Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-14-2011, 10:35 AM
 
Location: You Ta Zhou
866 posts, read 1,560,189 times
Reputation: 401

Advertisements

It seems that a lot of people think that Japan was not very successful in stopping more devastation from happening. So imagine this scenario...

A huge earthquake occurs off the coast of Florida and a tsunami with 35-foot-high waves comes rushing towards Jacksonville, the metro area closest in population size to Sendai. In about half an hour, waves are wiping out towns along the Florida/Georgia/South Carolina coast.

Who honestly thinks that there would be fewer deaths in this disaster as compared to the Sendai earthquake? I'm guessing that we would have done much worse; Katrina is one example. We had days to prepare for it, yet more than a thousand still died.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-14-2011, 10:38 AM
 
Location: Stillwater, Oklahoma
30,976 posts, read 21,630,499 times
Reputation: 9676
I would be more concerned over asking if California has been making its buildings as strong as Japan's.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2011, 10:41 AM
 
Location: You Ta Zhou
866 posts, read 1,560,189 times
Reputation: 401
Quote:
Originally Posted by StillwaterTownie View Post
I would be more concerned over asking if California has been making its buildings as strong as Japan's.
I agree, but I tried to be fair and compare cities of the same size. The West Coast's cities are all either too big or too small to make an accurate comparison.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2011, 10:43 AM
 
Location: Sinking in the Great Salt Lake
13,138 posts, read 22,810,657 times
Reputation: 14116
If it happened in Florida or California, everyone would have wigged out, started looting and started shooting each other the day after (just like New Orleans). The Japanese people are stoic, Americans are unstable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2011, 10:50 AM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,479 posts, read 59,771,962 times
Reputation: 24863
One Japanese city built a 33 ft high seawall after a previous tsunami. This tsunami was 40 ft high. This city was hammered flat by the earthquake and drowned by the tsunami. It is gone.

A California city was damaged by an 8 ft wave after several hours warning. Why did this happen?

There are always limits to the amount of protection a place can afford and there is no guarantee that the protection cannot be overwhelmed by a natural event.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2011, 11:17 AM
 
22,768 posts, read 30,727,592 times
Reputation: 14745
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kangrui View Post
I agree, but I tried to be fair and compare cities of the same size. The West Coast's cities are all either too big or too small to make an accurate comparison.
You might as well be arguing that Florida needs to be prepared for blizzards.

A "fair" comparison must include much more than city size , at the bare minimum it also must consider the likelihood of an earthquake.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2011, 11:27 AM
 
48,502 posts, read 96,838,702 times
Reputation: 18304
I doubt we would have done better but I have to say if we lok at disasters we have seen we have learned that the military is perhps our biggest asset. Politcal civilian agncy just can not cut the mustrad because of structure and the military's logics and man power ability and clear lies of caomand and responsiblities.We have to remmmber that japan is a small island that is very densely populated. I personally think that a disaster lke Katrina in a large city woud be much worse than it was in new orlenns really.Overall Japans advantage is it populace and their culture.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2011, 11:29 AM
 
Location: You Ta Zhou
866 posts, read 1,560,189 times
Reputation: 401
Quote:
Originally Posted by le roi View Post
You might as well be arguing that Florida needs to be prepared for blizzards.

A "fair" comparison must include much more than city size , at the bare minimum it also must consider the likelihood of an earthquake.
Sorry, it's hard to find a perfect comparison in the United States.

If you don't like to use Florida, how about if a 35-foot-tsunami hit San Diego?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2011, 11:36 AM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,749,261 times
Reputation: 3146
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kangrui View Post
It seems that a lot of people think that Japan was not very successful in stopping more devastation from happening. So imagine this scenario...

A huge earthquake occurs off the coast of Florida and a tsunami with 35-foot-high waves comes rushing towards Jacksonville, the metro area closest in population size to Sendai. In about half an hour, waves are wiping out towns along the Florida/Georgia/South Carolina coast.

Who honestly thinks that there would be fewer deaths in this disaster as compared to the Sendai earthquake? I'm guessing that we would have done much worse; Katrina is one example. We had days to prepare for it, yet more than a thousand still died.

Wow, do you have some sort of chip on your shoulder? I haven't heard anyone question Japan's response to the crisis.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2011, 11:36 AM
 
22,768 posts, read 30,727,592 times
Reputation: 14745
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kangrui View Post
Sorry, it's hard to find a perfect comparison in the United States.
Perfect is one thing, reasonable is another. Expecting the south atlantic coast to have the same level of tsunami and earthquake preparation as Japan is not reasonable, especially when we have bigger fish to fry (hurricanes).


Quote:
Originally Posted by Kangrui View Post
If you don't like to use Florida, how about if a 35-foot-tsunami hit San Diego?
You're asking if I think that California would've done better?

Answer to that is: no.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:57 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top