Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The Republicans said that under the previous ruling the law could go forward, so the judge issued another order that made it crystal clear that its implementation is to stop immediately until the case can be heard.
I'm not familiar enough with Wisconsin law to know the arguments of both sides.
an order put in place by a pro union biased judge. another pro union biased judge recused them self because of their bias. the union went judge shopping on this one.
The Republicans said that under the previous ruling the law could go forward, so the judge issued another order that made it crystal clear that its implementation is to stop immediately until the case can be heard.
I'm not familiar enough with Wisconsin law to know the arguments of both sides.
There are a few steps to be taken before a Wisconsin bill becomes law. A judge put a temporary restraining order on one of the steps (publication by the Secretary of State), so the Republicans bypassed that step and got the next step (Legislative Reference Bureau) to publish. The judge then made a ruling against these shenanigans making it crystal clear that the bill is not law until published by the Secretary of State.
The Republicans said that under the previous ruling the law could go forward, so the judge issued another order that made it crystal clear that its implementation is to stop immediately until the case can be heard.
I'm not familiar enough with Wisconsin law to know the arguments of both sides.
Tell the judge to see what Obama is doing with the healthcare law and drilling moratoriums.
Tell Obama about violating "process" when he launches attacks on Libya without the consent and approval of the Congress.
an order put in place by a pro union biased judge. another pro union biased judge recused them self because of their bias. the union went judge shopping on this one.
Pro-liberty judge
The republicans broke numerous laws trying to force through their attack on america. The judge should have thrown it out, but maybe just stall until the republicans get thrown out of office.
I'm not familiar enough with Wisconsin law to know the arguments of both sides.
The law doesn't really matter in this case. It's only a means to an end. The governor of Wisconsin is hell bent on union busting so his Big Business bosses can continue to maximize profits while screwing the middle class.
There are a few steps to be taken before a Wisconsin bill becomes law. A judge put a temporary restraining order on one of the steps (publication by the Secretary of State), so the Republicans bypassed that step and got the next step (Legislative Reference Bureau) to publish. The judge then made a ruling against these shenanigans making it crystal clear that the bill is not law until published by the Secretary of State.
Yes but she also banned the Secretary of State from publishing it, which means she is essentially creating law as she goes along rather than enforcing it..
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark S.
The law doesn't really matter in this case. It's only a means to an end. The governor of Wisconsin is hell bent on union busting so his Big Business bosses can continue to maximize profits while screwing the middle class.
This has nothing to do with businesses.. Please educate yourself before posting again..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.