Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-07-2011, 10:02 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
88,971 posts, read 44,780,079 times
Reputation: 13680

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
Once again, you accused me of something, I asked you to prove it, and you've failed. You seem unable to own up to the fact that you attacked me and owe me an apology for the unwarranted attack.
Attacked you of what? Being a shill for the union official fat cats so they can keep their $50-68 million per year in health insurance overcharges?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-07-2011, 10:08 AM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,861,612 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Attacked you of what? Being a shill for the union official fat cats so they can keep their $50-68 million per year in health insurance overcharges?
More attacks, without foundation.

Clearly, you've never read my posts. It's laughable, really.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2011, 10:09 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
88,971 posts, read 44,780,079 times
Reputation: 13680
Quote:
Originally Posted by HistorianDude View Post
Well now... that was frantic hail Mary pass into oblivious bloviationville.
Nope. This has been a KNOWN issue since 2000 (see report linked below). Dem Governor Doyle did nothing about it, and let the union official fat cats overcharge WI taxpayers by a minimum of $400 million* over his eight year administration.

http://www.wpri.org/Reports/Volume13/Vol13no8.pdf

As a WI taxpayer, I knew about all of this. Many of you didn't, but shot your mouths off anyway.

*The $400 million minimum is the correct minimum amount ($50 million x 8 years). My previous post had an error on the total cost of the union overcharges to the WI taxpayers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2011, 10:11 AM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,070,698 times
Reputation: 3954
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Nope. This has been a KNOWN issue since 2000 (see report linked below).
Ignoring that you generally would not recognize an "issue" if it bit you on the face... this "issue" has apparently nothing to do with the thread or the arguments being made within it.

PS... got anything fresher than more than a decade ago?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2011, 10:12 AM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,861,612 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Nope. This has been a KNOWN issue since 2000 (see report linked below). Dem Governor Doyle did nothing about it, and let the union official fat cats overcharge WI taxpayers by a minimum of $400 million over his eight year administration.

http://www.wpri.org/Reports/Volume13/Vol13no8.pdf

As a WI taxpayer, I knew about all of this. Many of you didn't, but shot your mouths off anyway.
Actually, you've been shooting off your own mouth, accusing people of things they haven't done, asserting people have stated things they haven't said.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2011, 10:37 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
88,971 posts, read 44,780,079 times
Reputation: 13680
Quote:
Originally Posted by HistorianDude View Post
Ignoring that you generally would not recognize an "issue" if it bit you on the face... this "issue" has apparently nothing to do with the thread or the arguments being made within it.
It has everything to do with the thread topic. The WI Dems and unions plotted to stall the progress of the WI budget repair bill so that they could ink contract deals before the new limits took effect. They tried to preserve the union's ability to keep overcharging the WI taxpayers.

Quote:
PS... got anything fresher than more than a decade ago?
Yes. The WPRI's 2005 estimate is $100 million per year in union health insurance company overcharges.

Be sure to read the Executive Summary:
http://www.wpri.org/Reports/Volume18/Vol18no1.pdf

In the spirit of concern and cooperation, Walker uses a lower $68 million per year figure for the overcharges to make sure teachers would be obtaining similar coverage in the WI State insurance plan.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2011, 10:40 AM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,070,698 times
Reputation: 3954
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
It has everything to do with the thread topic.
No... it doesn't actually.

But you just keep thinking that if it makes you feel better.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2011, 10:51 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
88,971 posts, read 44,780,079 times
Reputation: 13680
Quote:
Originally Posted by HistorianDude View Post
No... it doesn't actually.
Yes, it does. Read the thread title: Government e-mails reveal Dems/unions possibly colluded in plot to stall budget repair bill in WI

The WI Dems and unions colluded to stall the progress of the WI budget repair bill so that they could ink contract deals before the new limits took effect. They tried to preserve the union's ability to keep overcharging the WI taxpayers $100 million* per year.


* WPRI's figure:
http://www.wpri.org/Reports/Volume18/Vol18no1.pdf
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2011, 10:53 AM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,070,698 times
Reputation: 3954
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Yes, it does. Read the thread title: Government e-mails reveal Dems/unions possibly colluded in plot to stall budget repair bill in WI
I've been involved in this thread since the beginning.

Please, stop trying to change the subject.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2011, 11:00 AM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,861,612 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Yes, it does. Read the thread title: Government e-mails reveal Dems/unions possibly colluded in plot to stall budget repair bill in WI

The WI Dems and unions colluded to stall the progress of the WI budget repair bill so that they could ink contract deals before the new limits took effect. They tried to preserve the union's ability to keep overcharging the WI taxpayers $100 million* per year.


* WPRI's figure:
http://www.wpri.org/Reports/Volume18/Vol18no1.pdf
No evidence of collusion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top