Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-19-2011, 10:36 AM
 
1,324 posts, read 1,198,419 times
Reputation: 445

Advertisements

DOJ to white male bullying victims: Tough luck - Washington Times
DOJ will only investigate bullying cases if the victim is considered protected under the 1964 Civil Rights legislation. In essence, only discrimination against a victim’s race, sex, national origin, disability, or religion will be considered by DOJ. The overweight straight white male who is verbally and/or physically harassed because of his size can consider himself invisible to the Justice Department.

If a minority is "bullied" by a white , DOJ will take the case , bullied by another minority , no.
Is this what the feds should be doing ? Why don't we pay mothers to home school , come to school for tests , go home , that will save many dollars. What crazy / wrong crap will they think of next to spend borrowed money on ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-19-2011, 10:39 AM
 
Location: Massachusetts
10,029 posts, read 8,346,222 times
Reputation: 4212
It benefits minorities and ignores white victims so that means that it can't possibly be racist.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2011, 10:51 AM
 
Location: Alameda, CA
7,605 posts, read 4,845,391 times
Reputation: 1438
Quote:
Originally Posted by westwaswon View Post
DOJ to white male bullying victims: Tough luck - Washington Times
DOJ will only investigate bullying cases if the victim is considered protected under the 1964 Civil Rights legislation. In essence, only discrimination against a victim’s race, sex, national origin, disability, or religion will be considered by DOJ. The overweight straight white male who is verbally and/or physically harassed because of his size can consider himself invisible to the Justice Department.

If a minority is "bullied" by a white , DOJ will take the case , bullied by another minority , no.
Is this what the feds should be doing ? Why don't we pay mothers to home school , come to school for tests , go home , that will save many dollars. What crazy / wrong crap will they think of next to spend borrowed money on ?
.
Interesting that you chose to focus on the race aspect. The article you linked certainly doesn't proclaim that the DOJ policy is racist.

Let me point out the key part of the hypothetical case presented in the article: "who is verbally and/or physically harassed because of his size".

They could have as easily claimed that the over sized victim was black and/or gay and the same policy would apply.

Is there a federal law protecting "overweight" people? Is there a federal law authorizing the DOJ to intervene in all bullying cases?

I don't believe there are, which is why the DOJ would not intervene.

Why don't you lobby you local representative to have generic bullying made a federal crime?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2011, 11:09 AM
 
Location: in the Southeast
334 posts, read 528,636 times
Reputation: 281
Very nicely sensationalized thread title and post... good thing the article actually provides clarity.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2011, 11:12 AM
 
Location: East Chicago, IN
3,100 posts, read 3,302,170 times
Reputation: 1697
Of course no one is going to read the article, just respond to the inflammatory title.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2011, 11:14 AM
 
4,367 posts, read 3,483,876 times
Reputation: 1431
The federal government shouldn't be concerned with "bullying". Just another way for the statists to get their tentacles further into our lives.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2011, 11:19 AM
 
23,838 posts, read 23,123,773 times
Reputation: 9409
From what im' reading, the thread title is accurate. The DOJ representative states outright they can only bring suits where they have authority....and authority is only granted through the laws that are on the books..namely the Civil Rights Act and others dealing with schools. It does indeed appear that white, heterosexual males are not covered unless someone bully's them for being one of those attributes. How often does someone get bullied for being white and heterosexual is the big question.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2011, 11:21 AM
 
1,777 posts, read 1,403,103 times
Reputation: 589
I disagree that the thread title is accurate, That policy should not be considered "racist" unless you consider the very 1964 Civil Rights Act to be racist.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2011, 11:30 AM
 
4,367 posts, read 3,483,876 times
Reputation: 1431
In this case, the DOJ is bound by the law. As I said above, what concerns me is the federal government getting involved in "bullying". What the hell?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2011, 11:37 AM
 
Location: Metro-Detroit area
4,050 posts, read 3,959,677 times
Reputation: 2107
Quote:
Originally Posted by westwaswon View Post
DOJ to white male bullying victims: Tough luck - Washington Times
DOJ will only investigate bullying cases if the victim is considered protected under the 1964 Civil Rights legislation. In essence, only discrimination against a victim’s race, sex, national origin, disability, or religion will be considered by DOJ. The overweight straight white male who is verbally and/or physically harassed because of his size can consider himself invisible to the Justice Department.

If a minority is "bullied" by a white , DOJ will take the case , bullied by another minority , no.
Is this what the feds should be doing ? Why don't we pay mothers to home school , come to school for tests , go home , that will save many dollars. What crazy / wrong crap will they think of next to spend borrowed money on ?

"...Obviously, not only is the heterosexual white male student out of luck but inner city minority students lose out in this deal too.."

"..If a schoolyard bully is a straight black male and his target is another straight black male where does that leave the victim in the eyes of Attorney General Eric Holder? What about two female students of the same sexual orientation and race? Is the victim in the latter situation considered to be less equal in the eyes of Obama’s Justice Department than a minority student who is picked on by a heterosexual white male student with no disabilities?.."


Did you even read your own article or did you just want to stop another "woe is me, I'm a white guy" thread.

In other words your assertion is b.s.!!..and so it that of the author's!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:15 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top