Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-20-2010, 09:28 AM
 
Location: Owasso, OK
1,224 posts, read 3,999,163 times
Reputation: 1147

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by GottaBMe View Post
Yes she did. Watch the video. Read the article linked.

"I was at - forgive the expression - a Christmas Party," NPR reporter Nina Totenberg interjected from a common description for a common event,..."

This is how revisionist history gets started. Ridiculous. Either it was a "Christmas" Party or it wasn't.
Don't you think she might have meant this as a "tongue-in-cheek" statement? That's what it sounds like to me. This whole war on Christmas bullsh*t is just getting riduculous... from both sides.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-20-2010, 09:30 AM
 
Location: Inland Levy County, FL
8,806 posts, read 6,107,072 times
Reputation: 2949
Quote:
Originally Posted by wade52 View Post
Dear militant Christians:

Please get over yourselves.

Lots of people around the world are celebrating this holiday season. And they have for thousands of years before one of your long forgotten popes 1700 years ago decided to hogpile Jesus' birthday on top of the pre-existing traditional holiday.

It isn't all about you and it never has been. In the spirit of the season, please stow your phony outrage.

Peace on earth, not war on xmas.
So apologizing for saying "Christmas party" or heck, apologizing for even being at a Christmas party is okay for a publicly funded station? Why is that something to apologize for? It has nothing to do with being Christian, it's a ridiculous thing for someone to apologize for and speaks VOLUMES as to NPR's ulterior motives. They are just so out in left field (pun intended).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2010, 09:32 AM
 
Location: Albuquerque, NM
13,285 posts, read 15,296,560 times
Reputation: 6658
Quote:
Originally Posted by GottaBMe View Post
I think so. This isn't privately owned Trader Joe's. This is publicly funded, National Public Radio. They are APOLOGIZING for using the word, CHRISTMAS, as if it were a derogatory word or a word not allowed; i.e., censored. Face it. NPR is no longer a free media representing ALL the people. They support censorship. Public funding needs to be withdrawn.
Was she censored?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2010, 09:32 AM
 
Location: On the "Left Coast", somewhere in "the Land of Fruits & Nuts"
8,852 posts, read 10,451,396 times
Reputation: 6670
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wapasha View Post
“I was at – forgive the expression – a Christmas party,†NPR reporter Nina Totenberg interjected on Inside Washington in the weekend’s oddest cautionary separation from a common description for a common event, seemingly embarrassed to invoke any religious terminology for Christmas.

Read more: Nina Totenberg:
Sheesh, this was clearly a "tongue in cheek" reference... stop with the pettiness and giving Christianity a bad name!

BTW, speaking of "cheeks", whatever happened to that injunction to "turn the other one" when "offended"?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2010, 09:32 AM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,694,120 times
Reputation: 35920
Quote:
Originally Posted by andrea3821 View Post
So apologizing for saying "Christmas party" or heck, apologizing for even being at a Christmas party is okay for a publicly funded station? Why is that something to apologize for? It has nothing to do with being Christian, it's a ridiculous thing for someone to apologize for and speaks VOLUMES as to NPR's ulterior motives. They are just so out in left field (pun intended).
Maybe it was a joke. Ya think?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2010, 09:34 AM
 
Location: Blankity-blank!
11,446 posts, read 16,179,956 times
Reputation: 6958
Quote:
Originally Posted by GottaBMe View Post
This is truly Political Correctness gone Wild!

NPR Reporter Apologizes for Saying ‘Christmas’ On Air | The Blaze

Another reason I don't even want to listen to NPR anymore, let alone fund it.
Sure is odd, considering that many NPR personalities are Jewish.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2010, 09:34 AM
 
13,648 posts, read 20,767,629 times
Reputation: 7650
Quote:
Originally Posted by Milleka View Post
Don't you think she might have meant this as a "tongue-in-cheek" statement? That's what it sounds like to me. This whole war on Christmas bullsh*t is just getting riduculous... from both sides.
Yea I think she was simply being ironic for a laugh.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2010, 09:35 AM
 
1,476 posts, read 2,024,110 times
Reputation: 704
Quote:
Originally Posted by wade52 View Post
Dear militant Christians:

Please get over yourselves.

Lots of people around the world are celebrating this holiday season. And they have for thousands of years before one of your long forgotten popes 1700 years ago decided to hogpile Jesus' birthday on top of the pre-existing traditional holiday.

It isn't all about you and it never has been. In the spirit of the season, please stow your phony outrage.

Peace on earth, not war on xmas.
This is not about Trader Joe's saying, "Happy Holidays," vs "Merry Christmas."

This is about a publicly funded news source apologizing for using the word, "Christmas," to relay an event; i.e., a Christmas Party she attended. This is absurdly rude and intolerant behavior. Religious persecution anyone? What if she had apologized for saying the word, "Hannukah," or "Kwanza," or "Pagen," or "Vegan," or "Biker" or "Climate Change," or "Gay," Party? This is not acceptable for any of these groups to be so disparaged. This is not a media that is free and representative of all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2010, 09:35 AM
 
19,226 posts, read 15,314,292 times
Reputation: 2337
Quote:
Originally Posted by andrea3821 View Post
So apologizing for saying "Christmas party" or heck, apologizing for even being at a Christmas party is okay for a publicly funded station? Why is that something to apologize for? It has nothing to do with being Christian, it's a ridiculous thing for someone to apologize for and speaks VOLUMES as to NPR's ulterior motives. They are just so out in left field (pun intended).

Was she acting under orders, under ideology or on her own?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2010, 09:36 AM
NCN
 
Location: NC/SC Border Patrol
21,662 posts, read 25,617,651 times
Reputation: 24373
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katiana View Post
Maybe it was a joke. Ya think?
So you think Christmas is a joke? Talk about being offensive!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:21 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top