Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-16-2010, 09:31 AM
 
Location: Massapequa Park
3,172 posts, read 6,743,853 times
Reputation: 1374

Advertisements

New report calls for online privacy bill of rights - Yahoo! Finance (http://finance.yahoo.com/news/New-report-calls-for-online-apf-4060122555.html?x=0&sec=topStories&pos=7&asset=&cc ode= - broken link)

tell them to keep their stinkin paws away from the net. Before you know it, you will need a license just to go on the net and comply with 15 different regulations to run a blog or website.

Quote:
he proposal, outlined in a Commerce Department report Thursday, is intended to address growing unease about the vast amounts of personal information that companies are scooping up on the Net -- from Web browsing habits to smart phone locations to Facebook preferences. That data is often mined to target advertising.
O Please!! Give me a break, who here has "unease" about their vast amounts of personal information ?? what a friggin farce, they are making sh1t up to force feed you a "bill of rights" when the internet works just fine for us. As if people don't know how to turn their cookies off. What a joke! We are not sheeple, people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-16-2010, 09:54 AM
 
13,684 posts, read 9,003,085 times
Reputation: 10405
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pequaman View Post
New report calls for online privacy bill of rights - Yahoo! Finance (http://finance.yahoo.com/news/New-report-calls-for-online-apf-4060122555.html?x=0&sec=topStories&pos=7&asset=&cc ode= - broken link)

tell them to keep their stinkin paws away from the net. Before you know it, you will need a license just to go on the net and comply with 15 different regulations to run a blog or website.



O Please!! Give me a break, who here has "unease" about their vast amounts of personal information ?? what a friggin farce, they are making sh1t up to force feed you a "bill of rights" when the internet works just fine for us. As if people don't know how to turn their cookies off. What a joke! We are not sheeple, people.

Educate yourself before ranting.

People who use the phrase 'sheeple' are, in my experience, some of the worse 'followers' around.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-16-2010, 10:18 AM
 
243 posts, read 274,768 times
Reputation: 131
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pequaman View Post
New report calls for online privacy bill of rights - Yahoo! Finance (http://finance.yahoo.com/news/New-report-calls-for-online-apf-4060122555.html?x=0&sec=topStories&pos=7&asset=&cc ode= - broken link)

tell them to keep their stinkin paws away from the net. Before you know it, you will need a license just to go on the net and comply with 15 different regulations to run a blog or website.



O Please!! Give me a break, who here has "unease" about their vast amounts of personal information ?? what a friggin farce, they are making sh1t up to force feed you a "bill of rights" when the internet works just fine for us. As if people don't know how to turn their cookies off. What a joke! We are not sheeple, people.
I agree it's not about "rights" at all, it's just a way to begin restrictions. They can't come right out and say they want to shut people up so they use the back door approach.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-16-2010, 11:10 AM
 
Location: Massapequa Park
3,172 posts, read 6,743,853 times
Reputation: 1374
Quote:
Originally Posted by legalsea View Post
Educate yourself before ranting.

People who use the phrase 'sheeple' are, in my experience, some of the worse 'followers' around.
what part of the highlighted sticking points did you miss??:
Quote:
It would also set clearer limits on the use of this information and would require companies to secure the data they gather.

In addition to these broad principles, the Commerce Department also envisions specific codes of conduct for particular segments of the Internet ecosystem. Those could include social network sites, services that deliver location-based pitches to mobile devices and Web publishers and marketers that target ads based on a consumer's browsing activity and other online behavior.

