Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-14-2011, 08:21 AM
 
Location: 3rd rock from the sun
3,857 posts, read 6,957,786 times
Reputation: 1817

Advertisements

Oklahoma' SENATE BILL NO. 91 also fails to define natural born citizen

http://webserver1.lsb.state.ok.us/cf...SB91%20HCS.DOC
Bill Information


The candidates shall further be required to provide proof of identity and United States citizenship to the State Election Board. A candidate shall present a current state or federal government-issued photo identification to provide proof of identity, and shall also present one of the following documents to provide proof of United States natural-born citizenship:
1. An original birth document issued by a state, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or the District of Columbia, or a certified copy thereof;
2. An original birth certificate issued by the federal government, or a certified copy thereof;
3. An original United States Certificate of Birth Abroad, or certified copy thereof; or
4. An original Report of Birth Abroad of a Citizen of the United States, or certified copy thereof.


Found it. Oklahoma defines it here:

http://e-lobbyist.com/gaits/text/129798/129798.rtf
HOUSE BILL 2084

B. For the purposes of this section, “subject to the jurisdiction of the United States” has the meaning that it bears in Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, namely that the person is a child of at least one parent who owes no allegiance to any foreign sovereignty, or a child without citizenship or nationality in any foreign country. "

Last edited by Gary Siete; 04-14-2011 at 08:58 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-14-2011, 08:23 AM
nei nei won $500 in our forum's Most Engaging Poster Contest - Thirteenth Edition (Jan-Feb 2015). 

Over $104,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum and additional contests are planned
 
Location: Western Massachusetts
45,983 posts, read 53,485,386 times
Reputation: 15184
Quote:
Originally Posted by All American NYC View Post



Will this issue effect his Re-election chances?
No, because they only people that might believe he's ineligible would never vote for him; or likely any Democrat candidate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2011, 08:42 AM
 
Location: 3rd rock from the sun
3,857 posts, read 6,957,786 times
Reputation: 1817
Arizona is also on it's way to enacting legislation requiring Presidential candidates to produce a birth certificate. Luckily in February 2011 they passed legislation defining natural born citizen - which includes children of one ONE US citizen parent:

http://www.courthousenews.com/2011/02/01/SB1308.pdf

ARIZONA SB 1308

"A PERSON WHO IS BORN SUBJECT TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE UNITED STATES IS A NATURAL BORN UNITED STATES CITIZEN."

"AS USED IN THIS COMPACT, "SUBJECT TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE UNITED STATES" HAS THE MEANING THAT IT BEARS IN SECTION 1 OF THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION, NAMELY THAT THE PERSON IS A CHILD OF AT LEAST ONE PARENT WHO OWES NO ALLEGIANCE TO ANY FOREIGN SOVEREIGNTY, OR A CHILD WITHOUT CITIZENSHIP OR NATIONALITY IN ANY FOREIGN COUNTRY. FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS COMPACT A PERSON WHO OWES NO ALLEGIANCE TO ANY FOREIGN SOVEREIGNTY IS A UNITED STATES CITIZEN OR NATIONAL, OR AN IMMIGRANT ACCORDED THE PRIVILEGE OF RESIDING PERMANENTLY IN THE UNITED STATES, OR A PERSON WITHOUT NATIONALITY IN ANY FOREIGN COUNTRY."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2011, 08:42 AM
 
Location: Long Island,New York
8,164 posts, read 15,144,066 times
Reputation: 2534
Quote:
Originally Posted by All American NYC View Post



Will this issue effect his Re-election chances?
Is this the only way a republican can get past Obama? We all realize that no republican was going to win in 2008 because of all the damage Bush did, but even if you disqualified Obama, then Hillary would have been the president. They can keep digging all they want, it's just more petty BS by right-wingers. Maybe putting a quality candidate in the running would be a better idea. If they want to have a chance in 2012, they might want to pair a solid presidential and vice presidential candidate and not put forth the crap they did last time. Remember, Palin couldn't even name ONE magazine and NEVER gave direct answers on the questions being asked. She always just spewed crap that was unrelated to the questions!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2011, 08:43 AM
 
6,484 posts, read 6,617,004 times
Reputation: 1275
Quote:
Originally Posted by wade52 View Post
Not among those with IQs greater than their belt size.
careful now. You really risk offending a lot of his supporters.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2011, 08:44 AM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,389,283 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by All American NYC View Post
Will this issue effect his Re-election chances?
It'll just highlight how little else the GOP has to offer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2011, 08:44 AM
 
1,777 posts, read 1,403,103 times
Reputation: 589
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary Siete View Post
Arizona is also on it's way to enacting legislation requiring Presidential candidates to produce a birth certificate. Luckily in February 2011 they passed legislation defining natural born citizen - which includes children of one ONE US citizen parent:
Looks like Arizona will be well on its way to getting a judicial smackdown for blatantly unconstitutional legislation again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2011, 08:45 AM
 
6,484 posts, read 6,617,004 times
Reputation: 1275
On a side note, why are libs so keen on taking Hawaii's governor's word for it that Skippy is legit, but they don't want to let Arizona have a word to say in the illegal immigration fight?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2011, 08:49 AM
 
Location: Tampa Florida
22,229 posts, read 17,855,263 times
Reputation: 4585
Quote:
Originally Posted by All American NYC View Post



Will this issue effect his Re-election chances?
Not to any sane person.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2011, 08:49 AM
 
Location: 3rd rock from the sun
3,857 posts, read 6,957,786 times
Reputation: 1817
Quote:
Originally Posted by bc42gb43 View Post
Looks like Arizona will be well on its way to getting a judicial smackdown for blatantly unconstitutional legislation again.
Add South Dakota to your list:

2011 Session - Bill History

FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to provide for a compact concerning citizenship.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA:
Section 1. The Governor of South Dakota may execute a compact on behalf of the state with any one or more states who may by their legislative bodies, authorize a compact, in form substantially as follows:
(1) The state shall make a distinction in the birth certificates, certifications of live birth, or other birth records issued in the state, between persons born in the state who are born subject to the jurisdiction of the United States and persons who are not born subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. Persons born subject to the jurisdiction of the United States shall be designated as natural-born United States citizens.
(2) For the purposes of this compact, the phrase, subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, has the meaning that it bears in section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, namely that the person is a child of at least one parent
who owes no allegiance to any foreign sovereignty,
or a child without citizenship or nationality in any foreign country. For the purposes of this compact, a person who owes no allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is a United States citizen or national, or an immigrant accorded the privilege of residing permanently in the United States, or a person without citizenship or nationality in any foreign country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:19 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top