Quote:
Originally Posted by maja
See Post #28.
|
NY Times shut me out of their system, but I remember that as a very good article from a few months back.
I agree with you. The fact that Mother Jones' article considered PhD's and academians to be the baseline of what constitutes the "correct" version of social science -- rather than, say, scientists from the private sector -- was a key consideration behind my statement that this article was a biased attempt at persuasion.
All they really told me is that conservatives are skeptical of traditionally liberal sources of information, regardless of the credentials.
Maybe next they should see if the majority of liberals believe in the scientific studies BP conducted in the gulf where it was concluded that "all is well" after the recent oil spill. When they inevitably show skepticism of the source (rightfully so, of course), would they be branded "Anti-science" ?