Those codes of conduct would be voluntary, but enforceable. The FTC could take actions against companies that commit to abiding by the codes and then don't comply.
More regulation of the internet will not improve anything. "FTC could take actions" is a slippery slope to full blown laws and regulations online. Want to start a website or blog? Pay the license fee and register with the FTC. Want to post content on internet message boards? please provide C-D with your Social security # and legal name address phone. No thank you, everyone with some net-sense sees where it's headed. Everything the gov't touches gets ruined, censored, more expensive, more layers of paperwork to comply with the new regulations. All in the name of "internet bill of rights", my ass. They love to take away any type of freedom of speech.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-16-2010, 11:35 AM
 
Location: West Coast of Europe
25,947 posts, read 24,731,689 times
Reputation: 9728
In the end the privacy abuse on the Internet is the reason that makes some worried people think of ways to protect users in the first place. Unfortunately, there are a lot of companies out there whose self-imposed privacy policies are not worth a dime.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-16-2010, 11:43 AM
 
45,201 posts, read 26,417,923 times
Reputation: 24964
The notion that government via the FTC can somehow guarantee privacy through layers of bureaucracy and wrongheaded rules is a complete joke, unless you just want a quick warm fuzzy.
It also opens the door to more overreach, as is generally the rule when government sets out to make things "safer" or better for us helpless peasant's.
If people are that concerned, they can simply log-off and go about their lives.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-16-2010, 11:49 AM
 
Location: Tyler, TX
23,854 posts, read 24,091,732 times
Reputation: 15123
Remember the CAN-SPAM act?

There are also some pretty heavy data security regulations for any website that accepts credit cards.

Ask your ISP about data retention laws...

There are already a lot of laws that involve the Internet. I won't comment on this one, as I haven't looked into it at all, but your perception that this is something new is way off the mark.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-16-2010, 12:29 PM
 
Location: OCEAN BREEZES AND VIEWS SAN CLEMENTE
19,893 posts, read 18,436,651 times
Reputation: 6465
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pequaman View Post
what part of the highlighted sticking points did you miss??:


More regulation of the internet will not improve anything. "FTC could take actions" is a slippery slope to full blown laws and regulations online. Want to start a website or blog? Pay the license fee and register with the FTC. Want to post content on internet message boards? please provide C-D with your Social security # and legal name address phone. No thank you, everyone with some net-sense sees where it's headed. Everything the gov't touches gets ruined, censored, more expensive, more layers of paperwork to comply with the new regulations. All in the name of "internet bill of rights", my ass. They love to take away any type of freedom of speech.
I agree with you! your right, do we really need more regulation of the internet. Or is this another way to gain more Control!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-16-2010, 12:33 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,081,664 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by legalsea View Post
Educate yourself before ranting.

People who use the phrase 'sheeple' are, in my experience, some of the worse 'followers' around.
Did you have anything of substance to add to the topic?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pequaman View Post
New report calls for online privacy bill of rights - Yahoo! Finance (http://finance.yahoo.com/news/New-report-calls-for-online-apf-4060122555.html?x=0&sec=topStories&pos=7&asset=&cc ode= - broken link)

tell them to keep their stinkin paws away from the net. Before you know it, you will need a license just to go on the net and comply with 15 different regulations to run a blog or website.
I said right here on cd that this was coming about 6 months ago when teh federal government started moving the internet under the same regulations as television.. Somewhere down the road, porn will be next.. Unregulated home porn that can be accessed by 10 year olds will be their excuse.. And if you dont agree that porn should be limited, then you support raping little children.. Watch, that'll be their argument..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-16-2010, 01:01 PM
 
Location: Hades
2,126 posts, read 2,381,089 times
Reputation: 682
It needs regulation. Somebody's got to do it. That said, don't know if Gov is the right body, but I am all for increased regulation of the internet. What is the alternative to not regulating? Obviously, the feds and whoever else are out on countless sites monitoring for offenders of various types. The internet is a ripe place for criminal activity. I don't understand why people would be upset that it is increasingly monitored. If you're not into shady shi*, why worry?

I doubt it will come to a point where Americans need to comply with 15 regulations just to run a blog or website, but could it come to a point where people are actually held accountable for their actions- including spreading hate, threats or vile material online? Perhaps. One can always look to countries with even stricter censorship policies to realize that Americans have it very 'loosey goosey" when it comes to internet freedom. If you're doing weird shi#, someone might be watching you, for sure, but no one is clamping down on your so called "freedom to speak." It could be worse.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top