Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You know OZ - maybe you shouldn't say the hypocrisy of the left, but the hypocrisy of a blind Obama supporter, because
that is clearly what it is.
I have many democratic "left" folks that don't agree with
this.
That's not true - and it's quite rude to call someone a blind Obama supporter simply for supporting this effort that has broad global support from all sides. I oppose Obama on a number of issues, but I support this joint international effort so long as it is limited in scope.
LOL....invasion????
So now the USA is going to be involved in invading another nation?
It is?
But that reason is only applicable when you want it to be...hypocrisy.
We do?
You mean we only care if oil is involved?
This is actually funny,you are nonchalantly discussing attacking AND invading another nation that is of absolutely no threat to the USA...
Talk about a warhawk.
You really don't have a lot of thoughts to add to this conversation, huh? You're pretty much just repeating the same thing you said 20 pages ago. Fine. I've already proven you wrong. You can read the other posts.
Really? Humanitarian missions NEVER involve lobbing cruise missiles. We are attacking Libya.
Do a google for humanitarian and Libya.. quite a few are using that description.. perhaps reach out to them to correct their use of the word humanitarian?
Ghaddafi was very clear on what his forces would have done to civilians who supported the oppossition. so if the opposition lost.. not a pretty picture.
You seem to have no basis for your support of the outright attack on a sovereign nation.
To stop the Libyan gov't from killing it's own people,but that reason only applies to Libya and not other nations that are also killing their own people...
Because of the instability of the region,except of course Yemen,Bahrain and Syria are also in the same region and also have protests that are being violently put down.
Do a google for humanitarian and Libya.. quite a few are using that description.. perhaps reach out to them to correct their use of the word humanitarian?
An illustration of a humanitarian cruise missile....
You seem to have no basis for your support of the outright attack on a sovereign nation.
To stop the Libyan gov't from killing it's own people,but that reason only applies to Libya and not other nations that are also killing their own people...
Because of the instability of the region,except of course Yemen,Bahrain and Syria are also in the same region and also have protests that are being violently put down.
why isn't the UN pushing for resolutions on those countries?
Why isn't the Arab League pushing for a no fly zone over Sana or Manama?
Have these countries authorized the shoot down of civilian aircraft? Are they arming mercenaries to drive around Sana and Manama shooting anyone that is walking about?
where are the arab league forces they said woud be there?
did they bail out on us?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
