Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-26-2010, 07:24 PM
 
Location: NW Las Vegas - Lone Mountain
15,756 posts, read 38,197,261 times
Reputation: 2661

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Yes, I do, which is why I surely don't want to see this happening in the U.S.:BBC NEWS | UK | Wales | Waiting list times 'falling'

Note that even in the case that everyone agrees cardiac surgery is necessary, one must wait 3 years to get the much-needed surgery performed.

Misleading. The wait times are extreme to the point of being newsworthy and they are the exception rather than the rule. The vast majority of heart conditions get treated on an emergency basis which is close to immediately.

So what is really going on is that the at risk heart patients get seen very quickly as they are considered an emergency. Routine stuff suffers as a result. The normal UK times for a non-emergency cardiologist visit are well under 90 days...Wales is (or rather was) scewed up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-26-2010, 07:56 PM
 
Location: Central Maine
4,697 posts, read 6,447,121 times
Reputation: 5047
Perhaps it might be helpful to see what the Medicare regulation actually says.

See: Annual Wellness Visit (AWV), Including Personalized Prevention Plan Services (PPPS) - Dec. 3, 2010.
2. Annual Wellness Visit (AWV)

Effective January 1, 2011, Section 4103 of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), allows for a preventive physical examination, called the annual wellness visit (AWV), and includes personal prevention plan services (PPPS). The AWV is a new annual Medicare preventive physical examination, available for eligible beneficiaries, and identified by new HCPCS codes G0438 (Annual wellness visit, including PPPS, first visit) and G0439 (Annual wellness visit, including PPPS, subsequent visit). Definitions relative to the AWV are included at Pub. 100-02, Medicare Benefit Policy Manual, chapter 15, section 280.5.
This goes on for a while, listing the different items that can be included in this annual wellness visit, and includes:
Voluntary advance care planning upon agreement with the individual, ...
1. It's probably important to point out that this is a VOLUNTARY service provided via Medicare. If you're on Medicare and you're not interested in end-of-life planning, that's your call.

2. If you do avail yourself of such planning, you call the shots.

3. And when you call the shots, you will be much better informed about various options ... options that you get to choose.

Life is not a soundbite, people, no matter how much so-called "leaders" on the right would have you believe that it is. Research, read for yourself, and make up your own damn mind.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-26-2010, 08:39 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,000 posts, read 44,804,275 times
Reputation: 13698
Quote:
Originally Posted by olecapt View Post
Misleading. The wait times are extreme to the point of being newsworthy and they are the exception rather than the rule.
Incorrect. The heart surgeon lays out EXACTLY the time frame in which the steps to treatment take place. For those who seem to have a hard time comprehending what they read, I'll post it again:
Quote:
"Dr Liam Penny: "The waiting list to see a cardiologist is 18 months.
"Once seen by a cardiologist, the waiting time to have the investigations is six months, and only then can the patients get on the waiting list for cardiac surgery.
"It's true that no-one is waiting over 10 months for surgery but the big problem is that the patient has to wait two years to get on that list. "It means it's nearly three years in total - that's a lot of uncertainty and ill-health for people."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-26-2010, 08:50 PM
 
Location: NW Las Vegas - Lone Mountain
15,756 posts, read 38,197,261 times
Reputation: 2661
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Incorrect. The heart surgeon lays out EXACTLY the time frame in which the steps to treatment take place. For those who seem to have a hard time comprehending what they read, I'll post it again:
That is for a non-emergency situation. Read my lips "non-emergency"

It is also five years ago...

It was also newsworthy.

You really think they let heart attack victims lay there for a year?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-26-2010, 08:57 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,000 posts, read 44,804,275 times
Reputation: 13698
Quote:
Originally Posted by olecapt View Post
That is for a non-emergency situation. Read my lips "non-emergency"
Incorrect. The heart surgeon made no indication whatsoever that the 3 year wait for heart surgery was for non-emergency cases only. He quite clearly was talking about patients with heart problems in need of heart surgery.

Why would anyone have heart surgery unless it was absolutely a matter of life or death?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-26-2010, 09:22 PM
 
29,939 posts, read 39,458,172 times
Reputation: 4799
They never left. Only the retarded managed to think they weren't now the option through "health care reform".

I mean how much full-proof actual evidence do you need from the systems you're so readily to adopt?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-26-2010, 09:28 PM
 
Location: NW Las Vegas - Lone Mountain
15,756 posts, read 38,197,261 times
Reputation: 2661
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Incorrect. The heart surgeon made no indication whatsoever that the 3 year wait for heart surgery was for non-emergency cases only. He quite clearly was talking about patients with heart problems in need of heart surgery.

Why would anyone have heart surgery unless it was absolutely a matter of life or death?
Then you ought to be able to pull up dozen of pictures of all the dead heart attack victims in all the English emergency rooms. One does not survive such things without cardio treatment involving cardiologists and surgeons. I speak from personal experience.

The saddest thing is that you can actually believe something so stupid simply because it fits your political preconceptions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-26-2010, 09:34 PM
 
Location: FL
20,702 posts, read 12,530,402 times
Reputation: 5452
Quote:
Originally Posted by Memphis1979 View Post
Doctors have been choosing what procedures are needed, can't be done, or when its time to give up the ghost since we've had witch doctors.

Someone who is 90 years old doesn't need a heat transplant if their liver is failing also.

"Death Panels" is just a marketing ploy, rationing of healthcare has occurred, is occurring, and will always occur regardless of what others will have you believe. Lets get real people, and worry about real problems.
Exactly! I do wish that more people understood it tho.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-26-2010, 09:43 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,000 posts, read 44,804,275 times
Reputation: 13698
Quote:
Originally Posted by olecapt View Post
The saddest thing is that you can actually believe something so stupid simply because it fits your political preconceptions.
No, I believe it because a British heart surgeon said that is what actually happens.

What's sad is your inability to acknowledge the facts of what he said.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-26-2010, 10:01 PM
 
Location: NW Las Vegas - Lone Mountain
15,756 posts, read 38,197,261 times
Reputation: 2661
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
No, I believe it because a British heart surgeon said that is what actually happens.

What's sad is your inability to acknowledge the facts of what he said.
He said no such thing. You are still missing the underlying clause...

"For those cases where time is not an imperative and no large harm will result the schedule is..."

It is not difficult. You simply have your mind shut down to the obvious.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:15 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top