Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-16-2011, 11:45 AM
 
45,582 posts, read 27,180,466 times
Reputation: 23891

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
You're asking for it. The masters surely do. Chaos is key. After all, as Einstein said...
"Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, and expecting a different result".

I see that with the desire to eliminate social programs that were put in place for a reason. A different (better) result is being expected.
I agree - which is why government pension policies ought to be changed.

We have a budget problem. WE HAVE NO MONEY. Yet government spends more and more and more - and they expect a different result in that the budget problem will go away. Total insanity.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-16-2011, 11:46 AM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,381,135 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRob4JC View Post
The intent of this country from its foundings is for Americans to take care of themselves - not for America to take care of its citizens.

Pensions for able bodied people is not what I call helping vulnerable citizens.
So, the meaning of "provide for the general welfare" is?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2011, 11:49 AM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,815,462 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRob4JC View Post
I agree - which is why government pension policies ought to be changed.

We have a budget problem. WE HAVE NO MONEY. Yet government spends more and more and more - and they expect a different result in that the budget problem will go away. Total insanity.
We don't seem to have a budget problem when it comes to taxes, defense spending and wars. So let us not shed crocodile tears about it.

Having said that, there were situations that necessitated social safety nets. Perhaps we're too stupid to remember or consider those now?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2011, 12:01 PM
 
30,063 posts, read 18,663,011 times
Reputation: 20880
Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
Let us hope the Tax Party will be asking to cut Social Security and Medicare, effective immediately because the nation cannot afford to wait any more.

And, I will sit back and watch the show.
The above statement is exactly why we are in the trouble we are in. Politicians have been fearful of doing what must be done, as they fear "retribution" from the voters. Given the desire to be re-elected, they have neglected thier duties and have chosen to throw more and more money at each problem, in the absence of the ability or will to make decisions.

And, of course, the "solution" for the democrats (witness the last four years of the democratic congress) is to spend to the point of insolvency, at which time there will be ZERO money for social programs.

So, Mr. Einstein, can you show us how the debt can be reduced and deficits eliminated in the absence of cuts (or marked increases in the age for eligbility) to medicare, social security, medicaid AND the military? Of course the answer is that the the deficits and debt CANNOT be addressed in the absence of cutting social programs and the military. Liberals, however, prefer to stick thier heads in the sand and wait for insolvency to happen. Quite a "plan".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2011, 12:13 PM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,479 posts, read 59,778,277 times
Reputation: 24863
Please remember Social Security was implemented after the retirement savings of millions of Americans properly taking care of themselves were robbed by the bank collapses the led to the Great Depression. The problem with all the little people behaving correctly by saving for themselves is that money has historically been stolen by speculators every 20 years or so. This happened again a few years ago when small investor 401k and other retirement accounts were wiped out by a “market correction”. The market leaders that sold out early, creating the collapse, kept their ill gotten gains.

Until the private sector wage collapses of the last decade, government employees, particularly town, city and state, were rarely paid more than 70% of the private sector equivalents. These differences were even larger for managerial positions. No government bureaucrat I ever heard of was paid even a fraction of upper management in the private sector. In order to get qualified people generous pensions were offered as an effective delayed wages. The fact that these plans were never properly funded, or the funds were looted in speculative collapses, are not the result of the employees actions. They were caused by irresponsible tax cutting Conservatives and financial speculators.

The pension deals were made by both politicians and employees. Now the politicians want to change the deal “Because we are out of money”. That is a blatant lie as we have unlimited money for our Petroleum Wars and corporate bailouts. The war profiteers do not want to have THEIR entitlements cut but they are willing to eliminate millions of pensions to pay for their Wars.

New England Apple farmers have know for centuries that when a barrel of apples are rotting look to the top for the cause. Our system is rotting because of unscrupulous thieves at the top of both our financial and governmental organizations.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2011, 12:17 PM
 
76 posts, read 45,190 times
Reputation: 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by GregW View Post
Please remember Social Security was implemented after the retirement savings of millions of Americans properly taking care of themselves were robbed by the bank collapses the led to the Great Depression. The problem with all the little people behaving correctly by saving for themselves is that money has historically been stolen by speculators every 20 years or so. This happened again a few years ago when small investor 401k and other retirement accounts were wiped out by a “market correctionâ€. The market leaders that sold out early, creating the collapse, kept their ill gotten gains.

Until the private sector wage collapses of the last decade, government employees, particularly town, city and state, were rarely paid more than 70% of the private sector equivalents. These differences were even larger for managerial positions. No government bureaucrat I ever heard of was paid even a fraction of upper management in the private sector. In order to get qualified people generous pensions were offered as an effective delayed wages. The fact that these plans were never properly funded, or the funds were looted in speculative collapses, are not the result of the employees actions. They were caused by irresponsible tax cutting Conservatives and financial speculators.

The pension deals were made by both politicians and employees. Now the politicians want to change the deal “Because we are out of moneyâ€. That is a blatant lie as we have unlimited money for our Petroleum Wars and corporate bailouts. The war profiteers do not want to have THEIR entitlements cut but they are willing to eliminate millions of pensions to pay for their Wars.

New England Apple farmers have know for centuries that when a barrel of apples are rotting look to the top for the cause. Our system is rotting because of unscrupulous thieves at the top of both our financial and governmental organizations.
Its near impossible to form an argument. Maybe if Government acted more responsibly in other areas the areas that actually do help people would not be scapegoated.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2011, 12:20 PM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,381,135 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by Highhat View Post
Its near impossible to form an argument. Maybe if Government acted more responsibly in other areas the areas that actually do help people would not be scapegoated.
Unfortunately there's apparently no well funded lobby with the average American's interests as its focus.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2011, 12:21 PM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,479 posts, read 59,778,277 times
Reputation: 24863
The government does help people. The problem is the help goes to the people that least need help.

Some of these people would best be helped by some jail time. What the do may be legal but it is still grand theft.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2011, 12:23 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,815,462 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
The above statement is exactly why we are in the trouble we are in. Politicians have been fearful of doing what must be done, as they fear "retribution" from the voters. Given the desire to be re-elected, they have neglected thier duties and have chosen to throw more and more money at each problem, in the absence of the ability or will to make decisions.
Politicians? The "above statement" was about tea partiers. I hope there is a difference?

Quote:
And, of course, the "solution" for the democrats (witness the last four years of the democratic congress) is to spend to the point of insolvency, at which time there will be ZERO money for social programs.
The federal government collected less in taxes in 2009 than it had done in 2001 (in constant 2009). Could this fact be present in the picture you present when speaking of deficits and debt? No?

Quote:
So, Mr. Einstein, can you show us how the debt can be reduced and deficits eliminated in the absence of cuts (or marked increases in the age for eligbility) to medicare, social security, medicaid AND the military? Of course the answer is that the the deficits and debt CANNOT be addressed in the absence of cutting social programs and the military. Liberals, however, prefer to stick thier heads in the sand and wait for insolvency to happen. Quite a "plan".
And having a President who has spoken along the lines hasn't changed your mind. I've spoken along the lines of necessary cuts hasn't changed your mind. To make it worse, you were one of those who had lost his mind on the notion of reduction in Medicare expenses via Health Care Reform.

There is NOTHING that can make you "get it".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2011, 12:26 PM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,479 posts, read 59,778,277 times
Reputation: 24863
EG - "Getting it" would require the ability to think rationally. That skill is not apparent.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:15 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top