U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 03-18-2011, 10:31 AM
 
Location: California
11,425 posts, read 16,657,386 times
Reputation: 12447

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by chielgirl View Post
Why is that a fact?
Gee, I guess it's not.
You do understand that some hets have and enjoy anal sex; some gay men don't.

Hmmmm, what does that mean?
It doesn't make it right, you do know an anus is not a vagina don't you? It's not a sex organ and it has a purpose.

 
Old 03-18-2011, 10:33 AM
 
1,364 posts, read 2,548,627 times
Reputation: 808
Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
Are you saying something I wrote is wrong?
No you are 105% correct! Those 2-5% of the population that is gay would have surely killed civilization if they were ever allowed to exist peacefully in their ways. There is no way we would have even 20% of the population we have now if those nasty non breeders were allowed to live open and not bothered! It would surely spread and everybody would become gay!!!!!! I'm scared to think of what may happen
 
Old 03-18-2011, 10:36 AM
 
1,364 posts, read 2,548,627 times
Reputation: 808
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roaddog View Post
It doesn't make it right, you do know an anus is not a vagina don't you? It's not a sex organ and it has a purpose.

Quote:
Originally Posted by R.J. MacReady View Post
Human ears weren't meant to be pierced but folks still do it anyway. Defacing the flesh is forbidden by the bible yet people still get piercings and tattoos. Seems like a whole bunch of picking and choosing
...
 
Old 03-18-2011, 10:38 AM
 
Location: California
11,425 posts, read 16,657,386 times
Reputation: 12447
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rlarson21 View Post
Secondly, the ANUS is a SEXUAl EROGENOUS ZONE and was CREATED to BE as such, so you're wrong there too.
I'm sure it is for you but the facts are it's not a sex organ, it is there to expel waste, it serves a purpose.
 
Old 03-18-2011, 10:42 AM
 
1,777 posts, read 1,156,043 times
Reputation: 589
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roaddog View Post
It doesn't make it right, you do know an anus is not a vagina don't you? It's not a sex organ and it has a purpose.
Nothing except your genitals are sex organs. So if you have ever had any sexual activity other than vaginal intercourse with your significant other, you would be committing the exact same violation you're saying homosexuality is right now.

Ever had oral sex? The mouth is not a sex organ and it has a purpose.
Ever masturbated your partner? Your fingers and hands are not sex organs and they have a purpose.
Ever dressed up? Clothes are not sex organs and they have a purpose? Toys? Role playing?

You're right that the anus is not itself a sex organ, but it is absolutely an erogenous zone for a great many people, including heterosexuals and homosexuals. You just have to watch for the santorum after you're done.
 
Old 03-18-2011, 10:45 AM
 
3,681 posts, read 5,379,713 times
Reputation: 1484
Quote:
Originally Posted by maja View Post
Here is a link to an article by a respected psychiatrist, who reveals that homosexuality is a learned behavior. Lengthy article but very interesting re how the gay activist community got the diagnosis removed from the DSM.

Thought Reform And The Psychology of Homosexual Advocacy

Here is the actual position paper on the removal of the medical diagnosis of Homosexuality from the DSM. Another interesting read.

http://www.psychiatryonline.com/DSMP...y_Revision.pdf

"What will be the effect of carrying out such a proposal? Nodoubt,homosexual activist groups willclaim that psychiatry has at last recognized that homosexuality is as "normal" as heterosexuality. They will be wrong."
Here is another paper that explains how the APA was somewhat bullied into removing the diagnosis of Homosexuality from the DSM and the ramifications of which we are seeing today:

The A.P.A. Normalization of Homosexuality, and the Research Study of Irving Bieber
"A task force was set up to study homosexuality, but the members chosen included not a single psychiatrist who held the view that homosexuality was not a normal adaptation. There followed riots at scientific meetings by gay activists who increased the pressure on the Psychiatric Association."


Here are some other interesting reads on this whole issue for those that are interested.

"Born that way" Theory - Is Homosexuality Genetic?
 
Old 03-18-2011, 10:47 AM
 
Location: California
11,425 posts, read 16,657,386 times
Reputation: 12447
Quote:
Originally Posted by bc42gb43 View Post
Nothing except your genitals are sex organs. So if you have ever had any sexual activity other than vaginal intercourse with your significant other, you would be committing the exact same violation you're saying homosexuality is right now.

Ever had oral sex? The mouth is not a sex organ and it has a purpose.
Ever masturbated your partner? Your fingers and hands are not sex organs and they have a purpose.
Ever dressed up? Clothes are not sex organs and they have a purpose? Toys? Role playing?

You're right that the anus is not itself a sex organ, but it is absolutely an erogenous zone for a great many people, including heterosexuals and homosexuals. You just have to watch for the santorum after you're done.
You can do what ever you want, it doesn't mean it's ment to be done.
 
Old 03-18-2011, 10:47 AM
 
1,364 posts, read 2,548,627 times
Reputation: 808
Quote:
Originally Posted by bc42gb43 View Post
Nothing except your genitals are sex organs. So if you have ever had any sexual activity other than vaginal intercourse with your significant other, you would be committing the exact same violation you're saying homosexuality is right now.

Ever had oral sex? The mouth is not a sex organ and it has a purpose.
Ever masturbated your partner? Your fingers and hands are not sex organs and they have a purpose.
Ever dressed up? Clothes are not sex organs and they have a purpose? Toys? Role playing?

You're right that the anus is not itself a sex organ, but it is absolutely an erogenous zone for a great many people, including heterosexuals and homosexuals. You just have to watch for the santorum after you're done.
It's funny how certain posters clearly ignore this sound logic at any costs. I'd bet a huge amount of cash that these same folks who are crying about anal sex have oral sex which is just as bad when looking at everything. Both are not suppose to happen when using the "sex is only for procreation and anything else is unacceptable" argument when commenting on anal sex.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roaddog View Post
You can do what ever you want, it doesn't mean it's ment to be done.
Same with oral sex. Have you ever partaken in oral sex? Do you currently have oral sex? If so you are doing something that is not meant to be and is on the same level as what you are condemning which comes off a bit hypocritical.
 
Old 03-18-2011, 10:49 AM
 
1,777 posts, read 1,156,043 times
Reputation: 589
Quote:
Originally Posted by maja View Post
Here is another paper that explains how the APA was somewhat bullied into removing the diagnosis of Homosexuality from the DSM and the ramifications of which we are seeing today:

The A.P.A. Normalization of Homosexuality, and the Research Study of Irving Bieber
"A task force was set up to study homosexuality, but the members chosen included not a single psychiatrist who held the view that homosexuality was not a normal adaptation. There followed riots at scientific meetings by gay activists who increased the pressure on the Psychiatric Association."
Why do you keep citing to NARTH, whose agenda and bias and outdated methodologies have already been pointed out in this thread? Can we really be surprised that homosexuals posting in this thread get upset with those opposed when they repeatedly call them diseased, like Maja has been implying throughout this thread?

This American Life did a fantastic story (they're always fantastic) about the APA removing homosexuality from the DSM.

81 Words | This American Life
 
Old 03-18-2011, 10:50 AM
 
1,777 posts, read 1,156,043 times
Reputation: 589
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roaddog View Post
You can do what ever you want, it doesn't mean it's ment to be done.
You're criticizing people in this thread for doing things that you don't think are "ment" to be done. Have you ever done anything that's not "ment" to be done yourself? I'm going to guess that at least at some point in your life, you have, making your statements here hypocritical.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2018, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top