Quote:
Originally Posted by sindey
Do you honestly believe that they want this just so they can reduce your rates? LOL
|
LOL, indeed. You should actually read what you're replying to - it makes for a better conversation.
I already covered this. Every discount an insurance company (or any other company, for that matter) offers their customers is expected to provide that business with a return of equal or greater value. That value could be a direct monetary value (e.g. multiple vehicle discounts), or it could be something non-tangible, such as increasing their customer retention rate (e.g. loyalty discounts).
In this case, they're better able to identify who the riskier policy holders are. If you feel you're a safe driver, and you don't mind demonstrating that to them, they're willing to give you a break on your rate. That's somehow wrong?
I'm sure that they'll also be aggregating the data from all the participants to get a better feel for how people drive in general, which is probably where the most value lies for the company. I'd also wager that this would be the part of the program with which you have the most concern. Ironically, it's the part where your identity is no longer important, and you're just another number thrown into the cruncher. Insurance companies are in the business of assessing risk - that's
ALL they do. Data like that could prove very useful for that purpose.
So tell me - what
precisely is your concern here? How do you see that information being used against you? Be specific - I don't want to read any more hazy paranoia. If you're genuinely concerned, you should be able to articulate why.
Oh, and as for questioning the government et al, I'm all for it. Abuse can and does happen, and it needs to be kept in check. In this case, I read the OP, considered what they were doing, and reached a different conclusion than you did. I've explained my position pretty thoroughly. I'm still waiting for you to explain yours.