Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-17-2011, 07:30 AM
 
58,973 posts, read 27,267,735 times
Reputation: 14265

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oerdin View Post
SSI has over $2.5 trillion in assets and it is perfectly fine at least until 2049 without a single change at all. Simply removing the SSI cap (where the rich only pay SSI taxes on the first $109,000 made per year) will make SSI solvient until 2090. The people saying we have to cut the elderly loose and let them die in the streets are lying.

And the only ones saying that are the left whose only missio is to demonize anything with an R next to their name.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-17-2011, 07:33 AM
 
58,973 posts, read 27,267,735 times
Reputation: 14265
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
Correct. And until then SS has to borrow to make their monthly payments.
And what is worse is that payroll taxes are lower this year which is even less going to SS by taxpayers.

And it ends up being a big circular game between the Fed, the Treasury and all the agencies.
I believe I read that last month SS started that borrowing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2011, 07:38 AM
 
1,324 posts, read 1,197,923 times
Reputation: 445
I voted to stop spending , like most others.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2011, 07:38 AM
 
Location: deafened by howls of 'racism!!!'
52,708 posts, read 34,525,339 times
Reputation: 29284
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oerdin View Post
SSI has over $2.5 trillion in assets and it is perfectly fine at least until 2049 without a single change at all. Simply removing the SSI cap (where the rich only pay SSI taxes on the first $109,000 made per year) will make SSI solvient until 2090. The people saying we have to cut the elderly loose and let them die in the streets are lying.
can you give us a link to the people saying that?

because i think it should have been in the news by now..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2011, 07:39 AM
 
58,973 posts, read 27,267,735 times
Reputation: 14265
Quote:
Originally Posted by padcrasher View Post
Well it's obvious your a victim of right wing propaganda.

But let me ask you this....Since your money is now going into your private account. How are current retirees going to get their money? Because they rely almost 95% on what you pay into SS to fund their retirement now.

Don't tell me.......................You want to borrow Trillions from China to fund your scheme?
This problem has been going on for years. preident Bush tried to address the SS problem but, the dem controlled Congress would not even sit down and discuss.

The D's had control of the House for 4 years. Total control of Congress and the WH for 2 years. Show us what they have done to address the problems. Anything.

I have read on here all the left whinning about the repubs addressing the issues.

To all you D's, what is your solurion?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2011, 07:47 AM
 
58,973 posts, read 27,267,735 times
Reputation: 14265
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winter_Sucks View Post
Entitlements have to be cut because we gave Bill Gates a nice fat tax cut.
That's the answer. What Bill Gates saved in taxes is enouh to pay the total US debt. And we wonder why we are in the situation we now have with this type of thinking in charge.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2011, 07:49 AM
 
58,973 posts, read 27,267,735 times
Reputation: 14265
Quote:
Originally Posted by Casper in Dallas View Post
All I can say is that the GOP is trying their best to lose the House back to the Dems as soon as possible. Cut Medicare or SS and watch your political career go down in flames. But hey, don't let reality get in the way, go for it.
Casper
So, you are saying politicians should NOT do anything that might jeopardize their chance of re-election. They shouldn't try to fix a massive financial problem at the cost or re-election?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2011, 07:55 AM
 
14,247 posts, read 17,914,646 times
Reputation: 13807
Why should SS be cut? The money is there ... $2.5 trillion. All Congress has to do is honor their IOUs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2011, 07:58 AM
 
3,153 posts, read 3,592,486 times
Reputation: 1080
The GOP got your vote now they will get your Medicare benefits!

yes..and the boogie man will crawl into bed with you...boo
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2011, 08:03 AM
 
30,058 posts, read 18,652,475 times
Reputation: 20860
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winter_Sucks View Post
Entitlements have to be cut because we gave Bill Gates a nice fat tax cut.
If we taxed "the wealthy" at a 100% rate (everyone making over $250,000), thus instituting slavery for this group, we would still have a deficit.

Try again. This time, think about cutting entitlements. Keep in mind that Bill Gates "received" nothing. He, like the rest of us, still pay. It is insane to complain that there is not enough tax revenue for entitlements when the government has exercised gross dereliction of duty with regard to the fiancial management of the nation. If taxes were raised, they would simply find more entitlements to spend on (see Obamacare) and create a bigger problem. Every beggar wants more and more- it is human nature. I do not deride the poor for trying to get what they can, but the bucket is empty now and the "bread and circuses" is coming to an end. Time to pull one's self up by the bootstraps and take some personal responsibility for one's existence. I never needed the federal nana to bounce me on thier knee and spoon feed me. Having created a large cohort of fiscal infants by the social programs, we have simply created a bigger problem.

We have a spending problem, not a revenue problem.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:44 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top