Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-25-2011, 11:16 AM
 
15,706 posts, read 11,767,786 times
Reputation: 7020

Advertisements

Merrily we troll along, troll along...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-25-2011, 11:17 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,081,664 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by filihok View Post
Not allowing two people to sign a contract based upon the sex of the people affects everyone.
If one was to agree, then why woulnt you allow 3 people to enter into a similar contract? Wouldnt they also be discriminated against?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiyero View Post
Merrily we troll along, troll along...
Simply having an opinion on a subject that disagrees with yours, does not make one a troll.. But posting such comments while bumping a thread does violate the tos..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-25-2011, 11:18 AM
 
7,871 posts, read 10,126,788 times
Reputation: 3241
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiyero View Post
Merrily we troll along, troll along...
Seriously.

If Calvinist's argument is sound, why can he not find any legal support for it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-25-2011, 11:18 AM
 
Location: Albuquerque, NM
13,285 posts, read 15,296,560 times
Reputation: 6658
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
If one was to agree, then why woulnt you allow 3 people to enter into a similar contract? Wouldnt they also be discriminated against?
I would allow them to
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-25-2011, 11:19 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,081,664 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by filihok View Post
I would allow them to
No it doesnt..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-25-2011, 11:20 AM
 
6,484 posts, read 6,614,378 times
Reputation: 1275
Quote:
Originally Posted by filihok View Post
Not allowing two people to sign a contract based upon the sex of the people affects everyone.

However, it disproportionally affects homosexuals, it is, therefore, discriminatory.
1. Anyone can "sign the contract" under the same restrictions as everyone else. My wife and I both had to find someone of the opposite gender to join into contract with.


2. Based on this argument, your beef is not discrimination based on sexual preference. It's that you don't like the current system. So get your buds together and change the law.

All I ask is that someone actually show me how gay people are being targeted for discrimination.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Strel View Post
Seriously.

If Calvinist's argument is sound, why can he not find any legal support for it?

Why is it up to me to go find some obscure case to support my statement against your silly arguments? You're the one making the dumb argument that supposedly innocent little homosexuals are being treated so horribly by big bad heteros.

This is getting old, Strel. You're smarter than this...I know you are.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-25-2011, 11:21 AM
 
Location: Maryland
18,630 posts, read 19,409,587 times
Reputation: 6462
Quote:
Originally Posted by wehotex View Post
Clement firm drops DOMA case - Ben Smith - POLITICO.com

This is another nail in the coffin of legal discrimination against gay couples and their families in this country.

Defense of DOMA is clearly not a defendable position.
Not so fast. Liberals are big bullies but it looks like he is not backing down.

Hopefully those who support DOMA flood this man with new business.

Quote:
"I resign out of the firmly-held belief that a representation should not be abandoned because the client's legal position is extremely unpopular in certain quarters. Defending unpopular clients is what lawyers do ... I recognized from the outset that this statute implicates very sensitive issues that prompt strong views on both sides. But having undertaken the representation, I believe there is no honorable course for me but to complete it," writes Clement.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-25-2011, 11:23 AM
 
Location: Maryland
18,630 posts, read 19,409,587 times
Reputation: 6462
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
If one was to agree, then why woulnt you allow 3 people to enter into a similar contract? Wouldnt they also be discriminated against?

Simply having an opinion on a subject that disagrees with yours, does not make one a troll.. But posting such comments while bumping a thread does violate the tos..
This argument is currently taking place in Canada. Where a woman wants her relationship with two men legally recognized. Frankly I see no reason to disallow incest between adults if DOMA falls.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-25-2011, 11:25 AM
 
Location: East Lansing, MI
28,353 posts, read 16,368,692 times
Reputation: 10467
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
If one was to agree, then why woulnt you allow 3 people to enter into a similar contract? Wouldnt they also be discriminated against?...
In my opinion? Yes. I support polygamist marriages, as well - provided that they are all able to legally consent to the contract.

However, that is not the discussion, and legal case, at hand. Unless you know of some polygamists that are trying to get a case before the SCOTUS?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-25-2011, 11:26 AM
 
6,484 posts, read 6,614,378 times
Reputation: 1275
Quote:
Originally Posted by hooligan View Post
In my opinion? Yes. I support polygamist marriages, as well - provided that they are all able to legally consent to the contract.

However, that is not the discussion, and legal case, at hand. Unless you know of some polygamists that are trying to get a case before the SCOTUS?
But...but...but...but....that's discrimination!!!!!!!!! Anyone should be able to get married anyway they want!!!!!! How dare you add conditions to it!!!!!!!!

At least that's the argument that some folks on this thread have been making.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:17 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top