Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-10-2010, 07:26 AM
 
1,544 posts, read 2,270,145 times
Reputation: 117

Advertisements

Wikileaks have released some documents that shed light on the veiled secrecy of international diplomacy.

But really nothing earth-shattering.

Just wondering if Assange is set up as a "pansy" for the New World Order?

To apply harsher Patriot Act......

Btw, hows the government liking it being used on them?

How would George Orwell paint it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-10-2010, 07:50 AM
 
1,476 posts, read 2,024,949 times
Reputation: 704
Yes. I believe it is. If you look at the Van Jones video,posted yesterday (Top Down Bottom Up Inside Out) it identifies the need to control the Media in order for any real change to occur.

It is also bizarre that all the focus is on Assange rather than on the private who apparently obtained the information. Why isn't there more outrage at how our government can't better protect this "highly classified" secret information? That is where the focus should be. Not on the publishing of it. Something is just not right, here and there is more than meets the eye.

Hopefully, Americans will maintain their cool and not succumb to outrageous calls for more censorship.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2010, 07:58 AM
 
Location: Blankity-blank!
11,446 posts, read 16,185,973 times
Reputation: 6958
If the internet is censored some Americans may mumble and grumble,but nothing more. Americans don't like the word 'censorship', but will support the action if told that it's necessary for national security.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2010, 07:59 AM
 
1,544 posts, read 2,270,145 times
Reputation: 117
Nothing really interesting from Israel either on the Wikileaks, hmmmmmm
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2010, 07:59 AM
 
3,128 posts, read 6,534,516 times
Reputation: 1599
The wrong questions are being asked with Wikileaks....yup more control over the people. Sad.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2010, 08:08 AM
 
1,476 posts, read 2,024,949 times
Reputation: 704
Quote:
Originally Posted by RandyWatson13 View Post
The wrong questions are being asked with Wikileaks....yup more control over the people. Sad.
I agree. The real questions should center around how in the world could an army private get his hands on such sensitive material. Doesn't seem like he could do it alone. But instead the focus is all on the left's other patsy who publishes the information so we can all cry, "We need more censorship!" When what we should be crying is, "We need a government who can or WILL protect our Top Secret Info. (if it truly is) effectively.

Don't succumb to it. Mass Censorship is not the answer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2010, 08:11 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,481,831 times
Reputation: 27720
The USG cannot control the internet though. It's bigger than what they can do.
The best they can do is institute the Great Firewall like China but there will always be hackers to create loopholes.

The internet is a monster they cannot control.

Thanks to wikileaks there are several projects now working on alternates to DNS servers owned by corporates and collecting money from it.
Thanks to DHS and ICE shutting down websites there are projects springing up to continue the free flow of information on the internet. BTW..DHS also shut down websites that were selling nothing; they were torrent search engines and got caught up in the sweep.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2010, 08:13 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,481,831 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by GottaBMe View Post
I agree. The real questions should center around how in the world could an army private get his hands on such sensitive material. Doesn't seem like he could do it alone. But instead the focus is all on the left's other patsy who publishes the information so we can all cry, "We need more censorship!" When what we should be crying is, "We need a government who can or WILL protect our Top Secret Info. (if it truly is) effectively.

Don't succumb to it. Mass Censorship is not the answer.
In the bigger scope of things..they are not really that sensitive; more embarassing and shows corruption, greed and much bribery going on rather than war plans or strategies.

Over 5 million people have access to those documents..over 5 million people. The government is too big to manage itself IMO.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2010, 08:13 AM
 
Location: Full Time: N.NJ Part Time: S.CA, ID
6,116 posts, read 12,599,484 times
Reputation: 8687
Quote:
Originally Posted by GottaBMe View Post
It is also bizarre that all the focus is on Assange rather than on the private who apparently obtained the information. Why isn't there more outrage at how our government can't better protect this "highly classified" secret information?
Good point. Without a leak from the Gov, we wouldn't be having this discussion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2010, 08:13 AM
 
13,186 posts, read 14,978,392 times
Reputation: 4555
Quote:
Originally Posted by expat007 View Post
Wikileaks have released some documents that shed light on the veiled secrecy of international diplomacy.

But really nothing earth-shattering.

Just wondering if Assange is set up as a "pansy" for the New World Order?

To apply harsher Patriot Act......

Btw, hows the government liking it being used on them?

How would George Orwell paint it?
What would be earth shattering?

This Nation is corrupt. There is nothing the Government could do that would be considered "earth shattering".

These latest leaks show that we've broken treaties, lied to the US public about US military attacks in Yemen, bullied European countries into not investigating torture allegations from their own citizens.

95% of people don't care.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:45 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top