Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-21-2011, 06:45 AM
 
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,567 posts, read 21,868,498 times
Reputation: 2519

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by mistygrl092 View Post
All I'll say is if you need these large capacity magazines, you're not exactly a real good shot and should either give up your gun or take a class in shooting.
Is that why law enforcement carries high capacity magazines?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-21-2011, 06:46 AM
 
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,567 posts, read 21,868,498 times
Reputation: 2519
Quote:
Originally Posted by mistygrl092 View Post
And I stand by my statement. If you can't get the job done in 5 or 6 shots, you shouldn't be a gun owner. At that point, you're just a lousy shot.
Law enforcement?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-21-2011, 06:48 AM
 
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,567 posts, read 21,868,498 times
Reputation: 2519
Quote:
Originally Posted by mistygrl092 View Post
Well, a baseball bat taken to the brain stem works pretty well after the five or six shots.
So on top of the firearm,those defending themselves also will have to carry a baseball bat...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-21-2011, 06:49 AM
 
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,567 posts, read 21,868,498 times
Reputation: 2519
So....what is the purpose behind the proposed law?

What is hoped to be accomplished by passing the law?

How will it be accomplished?

What is the expected success rate of the law?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-21-2011, 07:12 AM
 
45,230 posts, read 26,437,203 times
Reputation: 24979
Quote:
Originally Posted by mistygrl092 View Post
All I'll say is if you need these large capacity magazines, you're not exactly a real good shot and should either give up your gun or take a class in shooting.
A class in shooting as is target practice much more enjoyable when you don't have to switch magazines as frequently.

Why is this a good bill?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-21-2011, 08:53 AM
 
Location: Visitation between Wal-Mart & Home Depot
8,309 posts, read 38,776,945 times
Reputation: 7185
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reg So View Post
I can't see how this bill (if made law) would accomplish anything, but this statement is not quite accurate. The bill allows for large capacity magazines that are already owned before enactment. So any large capacity magazines you already own are safe and you get to keep them.
After a good night's sleep I went through this thread again and read the bill again.

Everything I said yesterday (with the notable exception that this is a ridiculously unnecessary monument to ineffective legislature) was overreaction.

Existing magazines would be grandfathered under "clause ii" and it would really be impossible to register or track those in circulation.

McCarthy's life experience makes her believe that she's doing the right thing and she is essentially obligated to respond to something like the Gibbons tragedy, even if she knows this doesn't have a snowflake's chance of passing. How could she look at herself in the mirror otherwise?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-22-2011, 03:34 AM
 
2,851 posts, read 3,474,564 times
Reputation: 1200
Quote:
Originally Posted by mistygrl092 View Post
And I stand by my statement. If you can't get the job done in 5 or 6 shots, you shouldn't be a gun owner. At that point, you're just a lousy shot.
Average police shooting is 9 shots fired. Not a whole lot of leeway if your limited to 10 rounds.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimboburnsy View Post
After a good night's sleep I went through this thread again and read the bill again.

Everything I said yesterday (with the notable exception that this is a ridiculously unnecessary monument to ineffective legislature) was overreaction.

Existing magazines would be grandfathered under "clause ii" and it would really be impossible to register or track those in circulation.

McCarthy's life experience makes her believe that she's doing the right thing and she is essentially obligated to respond to something like the Gibbons tragedy, even if she knows this doesn't have a snowflake's chance of passing. How could she look at herself in the mirror otherwise?
Maybe push for current laws to be enforced. If the sheriff had notified NICS of death threats then Loughner wouldn't have been able to purchase his gun legally.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-22-2011, 12:08 PM
 
59,037 posts, read 27,298,344 times
Reputation: 14281
Quote:
Originally Posted by summers73 View Post
The Capitol Police should be dis-mantled. If the rest of us don't need
guns and such, the dem congressman don't need people with guns and such around them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-22-2011, 08:24 PM
 
30,063 posts, read 18,663,011 times
Reputation: 20880
Quote:
Originally Posted by summers73 View Post
I think it's cute that the bill's number is my favorite caliber.
Mine too!

I was just out exercising two ar-10s and an M1A this afternoon. The .308 is a damn fine round.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-22-2011, 10:10 PM
 
764 posts, read 597,193 times
Reputation: 660
Quote:
Originally Posted by outbacknv View Post
It's a knee jerk reaction by a group of well established anti-gunners attempting to use the emotions resulting from the shootings in Arizona to further their agenda. Every step they make toward restricting our rights brings them one step closer to their goal of completely neutering the Second Amendment.

It's akin to death by 1000 cuts.
A ban on high capacity magazines, and assault weapons was in place at once. It didn't lead to your second amendment rights being taken away...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:39 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top