Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-14-2011, 09:59 AM
 
7,871 posts, read 10,130,599 times
Reputation: 3241

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by thecoalman View Post
This is actually older story and they have been doing it for months. They aren't going after the poster but the sites. There's a provision in the DMCA that should protect site owners from this commonly called the "safe harbor" provision however there is loophole they are exploiting:





They are targeting sites that have not applied for this.
Well, ignorance of the law is no excuse.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-14-2011, 10:42 AM
 
Location: Houston, Tx
3,644 posts, read 6,305,063 times
Reputation: 1633
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strel View Post
Subject to what you've already contracted out of by agreeing to the TOS here.

maybe.
Darn, I've been out lawyered.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2011, 11:15 AM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,051,710 times
Reputation: 17864
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strel View Post
Well, ignorance of the law is no excuse.
It's not that its the law but you lose the blanket coverage safe harbor provides. They send a letter from a lawyer and hope the site capitulates and pays. If the site refused they would still have to sue the website and prove it's an infringement but the site couldn't claim safe harbor. Some have successfully fought them but it may be huge burden for a lot of smaller sites.

I think it was Getty images that was using similar tactic, they had an image for checkout basket that someone picked up and it somehow made it into a open source project. These sites were all using this copyrighted image unbeknown to them. They sent out a whole bunch of letters demanding payment with the threat of a lawsuit. To the best of my knowledge no one ever got sued but you can bet they made a fortune on those that paid.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:01 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top