Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-07-2011, 02:55 PM
 
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,567 posts, read 21,870,208 times
Reputation: 2519

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Smash255 View Post
Its already illegal, and again this is NOT about stopping voter fraud, this is about stopping college kids from voting on campus because of not liking the way they vote.
You keep saying that,but it doesn't stop them voting at all,they simply can absentee vote.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-07-2011, 02:56 PM
 
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,567 posts, read 21,870,208 times
Reputation: 2519
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smash255 View Post
No, actually the argument is college students should be allowed to vote where they go to school and live most of the year. They shouldn't be forced to vote absentee because others do not like the way college students vote.
But they are not residents of that state right?
That isn't their home state.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2011, 02:57 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,818,277 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by oz in SC View Post
No-one has yet answered WHY it is so difficult for college students to absentee vote....but I have my suspicions it may indeed be laziness.
Two problems:
1- Would it be your first choice, over voting in person?
2- Would you prefer to vote in an election that affects you directly, or somewhere you don't even live but only visit occasionally?

Quote:
Originally Posted by oz in SC View Post
But they are not residents of that state right?
That isn't their home state.
That is where they live, eat, party and study. It is where they contribute the most to the economy. It is where the policies affect them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2011, 02:57 PM
 
Location: Long Island (chief in S Farmingdale)
22,190 posts, read 19,462,661 times
Reputation: 5305
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moth View Post
Oh I see- "They still could..."


So this evil move by the GOP could easily be twarted were it not for the laziness and apathy of students?

Not that I am a registered Republican, but thank you for absolving them of these idiotic accusations.

These college students need only get of thier lazy butts and go through the proper procedures to vote, no? I mean, Smash255, a great many blacks before 1965 went through hell to excercise the right to vote. Not to mention women before the early 20th century.

And you, Smash255, come on here and yowl about students not being catered to and pampered.

You really should be ashamed of yourself.


Well its more than just that. Again they should be allowed to vote where they actually attend school and live for most of the year. They shouldn't be forced to vote absentee because some people do not like the way college students vote.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2011, 02:58 PM
 
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,567 posts, read 21,870,208 times
Reputation: 2519
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
I'm sorry but you are wrong..

Military Legal Residence and Home of Record

"Home of Record" is used to determine travel entitlements when one separates from the military. It has nothing to do with voting or paying taxes, registering vehicles, nor any of the other priviledges of state residency.

"Legal Residency," or "domicile", on the other hand refers to the place where a military member intends to return to and live after discharge or retirement, and which they consider their "permanent home." Legal residency determines what local (state) tax laws a military member is subject to, and in which local (city, county, state) elections they may vote in.

If a military personnel from Florida is stationed in Texas.. they vote in Florida..

Under the law, "legal residence" is the place that the military member intends to live after they separate or retire from the military. It's the place that they consider their "permament home."

Again, why do you think college students should be treated any different than those in the military? Is college these childrens "permanent home"?
Interesting,it DOES seem some people do want special privileges for college students...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2011, 02:59 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,108,083 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smash255 View Post
Stopping college kids from voting on campus because of not liking their views, ideology or how they vote. Stopping those from be able to vote on campus because you don't like how they vote is absolutely ridiculous. THAT is what this is about.
Thats complete bull crap..
I may not like the fact that you voted for Obama, but a vote for Obama in the state of PA, vs one in OH is a vote for Obama.. the fact that you dont want students to vote in the state they legally reside like the rest of america amounts to what some might call a baby tantrum.

Be damned with the process
Be damned with the laws
You want it your way and you dont care about the fact that these policies if put in place are the very same policies that those in the military follow.. waaa.. you want people to follow rules and laws, ooh except those special people.. you know.. Democratic voters..

Again, why do you think students should be afforded special exemptions to the rules everyone else needs to follow?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2011, 03:01 PM
 
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,567 posts, read 21,870,208 times
Reputation: 2519
Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
The striking down was related to cost of ID cards, not on ID itself. As in "poll tax". Or, do you also support the idea that people should pay for ID cards to be eligible to vote?
I was simply posting the law is Constitutional according to the Supreme Court of GA.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2011, 03:01 PM
 
Location: Long Island (chief in S Farmingdale)
22,190 posts, read 19,462,661 times
Reputation: 5305
Quote:
Originally Posted by oz in SC View Post
You keep saying that,but it doesn't stop them voting at all,they simply can absentee vote.
Voting absentee reduces the chances a college student will vote, but that is part of another argument.

Fact of the matter is college students should be allowed to vote in the area they are attending school and live most of the year. They should not have that ability to vote where they attend school taken away from them because of those who do not like their ideology or how they vote.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2011, 03:02 PM
 
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,567 posts, read 21,870,208 times
Reputation: 2519
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smash255 View Post
More can be done to stop voter fraud without infringing on the rights of college students being able to vote. You can do more to stop voter fraud without forcing college kids to vote absentee and not allowing them to vote where they attend school. Again this is NOT about voter fraud. This is about stopping college kids from voting on campus because you don't like how they vote.


THIS IS WHAT THIS ABOUT



Stopping college kids from voting on campus because of not liking their views, ideology or how they vote. Stopping those from be able to vote on campus because you don't like how they vote is absolutely ridiculous. THAT is what this is about.
The college students can still vote,they simply have to vote in their own state.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2011, 03:04 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,818,277 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by oz in SC View Post
I was simply posting the law is Constitutional according to the Supreme Court of GA.
ID would of course be constitutional. I thought, I was clear about the law being struck down on unconstitutional grounds of "poll tax".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:49 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top