Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-19-2011, 12:48 PM
 
56,989 posts, read 35,168,788 times
Reputation: 18824

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by oz in SC View Post
I find it amusing that the Confederate flag being flown above the Confederate war memorial is wrong in the eyes of the NAACP....
Me personally, i don't get the anger over the Confederate flag. Doesn't bother me one bit. I wouldn't be caught dead flying it, nor would i set foot in a Confederate War memorial. I'd just simply ignore it as if it doesn't exist.

Like my own Mississippi bred father used to tell me on the subject of the Rebel Flag..."they sure are some proud losers!" (while laughing)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-19-2011, 12:51 PM
 
3,189 posts, read 4,979,261 times
Reputation: 1032
More worn out race baiting......nothing new for the NAACP.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2011, 12:53 PM
 
Location: deafened by howls of 'racism!!!'
52,708 posts, read 34,507,768 times
Reputation: 29276
Quote:
Originally Posted by ovcatto View Post
Of course shielding George couldn't have been an attempt by the NAACP to avoid criticism about using Washington as a backdrop? You know, no good deed goes unpunished. Just a thought.
getting rid of ol' george was a 'good deed' in your opinion?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2011, 12:53 PM
 
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,567 posts, read 21,858,721 times
Reputation: 2519
Quote:
Originally Posted by desertdetroiter View Post
Me personally, i don't get the anger over the Confederate flag. Doesn't bother me one bit. I wouldn't be caught dead flying it, nor would i set foot in a Confederate War memorial. I'd just simply ignore it as if it doesn't exist.

Like my own Mississippi bred father used to tell me on the subject of the Rebel Flag..."they sure are some proud losers!" (while laughing)
Funny thing is,most blacks here don't seem to give a crap either,it is those who live elsewhere....

One of the more interesting moments here in Beaufort was when the KKK came to town for a parade,this would have been 1987 or so.
They did their march up the street and were having a rally in the parking lot downtown.I lived at the marina nearby so went and stood and watched,along with a fairly good sized crowd(both black and white if it matters to anyone)

Well they give their speeches,and ask if anyone wants leaflets and the black lady next to me wondered aloud where they all planned to eat since almost every place in town had black cooks....she got a good laugh from the crowd.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2011, 12:57 PM
 
3,189 posts, read 4,979,261 times
Reputation: 1032
So our FIRST President owned slaves.

Have we NOT progressed past blaming him?

After all, it was a White President that went to war to end slavery. It was hundreds upon hundreds of thousands of White people who died for that cause.

It was also to a very large extent White people voted for our first Black President, without whom he couldn't possibly have won.

I thought that the election of our first Black President was supposed to have a healing effect?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2011, 01:00 PM
 
Location: Don't be a cry baby!
1,309 posts, read 1,361,752 times
Reputation: 617
"South Carolina NAACP Shields Audience from George Washington"

I'm not at all surprised, an organization such as the NAACP is known worldwide for racial discrimination and blatant bigotry.
They’re a “Catch 22” organization meaning if you call them on their actions they retort “RACIST”.
Any group that openly advocates the advancement of only one race (while squashing other races next to them) can’t possibly be anything less than racist.

I guess there next target is this link;

Racist - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary
Quote:
1: a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race

2: racial prejudice or discrimination
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2011, 01:04 PM
 
Location: Don't be a cry baby!
1,309 posts, read 1,361,752 times
Reputation: 617
Quote:
Originally Posted by KoobleKar View Post
I thought that the election of our first Black President was supposed to have a healing effect?
Thus the problem with giving and not earning.
"Those who expect always expect more."
"Those who earn always earn more."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2011, 01:08 PM
 
56,989 posts, read 35,168,788 times
Reputation: 18824
Quote:
Originally Posted by PCincorrect View Post
Thus the problem with giving and not earning.
"Those who expect always expect more."
"Those who earn always earn more."
So Obama put a gun to the voters heads and forced them to vote for him, huh?

He didn't "earn" it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2011, 01:18 PM
 
6,734 posts, read 9,335,929 times
Reputation: 1857
Update: South Carolina NAACP Shields Audience From…George Washington? | The Blaze

Quote:
The South Carolina NAACP has responded to a request for comment and said the only reason the statue of Washington was covered up was for aesthetic purposes. “We had created a backdrop behind the speakers,” the group spokesman told The Blaze late Tuesday afternoon, noting that someone in his

organization forgot to post an NAACP placard on the backdrop. According to the group, the statue of Washington has been covered each year for the annual rally. The spokesman said he was “at a loss for words” as to why covering President Washington would offend anyone, claiming it was “non-sensical” for people to believe it may have been politically motivated.
As a person who has done his share of photography, that was exactly my first thought when I saw the set up for the event.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2011, 01:19 PM
 
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,567 posts, read 21,858,721 times
Reputation: 2519
I am sure that is the reason.

Just one little thing,why couldn't they simply have moved the stage to one side or the other?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:30 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top