Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Is Fred Phillips willfully negligent for burning the Qur'an?
Yes, he should be tried as such by the families of soldiers and civilians who may be harmed. 13 21.67%
No, burning the Qur'an isn't an unreasonable act 38 63.33%
Other (please explain) 9 15.00%
Voters: 60. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-04-2011, 07:22 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,464,288 times
Reputation: 27720

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by bulldogdad View Post
So your only for freedom if it does not offend anyone.
That's the PC way you know.
The Road to Utopia is paved with laws.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-04-2011, 07:25 PM
 
15,706 posts, read 11,771,287 times
Reputation: 7020
Quote:
Originally Posted by bulldogdad View Post
What in your opinion should those exceptions be?
I'm not saying any apply in this case. The only two that would come close are imminent lawless action and fighting words (although obviously the murders weren't imminent).

I'm merely tired of the "omg free speech, we can do anything we want, stop taking away our freedoms!" Free Speech is not absolute.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-04-2011, 07:28 PM
 
25,619 posts, read 36,692,234 times
Reputation: 23295
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
That's the PC way you know.
The Road to Utopia is paved with laws.

Also known as "The road to hell is paved with good intentions"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-04-2011, 10:24 PM
 
Location: somewhere in the woods
16,880 posts, read 15,194,933 times
Reputation: 5240
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiyero View Post
Freedom of Speech has exceptions, and negligence is not a criminal charge - it's a civil tort.
would people have the same reaction if putting the crucifix in urine had led to people getting killed? somehow I dont think so. not towards the makers of that item.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:56 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top