Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Well, that's what you get when dealing with an inexperienced, empty suit who is interested only in the glamor, image and partying down in the White House.
Looks like the WH knifed her in the back, trying to blame her for obama's paralysis.
Clinton has said from the beginning, she was not interested in running for President again, and that she was only considering her posting to SecState as a 1-term position. She's been saying it since 2009.
People like to forget these facts because it suits their agenda to make it look like she and Obama don't get along. Being Sec of State is a difficult and high pressure job. Why does it surprise anyone when someone leaves when their term is up? She's not a kid anymore to take the long, exhausting hours and consist travel.
Frankly Hillary was stupid to stick with the assignment this long under Obama's blatant ineptness.
I agree with that
I supported her before the counrty when gaga over Obama
I voted for mcCain and he would have meade a better president, hell BOZO would have made a better president that the hack we have now!!
At this point it would not surprise me at all if she does not run her self,
and she would have made a much better president that his dumb ass
as liberal as she is, she is much smarter than he is
but I lost respect for her as she seemingly kissed his butt for the last two years I might vote for her though depending on who the repubs come up with
it is all wide open as it should be!
You're right, there was absolutely no debt in the US prior to 15 Jan 2009.
Don't let us forget that.
Two wars, tax breaks for the richest citizens.
Yep, no problem there.
Five trillion in three years...really wanna go there?
Would seem it's three wars now.
Didn't we just see BO wait until after the election to cut a deal with the lame ducks extending those tax breaks for the top 1%?
As for the rest of this butchered thread... no one seems to want to believe Hillary is too conservative for Democrat ticket. I think the Dems joking about flooding into the republican primaries with a corporate identity ought to be followed through because the empty suit residing in GOP is only being filled by malevolent bots. Everyone knows all you've got to do is what gay republicans do- tell them everything they want to hear, and once in office do whatever you please for 4 yrs while Tea stomps around plotting and scheming. It's a placebo to keep whiners busy. Approval ratings don't mean a hill of beans if you have no intention of running again, but winning a single battle so that they can cost America a war is good enough for them. That's the objective. Destroy America from within.
Sincerely,
John Birch Society
Five trillion in three years...really wanna go there?
Would seem it's three wars now.
ROFL
What about the concept wars? Did anyone end those wars before they declared 20 more wars? List of wars on concepts - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Then there's the war on czars, and the war on liberals, the war on womankind... one of these days you'll get around to fighting your own damned self! hahahahahaa
You're right, there was absolutely no debt in the US prior to 15 Jan 2009.
Don't let us forget that.
Two wars, tax breaks for the richest citizens.
Yep, no problem there.
Check your facts............The Myth of the Clinton Surplus.
The claim is generally made that Clinton had a surplus of $69 billion in FY1998, $123 billion in FY1999 and $230 billion in FY2000 . In that same link, Clinton claimed that the national debt had been reduced by $360 billion in the last three years, presumably FY1998, FY1999, and FY2000--though, interestingly, $360 billion is not the sum of the alleged surpluses of the three years in question ($69B + $123B + $230B = $422B, not $360B).
While not defending the increase of the federal debt under President Bush, it's curious to see Clinton's record promoted as having generated a surplus. It never happened. There was never a surplus and the facts support that position. In fact, far from a $360 billion reduction in the national debt in FY1998-FY2000, there was an increase of $281 billion.
Verifying this is as simple as accessing theU.S. Treasury (see note about this link below) website where the national debt is updated daily and a history of the debt since January 1993 can be obtained. Considering the government's fiscal year ends on the last day of September each year, and considering Clinton's budget proposal in 1993 took effect in October 1993 and concluded September 1994 (FY1994), here's the national debt at the end of each year of Clinton Budgets:
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.