Public Employee Unions...The Big Lie about them (brainwash, dollars, school)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
In some Unions you can be Management and still pay your dues. This is a safety measure that in case you screw up (and most do) you can return back to the rank and file.
public employees' unions don't get a single red cent from taxpayers.
Untrue, I've come across one example. Union controlled insurance companies providing the health insurance the same union is demanding in their contract.
Also, in both states, teachers unions run their own health insurance companies — the Michigan Education Special Services Association was created in 1960 and the Wisconsin Education Association Trust in 1970. An estimated 64 percent of Wisconsin school districts buy WEA Trust coverage, and about 80 percent of Michigan districts get the insurance with a union label. Both unions relentlessly pressure local school boards to buy insurance from their subsidiaries — MESSA actually brags about how many districts suffered teacher strikes over whether to purchase its costly coverage (such strikes are now illegal in Michigan).
That's a conflict of interest and taxpayer funds being directly spent on the union when the same union that is demanding a product is also the selling it, wouldn't you agree?
FYI the average family plan in Wisconsin districts comes out to $20K per year.
School boards didn’t willingly roll over as school employees fought for respect and the compensation packages they deserved, however. Working together, tough MEA UniServ negotiators and local association leaders developed winning bargaining strategies and stood firm. School employees hit the picket line if needed. The tide slowly turned. School employees were winning the respect of school boards and the public.
Collective bargaining, tough negotiators and the willingness of school employees to go out on strike for MESSA benefits in the 1970s led to rapid growth at MESSA, growth which continues today.
It doesn't matter that the actual union is not financed by taxpayers. The problem is that the Public Union has negotiated wages and benefits and working hours far better than those of the private sector workers whose taxes pay that compensation.
Why has this happened? Because the very idea of public unions is flawed. Unions arose so that workers could negotiate with business owners for a share of the business revenues. The total was limited by what the business brought in, minus expenses, and the business owner and union fought over the leftovers for an equitable distribution between capitalist/entrepreneur and worker (this has been skewed a bit with the Corporation and the Robber-Baron CEO, but that's the idea).
In a Public Union, however, the Government has taxing authority, and both the Public Union and those they are negotiating against, Government Administrators, are ON THE SAME SIDE. Consequently, the Government Officials are more than happy to award generous wages, benefits, working hours and perks, because their own salaries and benefits will reflect how well lower-level government workers are compensated. NOBODY in the negotiation represent the taxpayer--who must pay the bill, no matter how generous, and no matter how many local taxpayers are forced out of their paid-for homes by obscene property taxes.
There should never have been public unions; they are not needed and should be illlegal, as they are in specific cases. Now that the inevitable results have played out in the real world, resulting in debts for the taxpayer that simply exceed what they are able to pay and retain the homes they paid for already, we must deal with the problem.
Public workers should NOT be compensated at levels far beyond the private sector workers who pay their salaries. Those who would argue that public workers pay taxes too, forget that they are being given so much excess money that they still are far ahead of the game after accounting for the taxes.
What excess money to private workers get to pay the bankrupting taxes caused by over-generous compensation of those who often work only 20 or 25 years to get full retirement?
Membership was/is not forced for the Teacher's Union in California. I know this to be fact! How about your experience? Or are you going by hearsay? Did you read it in an email forward? See it on the interwebs? Or do you know from real life experience?
I'm going by experience. I have been in a union twice in my life.
Care to cite your b.s.?
No, you are a liar. I live in California and belong to a "union." I DO NOT have too. I can opt out, if I chose. Therefore, you BS is just that; BS. You are wrond.
No, you are a liar. I live in California and belong to a "union." I DO NOT have too. I can opt out, if I chose. Therefore, you BS is just that; BS. You are wrond.
Do you know how many people have chosen to opt out?
I can't and won't speak for others. But as you can see/read, some people in this thread have no problem doing so. Because all Unions across all the states are the same, right?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.