the taxpayers.next we will be paying for their porno movies as ART. sickos
any fool who wants to aesthetically view this garbage should be able to.On their own dime not the taxpayers.next we will be paying for their porno movies as ART. sickos
Atheist, and non-Christian taxpayers pay for displaying OFFENSIVE TO THEM perhaps pieces of art.
Get the Christian mega churches to foot the bills for any piece of art depicting Jesus/Mary/etc... Heck pay for Da Vinci's 'obscene' depiction of 'heaven', while you are at it.
Porno? Many classic paintings and sculptures (from ancient Greeks no less!) were actually classified as "porno" in the 50s.
Atheist, and non-Christian taxpayers pay for displaying OFFENSIVE TO THEM perhaps pieces of art.
Get the Christian mega churches to foot the bills for any piece of art depicting Jesus/Mary/etc... Heck pay for Da Vinci's 'obscene' depiction of 'heaven', while you are at it.
Porno? Many classic paintings and sculptures (from ancient Greeks no less!) were actually classified as "porno" in the 50s.
I dont care what you want to view or how you want to classify it just pay for it yourself .you people have perverted art and make believe you know art.I am an artist,and dumping ants on something is not art
I dont care what you want to view or how you want to classify it just pay for it yourself .you people have perverted art and make believe you know art.I am an artist,and dumping ants on something is not art
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Do you have another link?
