Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-11-2011, 09:39 AM
 
2,514 posts, read 1,986,824 times
Reputation: 362

Advertisements


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x0k2PmF-o5Q

Why we are in this mess. We need to reinstate Glass Steagall. Those protections were put in place in light of the great depression.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-11-2011, 09:54 AM
 
Location: Georgia, on the Florida line, right above Tallahassee
10,471 posts, read 15,831,906 times
Reputation: 6438
I also support a repeal of Glass-Seagull.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1xb48Y6EdA


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kqy9h...eature=related
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-11-2011, 09:55 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,472,986 times
Reputation: 27720
Goldman Sachs, JPM and BoA will see to it that it never gets re-instated.
Wasn't even part of the big "financial reform" bill.
And they are still wheeling and dealing like nothing happened.
What did we get from it ? Why increased fees and disappearing "free" services.

The government is run by big business. Get used to it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-11-2011, 09:58 AM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,815,462 times
Reputation: 12341
The repeal of Glass-Steagall was an act that exemplifies the quote by Einstein: "Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result".

It was put in place for a reason. The reason ignored for ideological ends.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-11-2011, 12:52 PM
 
Location: North America
19,784 posts, read 15,109,663 times
Reputation: 8527
Gramm-Leach Bliley pretty much killed Glass Steagal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-11-2011, 01:52 PM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,480,794 times
Reputation: 9618
glass steagall had nothing to due with this

too big to fail...BEFORE 1999( the repeal)

they became 'too big to fail' before the repealing of G-S

1987 chemical bank merged in to jp morgan
1987 first fidelity into wells fargo
1988 fleet into norstar into bank of america
1990 bank of new england into BOA
1992 manufactorers hanover and trust into jp morgan
1996 chase manhattin into jp morgan
1996 Meridian Bancorp into wells fargo
1997 signet into first union into wells fargo
1998 travelrs into citi
1988 barclays into wells fargo


yes many happend after gs.. but the 'too big to fail' happend before Gs






housing bubble started BEFORE 1999

fannie/freddie et al...BEFORE 1999

Last edited by workingclasshero; 02-11-2011 at 02:01 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-11-2011, 02:37 PM
 
Location: Redondo Beach, CA
7,835 posts, read 8,438,931 times
Reputation: 8564
Quote:
Originally Posted by newonecoming2 View Post


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x0k2PmF-o5Q

Why we are in this mess. We need to reinstate Glass Steagall. Those protections were put in place in light of the great depression.
While I agree that the repeal of Glass-Steagall was a HUGE mistake, your link is extremely biased and gives an extremely slanted and "pat", partisan explanation as to who was behind its repeal, and who worked the longest and hardest to see that actually happen.

For a more balanced reporting, see:

frontline: the wall street fix: mr. weill goes to washington: the long demise of glass-steagall | PBS

. . .

Beginning in the 1960s, banks lobby Congress to allow them to enter the municipal bond market, and a lobbying subculture springs up around Glass-Steagall. Some lobbyists even brag about how the bill put their kids through college.

. . .


In 1991, the [George H.W.] Bush administration puts forward a repeal proposal, winning support of both the House and Senate Banking Committees, but the House again defeats the bill in a full vote. And in 1995, the House and Senate Banking Committees approve separate versions of legislation to get rid of Glass-Steagall, but conference negotiations on a compromise fall apart.

. . .

In May 1998, the [Republican controlled] House passes legislation by a vote of 214 to 213 that allows for the merging of banks, securities firms, and insurance companies into huge financial conglomerates. And in September, the Senate Banking Committee votes 16-2 to approve a compromise bank overhaul bill. Despite this new momentum, Congress is yet again unable to pass final legislation before the end of its session.

. . .

After 12 attempts in 25 years, Congress finally repeals Glass-Steagall, rewarding financial companies for more than 20 years and $300 million worth of lobbying efforts. Supporters hail the change as the long-overdue demise of a Depression-era relic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-11-2011, 02:39 PM
 
16,545 posts, read 13,451,300 times
Reputation: 4243
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jill61 View Post
While I agree that the repeal of Glass-Steagall was a HUGE mistake, your link is extremely biased and gives an extremely slanted and "pat", partisan explanation as to who was behind its repeal, and who worked the longest and hardest to see that actually happen.

For a more balanced reporting, see:

frontline: the wall street fix: mr. weill goes to washington: the long demise of glass-steagall | PBS

. . .

Beginning in the 1960s, banks lobby Congress to allow them to enter the municipal bond market, and a lobbying subculture springs up around Glass-Steagall. Some lobbyists even brag about how the bill put their kids through college.

. . .


In 1991, the [George H.W.] Bush administration puts forward a repeal proposal, winning support of both the House and Senate Banking Committees, but the House again defeats the bill in a full vote. And in 1995, the House and Senate Banking Committees approve separate versions of legislation to get rid of Glass-Steagall, but conference negotiations on a compromise fall apart.

. . .

In May 1998, the [Republican controlled] House passes legislation by a vote of 214 to 213 that allows for the merging of banks, securities firms, and insurance companies into huge financial conglomerates. And in September, the Senate Banking Committee votes 16-2 to approve a compromise bank overhaul bill. Despite this new momentum, Congress is yet again unable to pass final legislation before the end of its session.

. . .

After 12 attempts in 25 years, Congress finally repeals Glass-Steagall, rewarding financial companies for more than 20 years and $300 million worth of lobbying efforts. Supporters hail the change as the long-overdue demise of a Depression-era relic.
The Clinton Admin repealed it. That's all that matters. It was a horrible idea.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-11-2011, 02:41 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,472,986 times
Reputation: 27720
Why with the D vs R here ? Both parties aided and abetted the banksters.
Enough with the "my party is better than your party". Neither party is good anymore.
The repeal of Glass-Steagall was a great disservice to the American people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-11-2011, 02:45 PM
 
16,545 posts, read 13,451,300 times
Reputation: 4243
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
Why with the D vs R here ? Both parties aided and abetted the banksters.
Enough with the "my party is better than your party". Neither party is good anymore.
The repeal of Glass-Steagall was a great disservice to the American people.
Maybe because it was a D administration that repealed it? Maybe? I agree both are f'd up, but I mentioned Clinton because it was his admin that repealed it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:37 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top