Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Who Was Better?
FDR 67 54.47%
Ronald Reagan 56 45.53%
Voters: 123. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-15-2011, 06:48 AM
 
Location: Vermont
11,759 posts, read 14,650,345 times
Reputation: 18528

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by knowledgeiskey View Post
Who was the better president? FDR is the father of liberalism while Ronald Reagan is regarded as the greatest Republican president.
This quote pretty much says it all.

Conservatives do think that Reagan was the greatest Republican president, and many think he was the greatest president ever.

In other words, they consider a president who supported the racist policies of Bob Jones University and the racist regime in South Africa to be greater than Abraham Lincoln, who did nothing except preserve the Union and end slavery.

Makes you think about where the values of conservatives lie, doesn't it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-15-2011, 07:08 AM
 
Location: Vermont
11,759 posts, read 14,650,345 times
Reputation: 18528
Quote:
Originally Posted by wade52 View Post
Note how the rate fell through the floor as a result of the federal government launching a huge spending program on the military.
Are you having trouble reading the table?

It started dropping the year after FDR took office, and except for two years it kept dropping every year even before the war.

But I suppose FDR had nothing to do with that, huh?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-15-2011, 10:48 AM
 
Location: Orange County, CA
3,727 posts, read 6,222,517 times
Reputation: 4257
Quote:
Originally Posted by jackmccullough View Post
It started dropping the year after FDR took office, and except for two years it kept dropping every year even before the war.
Not quite. The unemployment rate went up sharply in 1938, and in 1939 it was higher than it had been in 1936. WW II started in September, and only when our production increased in order to supply our allies did the jobless rate decline.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-15-2011, 10:54 AM
 
Location: USA - midwest
5,944 posts, read 5,582,900 times
Reputation: 2606
Smile Relax and take a deep breath

Quote:
Originally Posted by jackmccullough View Post
Are you having trouble reading the table?
We're on the same side of this argument. See my post #91.

Quote:
It started dropping the year after FDR took office, and except for two years it kept dropping every year even before the war.

But I suppose FDR had nothing to do with that, huh?
Feel free to point out anywhere I mentioned that he didn't.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-15-2011, 11:02 AM
 
1,461 posts, read 1,528,815 times
Reputation: 790
Quote:
Originally Posted by dcsldcd View Post
Clearly Ronald Reagan. Liberalism is what is destroying this country and society.
Wrong. At a time when the rest of the world turned to: facism (Italy, Germany, most of East Europe) the Soviet Union was communist, France was disfunctional politically, and Great Britian was thrust from one crisis to another and Argentina sunk from a world power to a disfunctional nation, FDR kept this nation stable. He had the forsight to see the coming crisis in Europe and Asia. Had the GOP run the place, the pro Nazi conservative America First movement would have taken over. During the previous GOP administrations, the nation was first plunged under Harding and Coolidge into a great farming depression, followed by a total depression under Hoover. The KKK ran several states and took a prominent national role. It would have been a frightful nation and world without FDR. Like it or not, FDR saved this nation with a moderate course between two extremes.

"If by a "Liberal" they mean someone who looks ahead and not behind, someone who welcomes new ideas without rigid reactions, someone who cares about the welfare of the people — their health, their housing, their schools, their jobs, their civil rights, and their civil liberties — someone who believes we can break through the stalemate and suspicions that grip us in our policies abroad, if that is what they mean by a "Liberal," then I'm proud to say I'm a "Liberal." JFK 9/14/1960

Last edited by newhandle; 03-15-2011 at 11:47 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-15-2011, 11:23 AM
 
Location: Texas
37,949 posts, read 17,859,151 times
Reputation: 10371
Quote:
Originally Posted by jackmccullough View Post
This quote pretty much says it all.

Conservatives do think that Reagan was the greatest Republican president, and many think he was the greatest president ever.

In other words, they consider a president who supported the racist policies of Bob Jones University and the racist regime in South Africa to be greater than Abraham Lincoln, who did nothing except preserve the Union and end slavery.

Makes you think about where the values of conservatives lie, doesn't it?
Lincolns goal had nothing to do with ending slavery. A couple times in his speeches he said his goal had nothing to do with slavery but instead preserving the Union. But don't take Lincolns word for it.

makes you wonder where the education of liberals lie, doesn't it?

Last edited by Loveshiscountry; 03-15-2011 at 12:09 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-15-2011, 11:44 AM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,813,019 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackShoe View Post
Not quite. The unemployment rate went up sharply in 1938, and in 1939 it was higher than it had been in 1936.
A result of attempts to balance the budget while recovery was still going.

Quote:
WW II started in September, and only when our production increased in order to supply our allies did the jobless rate decline.
Massive government spending went with it, about 50% of the GDP for a few years in the 1940s.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-15-2011, 12:08 PM
 
Location: Texas
37,949 posts, read 17,859,151 times
Reputation: 10371
Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
A result of attempts to balance the budget while recovery was still going.

Massive government spending went with it, about 50% of the GDP for a few years in the 1940s.
Unemployment going up had little to do with trying to balance the budget. Unemployment went up as a result of FDR stealing money from the private sector. The taxes and burdens imposed inhibited companies from hiring.
FDR set wages, AGAIN. Because of this companies had to make due with less workers. Do the math. If you budgeted for $100 and are forced to pay out $5 you get 20 workers. Lower the wage scale to $4 and you get 25 workers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-15-2011, 12:31 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,813,019 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loveshiscountry View Post
Unemployment going up had little to do with trying to balance the budget. Unemployment went up as a result of FDR stealing money from the private sector. The taxes and burdens imposed inhibited companies from hiring.
You're forgetting cuts in federal spending. Did that happen as well?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Loveshiscountry View Post
Lincolns goal had nothing to do with ending slavery. A couple times in his speeches he said his goal had nothing to do with slavery but instead preserving the Union.
Lincoln didn’t get to set his goals, considering that just his election had many get their undies twisted in a knot.

Last edited by EinsteinsGhost; 03-15-2011 at 12:48 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-15-2011, 12:42 PM
 
Location: Vermont
11,759 posts, read 14,650,345 times
Reputation: 18528
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loveshiscountry View Post
Lincolns goal had nothing to do with ending slavery. A couple times in his speeches he said his goal had nothing to do with slavery but instead preserving the Union. But don't take Lincolns word for it.

makes you wonder where the education of liberals lie, doesn't it?
Now go back and show me where I said anything about Lincoln's goals.

I'll wait.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:18 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top