Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-11-2012, 10:31 AM
 
3,064 posts, read 2,638,264 times
Reputation: 968

Advertisements

"Iowa Republicans are taking aim at the state's top law school for denying a faculty position to a conservative law professor, who an assistant dean once said embraces politics the rest of the faculty "despises."
"Teresa Wagner, who works as an associate director of writing at the University of Iowa College of Law, is suing former dean Carolyn Jones for employment discrimination, claiming she was not hired for a professor position because Jones and other law faculty disapproved of her conservative views and activism."
"To hold a law faculty position at the publicly funded university is viewed as a
"sacred cow," Wagner said in an interview, and "Republicans need not apply."

Read more: Iowa Republicans blast law school over refusal to hire conservative professor as faculty | Fox News

Not a huge fan of lawsuits, but this one seems like a battle worth fighting. Everyone knows our Universities have been taken over by the Left and Conservatives are the new minority and the only one not being protected. Time to take 'em on and win back a balanced educational system.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-11-2012, 10:58 AM
 
Location: the Beaver State
6,464 posts, read 13,437,760 times
Reputation: 3581
Who got hired in the position instead? How did the two of them interview? Was it a really hard decision? Or was the one who got hired clearly the better candidate during the interview?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2012, 11:23 AM
 
13,684 posts, read 9,006,517 times
Reputation: 10405
http://www.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/11/12/102588P.pdf

Here, for those interested, is the opinion by the Eighth Circuit remanding the case.

Go at it, Legal Eagles.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2012, 11:39 AM
 
3,064 posts, read 2,638,264 times
Reputation: 968
Quote:
Originally Posted by hamellr View Post
Who got hired in the position instead? How did the two of them interview? Was it a really hard decision? Or was the one who got hired clearly the better candidate during the interview?
Guess we'll find out as the court case goes forward. But for those of you who may doubt the BIAS against Conservatives in our public universities, take a look at this from an expert on BIAS:

"SAN ANTONIO — Some of the world’s pre-eminent experts on bias discovered an unexpected form of it at their annual meeting."

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/08/science/08tier.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2012, 11:42 AM
 
5,391 posts, read 7,228,906 times
Reputation: 2857
Sure sounds like she has a point, it seems the faculty didn't want an "icky" conservative in their midst and made up the excuse about her being weak in analysis.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2012, 11:59 AM
 
78,385 posts, read 60,566,039 times
Reputation: 49653
Not really shocking that the decision makers are going to make it like their own little clubhouse.

Just like people complain about the old boys club....there are definitely bastions of exclusivity besides those that are *comfortable* to point out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2012, 12:05 PM
 
Location: Eastern NC
20,868 posts, read 23,547,540 times
Reputation: 18814
And if it was the other way around, conservatives would be appluading the decision.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2012, 12:27 PM
 
Location: New London County, CT
8,949 posts, read 12,134,556 times
Reputation: 5145
Conservatives aren't a protected class. It is, in fact, legal to discriminate against them. Just like it is legal to discriminate against gays. Maybe both problems should be fixed?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2012, 12:47 PM
 
Location: Tyler, TX
23,864 posts, read 24,105,148 times
Reputation: 15135
Quote:
Originally Posted by mlassoff View Post
Conservatives aren't a protected class. It is, in fact, legal to discriminate against them.
Not according to the Supreme Court.

‘[P]olitical belief and association constitute the core of those activities protected by the First Amendment.’” Rutan v. Republican Party of Ill., 497 U.S. 62, 69 (1990) (quoting Elrod v. Burns, 427 U.S. 347, 356 (1976)). In Rutan, the United States Supreme Court extended Branti v. Finkel, 445 U.S. 507 (1980) and Elrod v. Burns, 427 U.S. 347 (1976) and held that the First Amendment prohibits a state from basing hiring decisions on political beliefs or associations with limited exceptions for policymaking and confidential positions.

But wait, there's more...

Academic freedom is a “special concern of the First Amendment.” Keyishian v. Bd. of Regents of Univ. of N.Y., 385 U.S. 589, 603 (1967). “No more direct assault on academic freedom can be imagined than for the school authorities to [refuse to hire] a teacher because of his or her philosophical, political, or ideological beliefs.” Bd. of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 169, 187-88 (1972) (Douglas, J., dissenting).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2012, 12:59 PM
 
Location: Home, Home on the Front Range
25,826 posts, read 20,698,449 times
Reputation: 14818
Quote:
Originally Posted by trlhiker View Post
And if it was the other way around, conservatives would be appluading the decision.
Well, yeah.

Wasn't that long ago they were condemning Derrick Bell, and by extension the president, for fighting for more inclusiveness at Harvard back in the day.
But of course that was different.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:02 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top